MMCTAgent: Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework for Complex Visual Reasoning

Read original: arXiv:2405.18358 - Published 5/29/2024 by Somnath Kumar, Yash Gadhia, Tanuja Ganu, Akshay Nambi
Total Score

0

MMCTAgent: Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework for Complex Visual Reasoning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent (MMCTAgent) framework for complex visual reasoning
  • Leverages language models and multimodal fusion to enable agents to reason about and interact with complex visual inputs
  • Designed for applications like clinical trial design, interactive learning, and autonomous mobile devices

Plain English Explanation

The MMCTAgent: Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework for Complex Visual Reasoning paper presents a new approach for building AI agents that can reason about and interact with complex visual information. These agents combine language models with techniques for fusing visual and textual data, allowing them to engage in more sophisticated reasoning and problem-solving compared to traditional computer vision or language-only systems.

The key innovation is the "critical thinking" aspect, where the agents don't just passively observe images or answer simple questions, but actively consider multiple perspectives, ask clarifying questions, and propose creative solutions. This could be useful for applications like designing clinical trials, where the agent might analyze trial protocols and patient data to suggest improvements. It could also enable interactive learning experiences, where the agent engages with a student by asking probing questions and offering guidance. Additionally, the multimodal capabilities could empower autonomous mobile devices to better understand and navigate complex real-world environments.

Overall, the MMCTAgent framework represents an important step towards building AI systems that can truly comprehend and reason about the richness of the physical and social world, rather than just passively observing it.

Technical Explanation

The MMCTAgent: Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework for Complex Visual Reasoning paper introduces a new architecture for developing AI agents capable of engaging in complex visual reasoning. At the core of the framework is a language model that can process textual inputs and outputs. This language model is combined with specialized modules for computer vision, multimodal fusion, and critical thinking.

The computer vision module analyzes visual inputs, extracting relevant features and information. The multimodal fusion module then integrates the visual and textual data, allowing the agent to reason about the interactions between them. The critical thinking module is responsible for actively considering multiple perspectives, asking clarifying questions, and proposing creative solutions to problems.

The authors demonstrate the capabilities of the MMCTAgent framework through several experiments, including clinical trial design, interactive learning, and autonomous mobile navigation. In the clinical trial scenario, the agent analyzes trial protocols and patient data to suggest improvements. In the interactive learning scenario, the agent engages with a student by asking probing questions and offering guidance. And in the mobile navigation scenario, the agent uses its multimodal perception capabilities to better understand and navigate complex real-world environments.

The authors also discuss the potential of the MMCTAgent framework for collaborative AI systems and multimodal physics-based reasoning, highlighting its versatility and broad applicability.

Critical Analysis

The MMCTAgent framework presented in the paper represents a significant advancement in the field of multimodal AI, but it is important to consider some potential limitations and areas for further research.

One potential concern is the complexity of the system, which may make it challenging to scale and deploy in real-world applications. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work should focus on improving the efficiency and scalability of the framework.

Additionally, the evaluation of the MMCTAgent's performance is primarily focused on specific use cases, such as clinical trial design and interactive learning. While these experiments demonstrate the framework's capabilities, it would be valuable to see more diverse and challenging test scenarios to fully assess the agent's critical thinking and reasoning abilities.

Another area for further exploration is the ethical implications of deploying such powerful AI agents. The paper does not address potential issues related to bias, transparency, or the responsible use of the technology. As the capabilities of these systems continue to advance, it will be crucial to consider the societal impacts and develop appropriate safeguards.

Despite these caveats, the MMCTAgent framework represents an exciting step forward in the quest to build AI systems that can engage in more sophisticated and contextual reasoning. By combining language models, computer vision, and critical thinking, the authors have laid the groundwork for a new generation of AI agents that can better understand and interact with the complex world around them.

Conclusion

The MMCTAgent: Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework for Complex Visual Reasoning paper presents a novel approach for developing AI agents capable of engaging in complex visual reasoning. By integrating language models, computer vision, and critical thinking capabilities, the MMCTAgent framework enables these agents to analyze visual inputs, consider multiple perspectives, and propose creative solutions to problems.

The potential applications of this technology are wide-ranging, from clinical trial design to interactive learning and autonomous mobile navigation. As the field of multimodal AI continues to evolve, the MMCTAgent framework represents an important step towards building AI systems that can truly understand and reason about the richness of the physical and social world.

While the paper highlights the promise of this technology, it also acknowledges the need to address challenges related to scalability, ethical considerations, and a more comprehensive evaluation of the agents' capabilities. Addressing these issues will be crucial as the MMCTAgent framework and similar approaches are developed further and deployed in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

MMCTAgent: Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework for Complex Visual Reasoning
Total Score

0

MMCTAgent: Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework for Complex Visual Reasoning

Somnath Kumar, Yash Gadhia, Tanuja Ganu, Akshay Nambi

Recent advancements in Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly improved their performance in tasks combining vision and language. However, challenges persist in detailed multi-modal understanding, comprehension of complex tasks, and reasoning over multi-modal information. This paper introduces MMCTAgent, a novel multi-modal critical thinking agent framework designed to address the inherent limitations of current MLLMs in complex visual reasoning tasks. Inspired by human cognitive processes and critical thinking, MMCTAgent iteratively analyzes multi-modal information, decomposes queries, plans strategies, and dynamically evolves its reasoning. Additionally, MMCTAgent incorporates critical thinking elements such as verification of final answers and self-reflection through a novel approach that defines a vision-based critic and identifies task-specific evaluation criteria, thereby enhancing its decision-making abilities. Through rigorous evaluations across various image and video understanding benchmarks, we demonstrate that MMCTAgent (with and without the critic) outperforms both foundational MLLMs and other tool-augmented pipelines.

Read more

5/29/2024

Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation
Total Score

0

Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation

Chen Liang, Zhifan Feng, Zihe Liu, Wenbin Jiang, Jinan Xu, Yufeng Chen, Yong Wang

Chain-of-thought prompting significantly boosts the reasoning ability of large language models but still faces three issues: hallucination problem, restricted interpretability, and uncontrollable generation. To address these challenges, we present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework, which can solve complex problems in an agent-style manner by multiple round LLM generation. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. In addition, we integrate the step's index into the reasoning process to form a graph structure for complex inference logic. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.We conduct extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our method on six common benchmarks. Results exhibit that our method brings in substantial improvements over current competitive approaches.

Read more

9/20/2024

Agent Q: Advanced Reasoning and Learning for Autonomous AI Agents
Total Score

0

Agent Q: Advanced Reasoning and Learning for Autonomous AI Agents

Pranav Putta, Edmund Mills, Naman Garg, Sumeet Motwani, Chelsea Finn, Divyansh Garg, Rafael Rafailov

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language tasks requiring complex reasoning, yet their application in agentic, multi-step reasoning within interactive environments remains a difficult challenge. Traditional supervised pre-training on static datasets falls short in enabling autonomous agent capabilities needed to perform complex decision-making in dynamic settings like web navigation. Previous attempts to bridge this ga-through supervised fine-tuning on curated expert demonstrations-often suffer from compounding errors and limited exploration data, resulting in sub-optimal policy outcomes. To overcome these challenges, we propose a framework that combines guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) search with a self-critique mechanism and iterative fine-tuning on agent interactions using an off-policy variant of the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) algorithm. Our method allows LLM agents to learn effectively from both successful and unsuccessful trajectories, thereby improving their generalization in complex, multi-step reasoning tasks. We validate our approach in the WebShop environment-a simulated e-commerce platform where it consistently outperforms behavior cloning and reinforced fine-tuning baseline, and beats average human performance when equipped with the capability to do online search. In real-world booking scenarios, our methodology boosts Llama-3 70B model's zero-shot performance from 18.6% to 81.7% success rate (a 340% relative increase) after a single day of data collection and further to 95.4% with online search. We believe this represents a substantial leap forward in the capabilities of autonomous agents, paving the way for more sophisticated and reliable decision-making in real-world settings.

Read more

8/15/2024

💬

Total Score

0

CT-Agent: Clinical Trial Multi-Agent with Large Language Model-based Reasoning

Ling Yue, Sixue Xing, Jintai Chen, Tianfan Fu

Large Language Models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems have shown impressive capabilities in natural language tasks but face challenges in clinical trial applications, primarily due to limited access to external knowledge. Recognizing the potential of advanced clinical trial tools that aggregate and predict based on the latest medical data, we propose an integrated solution to enhance their accessibility and utility. We introduce Clinical Agent System (ClinicalAgent), a clinical multi-agent system designed for clinical trial tasks, leveraging GPT-4, multi-agent architectures, LEAST-TO-MOST, and ReAct reasoning technology. This integration not only boosts LLM performance in clinical contexts but also introduces novel functionalities. The proposed method achieves competitive predictive performance in clinical trial outcome prediction (0.7908 PR-AUC), obtaining a 0.3326 improvement over the standard prompt Method. Publicly available code can be found at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ClinicalAgent-6671.

Read more

7/23/2024