Multi-tool Integration Application for Math Reasoning Using Large Language Model
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a multi-tool integration application that combines a large language model (LLM) with various mathematical reasoning tools to enhance math problem-solving capabilities.
- Demonstrates how the integration of different tools can improve the performance of an LLM on math-related tasks.
- Introduces a novel approach to leveraging the strengths of both LLMs and specialized mathematical tools for enhanced reasoning and problem-solving.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a novel application that integrates a large language model (LLM) with various mathematical reasoning tools to improve the LLM's ability to solve math problems. Large language models are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data that can understand and generate human-like language. However, they often struggle with complex mathematical reasoning tasks.
To address this, the researchers have developed a multi-tool integration application that combines the LLM with specialized math tools, such as symbolic equation solvers and ontology-based reasoners. By integrating these different tools, the system can leverage the strengths of each component to enhance its overall math reasoning capabilities.
For example, the LLM can be used to understand the natural language context of a math problem, while the specialized tools can be employed to perform precise mathematical operations and logical reasoning. The integration of these components allows the system to tackle complex math problems more effectively than the LLM alone.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a multi-tool integration application that combines a large language model (LLM) with various mathematical reasoning tools to improve the LLM's performance on math-related tasks. The key components of the system include:
-
Large Language Model: The researchers utilize a state-of-the-art LLM, such as ERNIE-4.0, to understand the natural language context of math problems.
-
Mathematical Reasoning Tools: The application integrates specialized tools for symbolic equation solving, ontology-based reasoning, and other mathematical capabilities to complement the LLM's natural language understanding.
-
Integration Framework: The researchers develop a framework that seamlessly integrates the LLM and the mathematical reasoning tools, allowing them to work together effectively to solve complex math problems.
The system is evaluated on a variety of math-related tasks, including math problem-solving and mathematical coding competency. The results demonstrate that the multi-tool integration approach significantly outperforms the LLM alone, highlighting the benefits of leveraging specialized mathematical tools in conjunction with powerful language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models. By integrating specialized tools, the researchers have addressed a key limitation of LLMs, which tend to struggle with complex mathematical tasks.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the limitations or potential issues with the proposed approach. For instance, it would be useful to understand the computational overhead and latency introduced by the integration of multiple tools, as well as any potential challenges in seamlessly coordinating the different components.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the generalizability of the approach beyond the specific tasks and tools evaluated. It would be valuable to investigate how the multi-tool integration framework could be adapted to work with different types of LLMs and mathematical reasoning tools, and to assess its performance on a wider range of math-related challenges.
Conclusion
The proposed multi-tool integration application represents a significant step forward in leveraging the combined strengths of large language models and specialized mathematical reasoning tools. By integrating these components, the system is able to achieve enhanced performance on a variety of math-related tasks, demonstrating the potential of this approach to advance the field of mathematical reasoning in AI.
The research highlights the importance of developing hybrid systems that can effectively combine diverse capabilities to tackle complex problems. As the field of AI continues to evolve, such integrated solutions may become increasingly crucial in bridging the gap between language understanding and specialized domain knowledge.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Multi-tool Integration Application for Math Reasoning Using Large Language Model
Zhihua Duan, Jialin Wang
Mathematical reasoning is an important research direction in the field of artificial intelligence. This article proposes a novel multi tool application framework for mathematical reasoning, aiming to achieve more comprehensive and accurate mathematical reasoning by utilizing the collaborative effect of large language models (LLMs) and multiple external tools. Firstly, use a Math Tool to perform basic mathematical calculations during the inference process through interaction with LLM. Secondly, Code Tool can generate code fragments that comply with syntax rules and execute them, providing support for complex mathematical problems. Then, through the iterative reasoning of the CoT Tool, the logical coherence and accuracy of mathematical reasoning are enhanced. Ultimately, by using self consistency tools to select the final answer based on different parameters, the consistency and reliability of reasoning are improved. Through the synergistic effect of these tools, the framework has achieved significant performance improvement in mathematical reasoning tasks. We conducted experiments on the NumGLUE Task 4 test set, which includes 220 mathematical reasoning fill in the blank questions. The experimental results showed that, based on Math Tool, Code Tool, and CoT Tool, in Task 4 task,our method achieved an accuracy of 89.09,compared with the GPT3+FewShot baseline, Few Shot+ERNIE-4.0+self consistency improved by 49.09%, and compared with fine-tuning the Fine tuning baseline, Few Shot+ERNIE-4.0+self consistency improved by 52.29%
Read more8/23/2024
💬
0
Logic Contrastive Reasoning with Lightweight Large Language Model for Math Word Problems
Ding Kai, Ma Zhenguo, Yan Xiaoran
This study focuses on improving the performance of lightweight Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning tasks. We introduce a novel method for measuring mathematical logic similarity and design an automatic screening mechanism to construct a set of reference problems that integrate both semantic and logical similarity. By employing carefully crafted positive and negative example prompts, we guide the model towards adopting sound reasoning logic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to utilize retrieval-enhanced generation for mathematical problem-solving. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves a 15.8% improvement over the Chain of Thought approach on the SVAMP dataset and a 21.5 % improvement on the GSM8K dataset. Further application of this method to a large-scale model with 175 billion parameters yields performance comparable to the best results on both aforementioned datasets. Finally, we conduct an analysis of errors during the reasoning process, providing valuable insights and directions for future research on reasoning tasks using large language models.
Read more9/4/2024
💬
0
MuMath-Code: Combining Tool-Use Large Language Models with Multi-perspective Data Augmentation for Mathematical Reasoning
Shuo Yin, Weihao You, Zhilong Ji, Guoqiang Zhong, Jinfeng Bai
The tool-use Large Language Models (LLMs) that integrate with external Python interpreters have significantly enhanced mathematical reasoning capabilities for open-source LLMs, while tool-free methods chose another track: augmenting math reasoning data. However, a great method to integrate the above two research paths and combine their advantages remains to be explored. In this work, we firstly include new math questions via multi-perspective data augmenting methods and then synthesize code-nested solutions to them. The open LLMs (i.e., Llama-2) are finetuned on the augmented dataset to get the resulting models, MuMath-Code ($mu$-Math-Code). During the inference phase, our MuMath-Code generates code and interacts with the external python interpreter to get the execution results. Therefore, MuMath-Code leverages the advantages of both the external tool and data augmentation. To fully leverage the advantages of our augmented data, we propose a two-stage training strategy: In Stage-1, we finetune Llama-2 on pure CoT data to get an intermediate model, which then is trained on the code-nested data in Stage-2 to get the resulting MuMath-Code. Our MuMath-Code-7B achieves 83.8 on GSM8K and 52.4 on MATH, while MuMath-Code-70B model achieves new state-of-the-art performance among open methods -- achieving 90.7% on GSM8K and 55.1% on MATH. Extensive experiments validate the combination of tool use and data augmentation, as well as our two-stage training strategy. We release the proposed dataset along with the associated code for public use.
Read more5/14/2024
0
MATHSENSEI: A Tool-Augmented Large Language Model for Mathematical Reasoning
Debrup Das, Debopriyo Banerjee, Somak Aditya, Ashish Kulkarni
Tool-augmented Large Language Models (TALMs) are known to enhance the skillset of large language models (LLMs), thereby, leading to their improved reasoning abilities across many tasks. While, TALMs have been successfully employed in different question-answering benchmarks, their efficacy on complex mathematical reasoning benchmarks, and the potential complementary benefits offered by tools for knowledge retrieval and mathematical equation solving are open research questions. In this work, we present MathSensei, a tool-augmented large language model for mathematical reasoning. We study the complementary benefits of the tools - knowledge retriever (Bing Web Search), program generator + executor (Python), and symbolic equation solver (Wolfram-Alpha API) through evaluations on mathematical reasoning datasets. We perform exhaustive ablations on MATH, a popular dataset for evaluating mathematical reasoning on diverse mathematical disciplines. We also conduct experiments involving well-known tool planners to study the impact of tool sequencing on the model performance. MathSensei achieves 13.5% better accuracy over gpt-3.5-turbo with Chain-of-Thought on the MATH dataset. We further observe that TALMs are not as effective for simpler math word problems (in GSM-8K), and the benefit increases as the complexity and required knowledge increases (progressively over AQuA, MMLU-Math, and higher level complex questions in MATH). The code and data are available at https://github.com/Debrup-61/MathSensei.
Read more4/4/2024