Narrowing the Gap between Adversarial and Stochastic MDPs via Policy Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2407.05704 - Published 7/9/2024 by Daniil Tiapkin (CMAP, LMO), Evgenii Chzhen (LMO, CELESTE), Gilles Stoltz (LMO, CELESTE)
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper focuses on the problem of learning in adversarial Markov decision processes (MDPs) with an oblivious adversary in a full-information setting.
  • The agent interacts with the environment over T episodes, each with H stages, and the reward function is revealed only at the end of each episode.
  • The authors propose an algorithm called APO-MVP that achieves a regret bound of order ~O(poly(H)√(SAT)), where S and A are the sizes of the state and action spaces, respectively.
  • This result improves upon the best-known regret bound by a factor of √S, bridging the gap between adversarial and stochastic MDPs, and matching the minimax lower bound Ω(√(H^3SAT)) in terms of the dependencies on S, A, and T.
  • The algorithm and analysis avoid the typical tool of occupancy measures, instead performing policy optimization based on dynamic programming and a black-box online linear optimization strategy run over estimated advantage functions.

Plain English Explanation

In this research, the authors are studying a type of decision-making problem called a Markov Decision Process (MDP), where an agent interacts with an environment and tries to maximize its reward over time. The twist is that the environment is adversarial, meaning it actively tries to minimize the agent's reward, and the agent doesn't know the reward function in advance.

The authors propose a new algorithm, called APO-MVP, that allows the agent to learn and adapt in this adversarial setting. The key idea is to use a combination of dynamic programming and online optimization techniques to find the best policy (a set of rules for how the agent should act) without relying on the typical "occupancy measure" approach, which can be computationally complex.

The algorithm's performance is measured by a metric called "regret," which represents how much the agent's total reward falls short of the optimal reward that could have been achieved with perfect information. The authors show that their algorithm can achieve a regret bound that is better than the previous best-known result, and that this bound matches the theoretical lower limit for this type of problem.

The significance of this work is that it helps bridge the gap between the well-understood stochastic MDP setting and the more challenging adversarial MDP setting, providing a more efficient and practical way for agents to learn and thrive in uncertain, hostile environments. This could have applications in areas like robotics, game AI, and resource allocation.

Technical Explanation

The paper considers the problem of learning in adversarial Markov decision processes (MDPs) with an oblivious adversary in a full-information setting. This means that the agent interacts with an environment over T episodes, each consisting of H stages, and the reward function is revealed only at the end of each episode. The environment is actively trying to minimize the agent's reward, but the agent has access to full information about the environment's dynamics.

To address this challenge, the authors propose an algorithm called APO-MVP (Adversarial Policy Optimization with Minimax-Optimal Value Prediction). The key features of this algorithm are:

  1. Avoiding Occupancy Measures: Rather than relying on the typical tool of occupancy measures, which can be computationally complex, the algorithm performs policy optimization based on dynamic programming and a black-box online linear optimization strategy run over estimated advantage functions.

  2. Regret Bound: The authors show that APO-MVP achieves a regret bound of order ~O(poly(H)√(SAT)), where S and A are the sizes of the state and action spaces, respectively. This result improves upon the best-known regret bound by a factor of √S, bridging the gap between adversarial and stochastic MDPs, and matching the minimax lower bound Ω(√(H^3SAT)) in terms of the dependencies on S, A, and T.

  3. Technical Innovations: The analysis of APO-MVP leverages two recent techniques: policy optimization based on online linear optimization strategies and a refined martingale analysis of the impact on values of estimating transitions kernels Zhang et al., 2023.

The significance of this work is that it provides a more efficient and practical way for agents to learn and thrive in uncertain, hostile environments, with potential applications in areas like robotics, game AI, and resource allocation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a strong technical contribution, with a rigorous analysis and a clear improvement over the state-of-the-art. However, there are a few caveats and limitations worth considering:

  1. Complexity of the Algorithm: While the authors claim that their algorithm is easy to implement, the technical details, particularly the use of online linear optimization strategies, may still pose a challenge for some practitioners.

  2. Assumptions and Generalization: The paper assumes a full-information setting, which may not always be the case in real-world applications. It would be valuable to explore extensions of the algorithm to partial-information or other more realistic scenarios.

  3. Empirical Evaluation: The paper does not include any empirical evaluation of the proposed algorithm. It would be helpful to see how it performs in practice, especially compared to other state-of-the-art methods.

  4. Potential Biases: As with any optimization-based approach, there may be potential biases or limitations in the way the algorithm learns and adapts to the environment. Further investigation into the algorithm's behavior and failure modes could provide valuable insights.

Despite these minor concerns, the overall technical contribution of this paper is significant, and the authors' approach of combining dynamic programming and online optimization techniques is a promising direction for further research in the field of reinforcement learning and adversarial decision-making.

Conclusion

In this paper, the authors tackle the challenging problem of learning in adversarial Markov decision processes with an oblivious adversary. They propose a novel algorithm, APO-MVP, that achieves a regret bound superior to the previous best-known result and matches the theoretical lower limit for this type of problem.

The key innovations of the APO-MVP algorithm are its ability to perform policy optimization without relying on occupancy measures, and its use of a combination of dynamic programming and online linear optimization techniques. This approach bridges the gap between adversarial and stochastic MDPs, potentially unlocking new applications in areas like robotics, game AI, and resource allocation.

While the paper presents a strong technical contribution, there are a few areas for further exploration, such as the complexity of the algorithm, the generalization to more realistic scenarios, and the empirical evaluation of the approach. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the field of reinforcement learning and adversarial decision-making, and it will likely inspire further research into efficient and practical algorithms for learning in uncertain, hostile environments.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Narrowing the Gap between Adversarial and Stochastic MDPs via Policy Optimization

Daniil Tiapkin (CMAP, LMO), Evgenii Chzhen (LMO, CELESTE), Gilles Stoltz (LMO, CELESTE)

In this paper, we consider the problem of learning in adversarial Markov decision processes [MDPs] with an oblivious adversary in a full-information setting. The agent interacts with an environment during $T$ episodes, each of which consists of $H$ stages, and each episode is evaluated with respect to a reward function that will be revealed only at the end of the episode. We propose an algorithm, called APO-MVP, that achieves a regret bound of order $tilde{mathcal{O}}(mathrm{poly}(H)sqrt{SAT})$, where $S$ and $A$ are sizes of the state and action spaces, respectively. This result improves upon the best-known regret bound by a factor of $sqrt{S}$, bridging the gap between adversarial and stochastic MDPs, and matching the minimax lower bound $Omega(sqrt{H^3SAT})$ as far as the dependencies in $S,A,T$ are concerned. The proposed algorithm and analysis completely avoid the typical tool given by occupancy measures; instead, it performs policy optimization based only on dynamic programming and on a black-box online linear optimization strategy run over estimated advantage functions, making it easy to implement. The analysis leverages two recent techniques: policy optimization based on online linear optimization strategies (Jonckheere et al., 2023) and a refined martingale analysis of the impact on values of estimating transitions kernels (Zhang et al., 2023).

Read more

7/9/2024

Achieving Tractable Minimax Optimal Regret in Average Reward MDPs
Total Score

0

Achieving Tractable Minimax Optimal Regret in Average Reward MDPs

Victor Boone, Zihan Zhang

In recent years, significant attention has been directed towards learning average-reward Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). However, existing algorithms either suffer from sub-optimal regret guarantees or computational inefficiencies. In this paper, we present the first tractable algorithm with minimax optimal regret of $widetilde{mathrm{O}}(sqrt{mathrm{sp}(h^*) S A T})$, where $mathrm{sp}(h^*)$ is the span of the optimal bias function $h^*$, $S times A$ is the size of the state-action space and $T$ the number of learning steps. Remarkably, our algorithm does not require prior information on $mathrm{sp}(h^*)$. Our algorithm relies on a novel subroutine, Projected Mitigated Extended Value Iteration (PMEVI), to compute bias-constrained optimal policies efficiently. This subroutine can be applied to various previous algorithms to improve regret bounds.

Read more

6/4/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Near-Optimal Learning and Planning in Separated Latent MDPs

Fan Chen, Constantinos Daskalakis, Noah Golowich, Alexander Rakhlin

We study computational and statistical aspects of learning Latent Markov Decision Processes (LMDPs). In this model, the learner interacts with an MDP drawn at the beginning of each epoch from an unknown mixture of MDPs. To sidestep known impossibility results, we consider several notions of separation of the constituent MDPs. The main thrust of this paper is in establishing a nearly-sharp *statistical threshold* for the horizon length necessary for efficient learning. On the computational side, we show that under a weaker assumption of separability under the optimal policy, there is a quasi-polynomial algorithm with time complexity scaling in terms of the statistical threshold. We further show a near-matching time complexity lower bound under the exponential time hypothesis.

Read more

6/13/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Optimistic Regret Bounds for Online Learning in Adversarial Markov Decision Processes

Sang Bin Moon, Abolfazl Hashemi

The Adversarial Markov Decision Process (AMDP) is a learning framework that deals with unknown and varying tasks in decision-making applications like robotics and recommendation systems. A major limitation of the AMDP formalism, however, is pessimistic regret analysis results in the sense that although the cost function can change from one episode to the next, the evolution in many settings is not adversarial. To address this, we introduce and study a new variant of AMDP, which aims to minimize regret while utilizing a set of cost predictors. For this setting, we develop a new policy search method that achieves a sublinear optimistic regret with high probability, that is a regret bound which gracefully degrades with the estimation power of the cost predictors. Establishing such optimistic regret bounds is nontrivial given that (i) as we demonstrate, the existing importance-weighted cost estimators cannot establish optimistic bounds, and (ii) the feedback model of AMDP is different (and more realistic) than the existing optimistic online learning works. Our result, in particular, hinges upon developing a novel optimistically biased cost estimator that leverages cost predictors and enables a high-probability regret analysis without imposing restrictive assumptions. We further discuss practical extensions of the proposed scheme and demonstrate its efficacy numerically.

Read more

5/6/2024