Not Eliminate but Aggregate: Post-Hoc Control over Mixture-of-Experts to Address Shortcut Shifts in Natural Language Understanding
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to address the problem of "shortcut shifts" in natural language understanding (NLU) models.
- Shortcut shifts occur when NLU models exploit spurious correlations in the training data, leading to poor performance on out-of-distribution samples.
- The authors propose a post-hoc control over mixture-of-experts framework to mitigate this issue.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models like those used for natural language understanding often rely on "shortcuts" or surface-level patterns in the training data to make predictions. This can work well on the data the model was trained on, but can lead to poor performance when the model is presented with new, different data.
The researchers in this paper have developed a new approach to address this problem. Instead of trying to eliminate these shortcuts entirely, which can be challenging, they propose a method to "aggregate" or combine the outputs of multiple specialized "expert" models. By blending the outputs of these experts, the final model can leverage the different strengths of each one to make more robust and accurate predictions, even when faced with new types of data that don't match the original training set.
This post-hoc control over mixture-of-experts approach allows the model to adapt and adjust its behavior after training, without having to go back and retrain the entire system from scratch. The key idea is to have multiple specialized experts handle different aspects of the task, and then intelligently combine their outputs to get the best of all worlds.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a post-hoc control over mixture-of-experts framework to address the problem of "shortcut shifts" in natural language understanding (NLU) models. Shortcut shifts occur when NLU models exploit spurious correlations in the training data, leading to poor performance on out-of-distribution samples.
The authors' approach involves training a mixture-of-experts (MoE) model, where each "expert" is a specialized model trained on a different aspect of the task. During inference, the outputs of these experts are combined using a gating network that learns to weight the contributions of each expert based on the input.
Crucially, the authors introduce a post-hoc control mechanism that allows the model to adjust the expert weights in response to observed shortcut shifts. This is done by analyzing the model's predictions on a held-out "shift" dataset and then updating the gating network accordingly.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several NLU benchmarks, including investigating multi-hop factual shortcuts and selective prediction for semantic segmentation. They show that their post-hoc control method can significantly improve robustness to shortcut shifts, outperforming baseline approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the important problem of shortcut shifts in NLU models. The key strength of the method is its ability to dynamically adjust the model's behavior after training, without requiring costly retraining of the entire system.
However, the authors acknowledge that their post-hoc control mechanism relies on the availability of a dedicated "shift" dataset, which may not always be practical or feasible to obtain. Additionally, the approach may be computationally expensive, as it requires training multiple expert models and continuously updating the gating network.
Further research could explore ways to learn more generalized experts by merging experts, or to make the post-hoc control process more efficient and scalable. It would also be valuable to test the method on a wider range of NLU tasks and datasets to better understand its broader applicability and limitations.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel post-hoc control over mixture-of-experts approach to address the problem of shortcut shifts in natural language understanding models. By training a mixture of specialized expert models and then dynamically adjusting their contributions based on observed shortcut shifts, the authors demonstrate a promising way to improve the robustness of NLU systems to out-of-distribution data. While the method has some practical limitations, it represents an important step towards building more reliable and adaptable natural language AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Not Eliminate but Aggregate: Post-Hoc Control over Mixture-of-Experts to Address Shortcut Shifts in Natural Language Understanding
Ukyo Honda, Tatsushi Oka, Peinan Zhang, Masato Mita
Recent models for natural language understanding are inclined to exploit simple patterns in datasets, commonly known as shortcuts. These shortcuts hinge on spurious correlations between labels and latent features existing in the training data. At inference time, shortcut-dependent models are likely to generate erroneous predictions under distribution shifts, particularly when some latent features are no longer correlated with the labels. To avoid this, previous studies have trained models to eliminate the reliance on shortcuts. In this study, we explore a different direction: pessimistically aggregating the predictions of a mixture-of-experts, assuming each expert captures relatively different latent features. The experimental results demonstrate that our post-hoc control over the experts significantly enhances the model's robustness to the distribution shift in shortcuts. Besides, we show that our approach has some practical advantages. We also analyze our model and provide results to support the assumption.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Post-Hoc Reversal: Are We Selecting Models Prematurely?
Rishabh Ranjan, Saurabh Garg, Mrigank Raman, Carlos Guestrin, Zachary Chase Lipton
Trained models are often composed with post-hoc transforms such as temperature scaling (TS), ensembling and stochastic weight averaging (SWA) to improve performance, robustness, uncertainty estimation, etc. However, such transforms are typically applied only after the base models have already been finalized by standard means. In this paper, we challenge this practice with an extensive empirical study. In particular, we demonstrate a phenomenon that we call post-hoc reversal, where performance trends are reversed after applying these post-hoc transforms. This phenomenon is especially prominent in high-noise settings. For example, while base models overfit badly early in training, both conventional ensembling and SWA favor base models trained for more epochs. Post-hoc reversal can also suppress the appearance of double descent and mitigate mismatches between test loss and test error seen in base models. Based on our findings, we propose post-hoc selection, a simple technique whereby post-hoc metrics inform model development decisions such as early stopping, checkpointing, and broader hyperparameter choices. Our experimental analyses span real-world vision, language, tabular and graph datasets from domains like satellite imaging, language modeling, census prediction and social network analysis. On an LLM instruction tuning dataset, post-hoc selection results in > 1.5x MMLU improvement compared to naive selection. Code is available at https://github.com/rishabh-ranjan/post-hoc-reversal.
Read more4/12/2024
💬
0
Investigating Multi-Hop Factual Shortcuts in Knowledge Editing of Large Language Models
Tianjie Ju, Yijin Chen, Xinwei Yuan, Zhuosheng Zhang, Wei Du, Yubin Zheng, Gongshen Liu
Recent work has showcased the powerful capability of large language models (LLMs) in recalling knowledge and reasoning. However, the reliability of LLMs in combining these two capabilities into reasoning through multi-hop facts has not been widely explored. This paper systematically investigates the possibilities for LLMs to utilize shortcuts based on direct connections between the initial and terminal entities of multi-hop knowledge. We first explore the existence of factual shortcuts through Knowledge Neurons, revealing that: (i) the strength of factual shortcuts is highly correlated with the frequency of co-occurrence of initial and terminal entities in the pre-training corpora; (ii) few-shot prompting leverage more shortcuts in answering multi-hop questions compared to chain-of-thought prompting. Then, we analyze the risks posed by factual shortcuts from the perspective of multi-hop knowledge editing. Analysis shows that approximately 20% of the failures are attributed to shortcuts, and the initial and terminal entities in these failure instances usually have higher co-occurrences in the pre-training corpus. Finally, we propose erasing shortcut neurons to mitigate the associated risks and find that this approach significantly reduces failures in multiple-hop knowledge editing caused by shortcuts.
Read more6/4/2024
📈
0
From Model Explanation to Data Misinterpretation: Uncovering the Pitfalls of Post Hoc Explainers in Business Research
Ronilo Ragodos (Jeffrey), Tong Wang (Jeffrey), Lu Feng (Jeffrey), Yu (Jeffrey), Hu
Machine learning models have been increasingly used in business research. However, most state-of-the-art machine learning models, such as deep neural networks and XGBoost, are black boxes in nature. Therefore, post hoc explainers that provide explanations for machine learning models by, for example, estimating numerical importance of the input features, have been gaining wide usage. Despite the intended use of post hoc explainers being explaining machine learning models, we found a growing trend in business research where post hoc explanations are used to draw inferences about the data. In this work, we investigate the validity of such use. Specifically, we investigate with extensive experiments whether the explanations obtained by the two most popular post hoc explainers, SHAP and LIME, provide correct information about the true marginal effects of X on Y in the data, which we call data-alignment. We then identify what factors influence the alignment of explanations. Finally, we propose a set of mitigation strategies to improve the data-alignment of explanations and demonstrate their effectiveness with real-world data in an econometric context. In spite of this effort, we nevertheless conclude that it is often not appropriate to infer data insights from post hoc explanations. We articulate appropriate alternative uses, the most important of which is to facilitate the proposition and subsequent empirical investigation of hypotheses. The ultimate goal of this paper is to caution business researchers against translating post hoc explanations of machine learning models into potentially false insights and understanding of data.
Read more9/2/2024