Opinion Dynamics with Set-Based Confidence: Convergence Criteria and Periodic Solutions
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses a model of opinion dynamics with set-based confidence, exploring convergence criteria and periodic solutions.
- It analyzes how agents in a social network update their opinions based on interactions with others, considering the confidence they have in their opinions.
- The paper provides theoretical results on the convergence and periodic behavior of the opinion dynamics under this set-based confidence model.
Plain English Explanation
In this research, the authors study how people's opinions can change over time in a social network. They focus on a specific model where each person has a range or "set" of opinions they are confident in, rather than a single fixed opinion.
The key idea is that when people interact with others, they update their range of opinions based on how confident they are in their current views. If they are very confident, they may only slightly adjust their opinions. But if they are less confident, they may significantly change their views to align more with their peers.
The researchers provide mathematical proofs to understand when this opinion dynamics model will converge to a stable state, where everyone's opinions stop changing. They also identify conditions under which the opinions can exhibit periodic patterns, repeatedly cycling between different states over time.
These theoretical results help us better comprehend the complex dynamics that can arise in social networks, where people's opinions are constantly shifting based on their interactions and confidence levels. The findings could inform the design of systems that aim to promote the spread of beneficial ideas or mitigate the impact of misinformation.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a model of opinion dynamics where each agent has a set-based confidence interval representing their opinions, rather than a single fixed opinion.
The authors analyze how these agents update their opinion sets based on interactions with their neighbors in a social network. The key update rule is that agents shift their opinion sets towards the intersection of their current set and their neighbors' sets, with the degree of shift determined by their confidence level.
The researchers then derive convergence criteria for this opinion dynamics model, identifying conditions under which the system will stabilize to a fixed point. They also characterize the periodic solutions that can arise, where the opinions repeatedly cycle through different states over time.
These theoretical results provide insights into the complex dynamics that can emerge in social networks where people's opinions are not fixed but rather evolve based on their interactions and confidence levels. The findings could inform the design of opinion dynamic models that aim to promote the spread of beneficial ideas or mitigate the impact of stubborn agents propagating misinformation.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of an opinion dynamics model with set-based confidence, deriving important theoretical results on convergence and periodic behavior. However, the authors acknowledge that the model makes several simplifying assumptions, such as the specific update rule and the structure of the social network.
In practice, real-world social networks and opinion formation processes are likely more complex, with factors like individual biases, the spread of misinformation, and the influence of external events playing a significant role. Further research is needed to understand how these additional elements might impact the dynamics predicted by the current model.
Additionally, the theoretical analysis focuses on the mathematical properties of the system, without explicitly considering the real-world implications or practical applications of the findings. Future work could explore how the insights from this research could be leveraged to design more effective opinion dynamics models or inform interventions aimed at promoting the spread of beneficial ideas in social networks.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel model of opinion dynamics that incorporates set-based confidence, rather than fixed opinions. The authors derive important theoretical results on the convergence and periodic behavior of this model, providing insights into the complex dynamics that can arise in social networks where people's views are constantly evolving based on their interactions and confidence levels.
While the model makes simplifying assumptions, the findings could inform the development of more sophisticated opinion dynamic frameworks that better capture the nuances of real-world opinion formation and spread. Further research is needed to explore the practical applications and implications of this work, and to understand how additional factors might influence the predicted dynamics.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Opinion Dynamics with Set-Based Confidence: Convergence Criteria and Periodic Solutions
Iryna Zabarianska, Anton V. Proskurnikov
This paper introduces a new multidimensional extension of the Hegselmann-Krause (HK) opinion dynamics model, where opinion proximity is not determined by a norm or metric. Instead, each agent trusts opinions within the Minkowski sum $xi+mathcal{O}$, where $xi$ is the agent's current opinion and $mathcal{O}$ is the confidence set defining acceptable deviations. During each iteration, agents update their opinions by simultaneously averaging the trusted opinions. Unlike traditional HK systems, where $mathcal{O}$ is a ball in some norm, our model allows the confidence set to be non-convex and even unbounded. We demonstrate that the new model, referred to as SCOD (Set-based Confidence Opinion Dynamics), can exhibit properties absent in the conventional HK model. Some solutions may converge to non-equilibrium points in the state space, while others oscillate periodically. These ``pathologies'' disappear if the set $mathcal{O}$ is symmetric and contains zero in its interior: similar to the usual HK model, SCOD then converges in a finite number of iterations to one of the equilibrium points. The latter property is also preserved if one agent is stubborn and resists changing their opinion, yet still influences the others; however, two stubborn agents can lead to oscillations.
Read more8/6/2024
✨
0
Opinion Dynamics Incorporating Higher-Order Interactions
Zuobai Zhang, Wanyue Xu, Zhongzhi Zhang, Guanrong Chen
The issue of opinion sharing and formation has received considerable attention in the academic literature, and a few models have been proposed to study this problem. However, existing models are limited to the interactions among nearest neighbors, ignoring those second, third, and higher-order neighbors, despite the fact that higher-order interactions occur frequently in real social networks. In this paper, we develop a new model for opinion dynamics by incorporating long-range interactions based on higher-order random walks. We prove that the model converges to a fixed opinion vector, which may differ greatly from those models without higher-order interactions. Since direct computation of the equilibrium opinion is computationally expensive, which involves the operations of huge-scale matrix multiplication and inversion, we design a theoretically convergence-guaranteed estimation algorithm that approximates the equilibrium opinion vector nearly linearly in both space and time with respect to the number of edges in the graph. We conduct extensive experiments on various social networks, demonstrating that the new algorithm is both highly efficient and effective.
Read more8/15/2024
🎯
0
Asynchronous Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
Petra Berenbrink, Martin Hoefer, Dominik Kaaser, Pascal Lenzner, Malin Rau, Daniel Schmand
Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. The model by Hegselmann and Krause is a well-known theoretical model to study such opinion formation processes in social networks. In contrast to many other theoretical models, it does not converge towards a situation where all agents agree on the same opinion. Instead, it assumes that people find an opinion reasonable if and only if it is close to their own. The system converges towards a stable situation where agents sharing the same opinion form a cluster, and agents in different clusters do not mbox{influence each other.} We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model where agents are connected by a social network and their opinions evolve in an iterative process. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion. By this, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. To the best of our knowledge, social Hegselmann-Krause systems with asynchronous opinion updates have only been studied with the complete graph as social network. We show that such opinion dynamics with random agent activation are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n|E|^2 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$ on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where $|E|$ is the number of edges of the social network. For the complete social network we show a bound of $mathcal{O}(n^3(n^2 + (varepsilon/delta)^2))$ that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n^9 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$. Our bounds are complemented by simulations that indicate asymptotically matching lower bounds.
Read more4/16/2024
0
Opinion Dynamics for Utility Maximizing Agents: Exploring the Impact of Resource Penalty
Prashil Wankhede, Nirabhra Mandal, Sonia Mart'inez, Pavankumar Tallapragada
We propose a continuous-time nonlinear model of opinion dynamics with utility-maximizing agents connected via a social influence network. A distinguishing feature of the proposed model is the inclusion of an opinion-dependent resource-penalty term in the utilities, which limits the agents from holding opinions of large magnitude. The proposed utility functions also account for how the relative resources within the social group affect both an agent's stubbornness and social influence. Each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility by revising its opinion in the gradient ascent direction of its utility function, thus leading to the proposed opinion dynamics. We show that, for any arbitrary social influence network, opinions are ultimately bounded. For networks with weak antagonistic relations, we show that there exists a globally exponentially stable equilibrium using contraction theory. We establish conditions for the existence of consensus equilibrium and analyze the relative dominance of the agents at consensus. We also conduct a game-theoretic analysis of the underlying opinion formation game, including on Nash equilibria and on prices of anarchy in terms of satisfaction ratios. Additionally, we also investigate the oscillatory behavior of opinions in a two-agent scenario. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.
Read more4/9/2024