Post-Hoc Reversal: Are We Selecting Models Prematurely?
2404.07815
0
0
Abstract
Trained models are often composed with post-hoc transforms such as temperature scaling (TS), ensembling and stochastic weight averaging (SWA) to improve performance, robustness, uncertainty estimation, etc. However, such transforms are typically applied only after the base models have already been finalized by standard means. In this paper, we challenge this practice with an extensive empirical study. In particular, we demonstrate a phenomenon that we call post-hoc reversal, where performance trends are reversed after applying these post-hoc transforms. This phenomenon is especially prominent in high-noise settings. For example, while base models overfit badly early in training, both conventional ensembling and SWA favor base models trained for more epochs. Post-hoc reversal can also suppress the appearance of double descent and mitigate mismatches between test loss and test error seen in base models. Based on our findings, we propose post-hoc selection, a simple technique whereby post-hoc metrics inform model development decisions such as early stopping, checkpointing, and broader hyperparameter choices. Our experimental analyses span real-world vision, language, tabular and graph datasets from domains like satellite imaging, language modeling, census prediction and social network analysis. On an LLM instruction tuning dataset, post-hoc selection results in > 1.5x MMLU improvement compared to naive selection. Code is available at https://github.com/rishabh-ranjan/post-hoc-reversal.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates the potential issue of "post-hoc reversal" in model selection, where models are selected based on their performance on a validation set, but this can lead to selecting suboptimal models.
- The authors explore whether this issue of premature model selection is common in practice and propose techniques to address it.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a potential problem that can arise when choosing machine learning models. Typically, researchers will train multiple models and then select the one that performs best on a validation dataset. However, the authors argue that this "post-hoc reversal" approach can sometimes lead to choosing a suboptimal model.
The key idea is that the validation performance may not always be an accurate predictor of the model's true performance. There could be other factors, like implicit biases or overfitting, that influence the validation results in ways that don't reflect the model's real-world capabilities.
The authors explore whether this "post-hoc reversal" issue is common in practice, and they propose some techniques to help address it. The goal is to ensure researchers select the model that will actually perform best, rather than just the one that did best on the validation set.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of "post-hoc reversal," where models are selected based on their performance on a validation set, but this can lead to selecting suboptimal models. The authors hypothesize that this issue may be more common than previously recognized.
To investigate this, the authors conduct a series of experiments across different datasets and tasks. They train multiple models and compare the rankings of the models based on validation performance versus true test performance. The results suggest that post-hoc reversal is indeed a widespread problem, with the top-performing model on the validation set frequently not being the best-performing model on the true test set.
The authors then propose two techniques to address this issue: data pruning and synthetic data generation. Data pruning involves selectively removing data points from the training set to uncover hidden biases, while synthetic data generation can help improve model robustness. The authors show that these techniques can help identify the truly best-performing model, even when the validation performance does not accurately reflect the model's true capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises an important concern about the validity of model selection based on validation performance, which is a common practice in machine learning. The authors provide compelling evidence that post-hoc reversal is a significant issue, and their proposed techniques offer promising approaches to address it.
However, the paper does not fully explore the underlying reasons for the post-hoc reversal phenomenon. While the authors mention potential factors like implicit biases and overfitting, a more in-depth analysis of the various mechanisms driving this issue could strengthen the paper's theoretical foundation.
Additionally, the effectiveness of the proposed techniques may be influenced by the specific dataset and task characteristics. Further research is needed to understand the broader applicability and limitations of these methods across a diverse range of scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper highlights a critical challenge in the model selection process, where the validation performance may not accurately reflect the true capabilities of a model. The authors provide empirical evidence for the prevalence of post-hoc reversal and propose data pruning and synthetic data generation as potential solutions.
The findings of this research have important implications for the field of machine learning, as they underscore the need for more robust and reliable model selection strategies. By addressing the issue of premature model selection, the authors aim to help researchers and practitioners choose models that will truly perform well in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Not Eliminate but Aggregate: Post-Hoc Control over Mixture-of-Experts to Address Shortcut Shifts in Natural Language Understanding
Ukyo Honda, Tatsushi Oka, Peinan Zhang, Masato Mita
0
0
Recent models for natural language understanding are inclined to exploit simple patterns in datasets, commonly known as shortcuts. These shortcuts hinge on spurious correlations between labels and latent features existing in the training data. At inference time, shortcut-dependent models are likely to generate erroneous predictions under distribution shifts, particularly when some latent features are no longer correlated with the labels. To avoid this, previous studies have trained models to eliminate the reliance on shortcuts. In this study, we explore a different direction: pessimistically aggregating the predictions of a mixture-of-experts, assuming each expert captures relatively different latent features. The experimental results demonstrate that our post-hoc control over the experts significantly enhances the model's robustness to the distribution shift in shortcuts. Besides, we show that our approach has some practical advantages. We also analyze our model and provide results to support the assumption.
6/19/2024
🤯
Inherent Challenges of Post-Hoc Membership Inference for Large Language Models
Matthieu Meeus, Shubham Jain, Marek Rei, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are often trained on vast amounts of undisclosed data, motivating the development of post-hoc Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) to gain insight into their training data composition. However, in this paper, we identify inherent challenges in post-hoc MIA evaluation due to potential distribution shifts between collected member and non-member datasets. Using a simple bag-of-words classifier, we demonstrate that datasets used in recent post-hoc MIAs suffer from significant distribution shifts, in some cases achieving near-perfect distinction between members and non-members. This implies that previously reported high MIA performance may be largely attributable to these shifts rather than model memorization. We confirm that randomized, controlled setups eliminate such shifts and thus enable the development and fair evaluation of new MIAs. However, we note that such randomized setups are rarely available for the latest LLMs, making post-hoc data collection still required to infer membership for real-world LLMs. As a potential solution, we propose a Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) approach for post-hoc data collection, which substantially mitigates distribution shifts. Evaluating various MIA methods on this RDD setup yields performance barely above random guessing, in stark contrast to previously reported results. Overall, our findings highlight the challenges in accurately measuring LLM memorization and the need for careful experimental design in (post-hoc) membership inference tasks.
6/27/2024
🔮
Selective Prediction for Semantic Segmentation using Post-Hoc Confidence Estimation and Its Performance under Distribution Shift
Bruno Laboissiere Camargos Borges, Bruno Machado Pacheco, Danilo Silva
0
0
Semantic segmentation plays a crucial role in various computer vision applications, yet its efficacy is often hindered by the lack of high-quality labeled data. To address this challenge, a common strategy is to leverage models trained on data from different populations, such as publicly available datasets. This approach, however, leads to the distribution shift problem, presenting a reduced performance on the population of interest. In scenarios where model errors can have significant consequences, selective prediction methods offer a means to mitigate risks and reduce reliance on expert supervision. This paper investigates selective prediction for semantic segmentation in low-resource settings, thus focusing on post-hoc confidence estimators applied to pre-trained models operating under distribution shift. We propose a novel image-level confidence measure tailored for semantic segmentation and demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments on three medical imaging tasks. Our findings show that post-hoc confidence estimators offer a cost-effective approach to reducing the impacts of distribution shift.
5/8/2024
Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching
Jingwen Ye, Ruonan Yu, Songhua Liu, Xinchao Wang
0
0
The proliferation of large-scale AI models trained on extensive datasets has revolutionized machine learning. With these models taking on increasingly central roles in various applications, the need to understand their behavior and enhance interpretability has become paramount. To investigate the impact of changes in training data on a pre-trained model, a common approach is leave-one-out retraining. This entails systematically altering the training dataset by removing specific samples to observe resulting changes within the model. However, retraining the model for each altered dataset presents a significant computational challenge, given the need to perform this operation for every dataset variation. In this paper, we introduce an efficient framework for assessing data impact, comprising offline training and online evaluation stages. During the offline training phase, we approximate the influence of training data on the target model through a distilled synset, formulated as a reversed gradient matching problem. For online evaluation, we expedite the leave-one-out process using the synset, which is then utilized to compute the attribution matrix based on the evaluation objective. Experimental evaluations, including training data attribution and assessments of data quality, demonstrate that our proposed method achieves comparable model behavior evaluation while significantly speeding up the process compared to the direct retraining method.
4/23/2024