Optimistic Regret Bounds for Online Learning in Adversarial Markov Decision Processes

Overview

• The Adversarial Markov Decision Process (AMDP) is a learning framework for decision-making in uncertain and changing environments, such as robotics and recommendation systems.
• A key limitation of AMDP is that it assumes a pessimistic, adversarial cost function, even though real-world settings may not be truly adversarial.
• This paper introduces a new variant of AMDP that aims to minimize regret while utilizing a set of cost predictors, which can lead to more optimistic regret bounds.
• The paper presents a novel policy search method that achieves sublinear optimistic regret with high probability, meaning the regret bound improves as the cost predictors become more accurate.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a problem called the Adversarial Markov Decision Process (AMDP), which is a way of modeling decision-making in uncertain and changing environments. This could be useful for things like controlling a robot or building a recommendation system.

The main issue with the standard AMDP approach is that it assumes the environment is always trying to oppose the decision-maker in a very adversarial way. However, in many real-world situations, the environment may not be quite that hostile - it might just be somewhat unpredictable or changing over time.

To address this, the researchers propose a new version of AMDP that tries to take advantage of some cost predictors - models that can estimate what the costs of different actions will be. By using these predictors, the new approach can achieve better "regret" bounds, meaning the decision-maker doesn't have to do too much worse than if they had perfect information about the environment.

The key innovation is a new way of estimating the costs that provides an "optimistic" bias, meaning it assumes the environment is a bit nicer than it actually is. This, combined with the cost predictors, allows the method to achieve good regret bounds without requiring the environment to be truly adversarial.

The paper also discusses some practical ways to extend this approach and shows that it works well in some numerical experiments.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new variant of the Adversarial Markov Decision Process (AMDP) framework, which aims to address a key limitation of the standard AMDP formalism. While the AMDP assumes the cost function can change arbitrarily from one episode to the next in an adversarial manner, the authors argue that this may be overly pessimistic for many real-world settings where the evolution is not truly adversarial.

To address this, the authors propose a new setting where the decision-maker has access to a set of cost predictors that can provide estimates of the upcoming costs. The goal is to minimize regret while leveraging these predictors.

The paper develops a new policy search method that achieves sublinear optimistic regret with high probability. This means the regret bound gracefully degrades as the cost predictors become more accurate, in contrast to the pessimistic regret bounds of the standard AMDP.

The key technical contribution is a novel optimistically biased cost estimator that leverages the cost predictors. The authors show that existing importance-weighted estimators cannot establish optimistic regret bounds in this setting, necessitating the development of this new estimator.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful approach to addressing a key limitation of the standard AMDP framework. By introducing cost predictors and developing an optimistically biased estimator, the authors are able to derive regret bounds that are more reflective of real-world settings where the environment may not be truly adversarial.

That said, the proposed method does rely on the availability of reasonably accurate cost predictors, which may not always be the case in practice. The paper acknowledges this and discusses potential extensions to relax this requirement, but further research may be needed to fully address this limitation.

Additionally, while the theoretical regret bounds are impressive, the numerical experiments are somewhat limited in scope. It would be helpful to see the method applied to a wider range of decision-making problems to better understand its practical performance and limitations.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the literature on AMDP and optimistic online learning, providing a promising approach for improving the realism and performance of decision-making under uncertainty.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new variant of the Adversarial Markov Decision Process (AMDP) framework that aims to minimize regret while utilizing a set of cost predictors. The key innovation is a novel optimistically biased cost estimator that allows the method to achieve sublinear optimistic regret bounds, meaning the regret improves as the cost predictors become more accurate.

This work addresses a key limitation of the standard AMDP formalism, which assumes a pessimistic, adversarial environment. By incorporating cost predictors, the new approach is able to more realistically model decision-making in uncertain and changing environments, with potential applications in robotics, recommendation systems, and other domains.

The theoretical and numerical results presented in the paper are promising, though the reliance on accurate cost predictors is an important limitation that merits further exploration. Overall, this research represents a valuable contribution to the field of online learning and decision-making under uncertainty.