Multi-Objective Hardware Aware Neural Architecture Search using Hardware Cost Diversity
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new approach for neural architecture search (NAS) that aims to find efficient and hardware-aware neural network architectures.
- The proposed method, called Hardware Cost Diversity (HCD), uses a multi-objective optimization strategy to balance model performance and hardware costs.
- HCD leverages the diversity of hardware costs across different candidate architectures to guide the search process towards optimal trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency.
Plain English Explanation
Neural architecture search (NAS) is a technique used to automatically design neural network architectures, which are the building blocks of many AI models. Traditionally, NAS has focused on optimizing for model performance, such as accuracy on a benchmark dataset. However, this can lead to architectures that are computationally expensive and difficult to deploy on real-world hardware, like mobile devices or embedded systems.
The researchers in this paper propose a new approach called Hardware Cost Diversity (HCD) that aims to find neural network architectures that not only perform well, but are also efficient and can run effectively on different types of hardware. The key idea behind HCD is to use a multi-objective optimization strategy that considers both model performance and hardware costs during the search process.
By considering hardware costs, the HCD method can identify neural network architectures that strike a balance between accuracy and efficiency. For example, it might find an architecture that is slightly less accurate than the best-performing model, but is much smaller and faster, making it more suitable for deployment on resource-constrained devices.
The researchers use a technique called "hardware cost diversity" to guide the search process. This means that they try to find a diverse set of candidate architectures that have a wide range of hardware costs, rather than just optimizing for the single best-performing model. This diversity helps the search algorithm explore different trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency, ultimately leading to more practical and deployable neural network architectures.
Technical Explanation
The HCD method uses a multi-objective optimization approach to search for neural network architectures that balance model performance and hardware costs. The key steps of the HCD method are:
-
Defining hardware cost metrics: The researchers define several hardware cost metrics, such as model size, latency, and energy consumption, that capture the efficiency of a neural network architecture on different hardware platforms.
-
Incorporating hardware cost diversity: During the search process, HCD aims to maintain a diverse set of candidate architectures with a wide range of hardware costs, rather than just optimizing for the single best-performing model. This is achieved by using a diversity-promoting algorithm that encourages the exploration of different regions of the hardware cost space.
-
Multi-objective optimization: HCD formulates the NAS problem as a multi-objective optimization task, where the objectives are to maximize model performance (e.g., accuracy) and minimize hardware costs. By considering both objectives simultaneously, HCD can find architectures that represent optimal trade-offs between these two competing goals.
The researchers evaluate the HCD method on several image classification benchmarks, including NAS-Bench-201 and CIFAR-10, and compare it to several state-of-the-art NAS methods. The results show that HCD can identify neural network architectures that are more efficient in terms of hardware costs while maintaining competitive model performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to neural architecture search that considers hardware costs in addition to model performance. By incorporating hardware cost diversity, the HCD method can find a range of efficient architectures that may be more suitable for real-world deployment compared to models optimized solely for accuracy.
However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the HCD method's performance across a wide range of hardware platforms and deployment scenarios. The experiments are limited to a few specific benchmarks and hardware cost metrics, and it would be valuable to see how the method scales to more diverse hardware environments and application domains.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the limitations and potential issues with the HCD approach. For example, it's unclear how the method would handle hardware platforms with significantly different cost characteristics, or how it would perform in scenarios where hardware costs are highly correlated with model performance.
Further research could also explore ways to incorporate more detailed hardware information, such as chip-specific architectural features or power consumption models, to make the hardware cost analysis more comprehensive and accurate.
Conclusion
The HCD method presented in this paper represents an important step towards developing neural architecture search techniques that are more aligned with real-world deployment constraints. By considering hardware costs in addition to model performance, HCD can identify efficient neural network architectures that are better suited for practical applications, especially on resource-constrained devices.
The key contribution of this work is the incorporation of hardware cost diversity into the NAS process, which helps the search algorithm explore a wider range of trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency. This approach has the potential to make NAS-generated models more deployable and sustainable, ultimately enabling the development of more practical and impactful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Multi-Objective Hardware Aware Neural Architecture Search using Hardware Cost Diversity
Nilotpal Sinha, Peyman Rostami, Abd El Rahman Shabayek, Anis Kacem, Djamila Aouada
Hardware-aware Neural Architecture Search approaches (HW-NAS) automate the design of deep learning architectures, tailored specifically to a given target hardware platform. Yet, these techniques demand substantial computational resources, primarily due to the expensive process of assessing the performance of identified architectures. To alleviate this problem, a recent direction in the literature has employed representation similarity metric for efficiently evaluating architecture performance. Nonetheless, since it is inherently a single objective method, it requires multiple runs to identify the optimal architecture set satisfying the diverse hardware cost constraints, thereby increasing the search cost. Furthermore, simply converting the single objective into a multi-objective approach results in an under-explored architectural search space. In this study, we propose a Multi-Objective method to address the HW-NAS problem, called MO-HDNAS, to identify the trade-off set of architectures in a single run with low computational cost. This is achieved by optimizing three objectives: maximizing the representation similarity metric, minimizing hardware cost, and maximizing the hardware cost diversity. The third objective, i.e. hardware cost diversity, is used to facilitate a better exploration of the architecture search space. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method in efficiently addressing the HW-NAS problem across six edge devices for the image classification task.
Read more4/22/2024
0
Multi-objective Differentiable Neural Architecture Search
Rhea Sanjay Sukthanker, Arber Zela, Benedikt Staffler, Samuel Dooley, Josif Grabocka, Frank Hutter
Pareto front profiling in multi-objective optimization (MOO), i.e. finding a diverse set of Pareto optimal solutions, is challenging, especially with expensive objectives like neural network training. Typically, in MOO neural architecture search (NAS), we aim to balance performance and hardware metrics across devices. Prior NAS approaches simplify this task by incorporating hardware constraints into the objective function, but profiling the Pareto front necessitates a computationally expensive search for each constraint. In this work, we propose a novel NAS algorithm that encodes user preferences for the trade-off between performance and hardware metrics, and yields representative and diverse architectures across multiple devices in just one search run. To this end, we parameterize the joint architectural distribution across devices and multiple objectives via a hypernetwork that can be conditioned on hardware features and preference vectors, enabling zero-shot transferability to new devices. Extensive experiments with up to 19 hardware devices and 3 objectives showcase the effectiveness and scalability of our method. Finally, we show that, without extra costs, our method outperforms existing MOO NAS methods across a broad range of qualitatively different search spaces and datasets, including MobileNetV3 on ImageNet-1k, an encoder-decoder transformer space for machine translation and a decoder-only transformer space for language modelling.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Efficient Multi-Objective Neural Architecture Search via Pareto Dominance-based Novelty Search
An Vo, Ngoc Hoang Luong
Neural Architecture Search (NAS) aims to automate the discovery of high-performing deep neural network architectures. Traditional objective-based NAS approaches typically optimize a certain performance metric (e.g., prediction accuracy), overlooking large parts of the architecture search space that potentially contain interesting network configurations. Furthermore, objective-driven population-based metaheuristics in complex search spaces often quickly exhaust population diversity and succumb to premature convergence to local optima. This issue becomes more complicated in NAS when performance objectives do not fully align with the actual performance of the candidate architectures, as is often the case with training-free metrics. While training-free metrics have gained popularity for their rapid performance estimation of candidate architectures without incurring computation-heavy network training, their effective incorporation into NAS remains a challenge. This paper presents the Pareto Dominance-based Novelty Search for multi-objective NAS with Multiple Training-Free metrics (MTF-PDNS). Unlike conventional NAS methods that optimize explicit objectives, MTF-PDNS promotes population diversity by utilizing a novelty score calculated based on multiple training-free performance and complexity metrics, thereby yielding a broader exploration of the search space. Experimental results on standard NAS benchmark suites demonstrate that MTF-PDNS outperforms conventional methods driven by explicit objectives in terms of convergence speed, diversity maintenance, architecture transferability, and computational costs.
Read more7/31/2024
0
Multi-objective Neural Architecture Search by Learning Search Space Partitions
Yiyang Zhao, Linnan Wang, Tian Guo
Deploying deep learning models requires taking into consideration neural network metrics such as model size, inference latency, and #FLOPs, aside from inference accuracy. This results in deep learning model designers leveraging multi-objective optimization to design effective deep neural networks in multiple criteria. However, applying multi-objective optimizations to neural architecture search (NAS) is nontrivial because NAS tasks usually have a huge search space, along with a non-negligible searching cost. This requires effective multi-objective search algorithms to alleviate the GPU costs. In this work, we implement a novel multi-objectives optimizer based on a recently proposed meta-algorithm called LaMOO on NAS tasks. In a nutshell, LaMOO speedups the search process by learning a model from observed samples to partition the search space and then focusing on promising regions likely to contain a subset of the Pareto frontier. Using LaMOO, we observe an improvement of more than 200% sample efficiency compared to Bayesian optimization and evolutionary-based multi-objective optimizers on different NAS datasets. For example, when combined with LaMOO, qEHVI achieves a 225% improvement in sample efficiency compared to using qEHVI alone in NasBench201. For real-world tasks, LaMOO achieves 97.36% accuracy with only 1.62M #Params on CIFAR10 in only 600 search samples. On ImageNet, our large model reaches 80.4% top-1 accuracy with only 522M #FLOPs.
Read more7/19/2024