Ponder: Online Prediction of Task Memory Requirements for Scientific Workflows
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses an approach called "Ponder" for predicting the memory requirements of tasks in scientific workflows.
- Ponder aims to provide accurate online memory predictions to improve workflow scheduling and resource utilization.
- The authors evaluate Ponder's performance on real-world scientific workflows running on Kubernetes.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a system called Ponder that can predict the amount of memory needed by individual tasks in a scientific workflow. This is important because workflows often involve many different computational steps, and each step may have varying memory requirements.
By accurately predicting the memory needs of each task, Ponder can help schedule the workflow more efficiently on computing resources like Kubernetes. This can lead to faster workflow execution and better utilization of the available hardware.
The key idea behind Ponder is to collect data about the memory usage of past workflow tasks and use machine learning to build a model that can predict the memory requirements of new tasks. This allows Ponder to make real-time memory predictions without needing to fully execute the task first.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the design and implementation of the Ponder system. Ponder operates in two phases:
-
Offline Training: In this phase, Ponder collects historical data about the memory usage of tasks in the scientific workflow. It then uses this data to train a machine learning model that can predict the memory requirements of new tasks.
-
Online Prediction: When a new task is submitted to the workflow, Ponder uses the trained model to quickly predict the task's memory needs. This prediction is then used to schedule the task on appropriate computing resources.
The authors evaluate Ponder's performance on several real-world scientific workflows running on a Kubernetes cluster. They compare Ponder's predictions to the actual memory usage of the tasks and show that Ponder can provide accurate forecasts, leading to better resource utilization and workflow execution times.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the Ponder system and demonstrates its effectiveness in predicting task memory requirements for scientific workflows. However, the authors acknowledge a few limitations:
- The accuracy of Ponder's predictions may be affected by changes in the workflow code or input data over time. Ongoing model retraining may be necessary to maintain performance.
- Ponder's effectiveness relies on having sufficient historical data to train the predictive model. For new workflows or tasks with limited prior execution data, the predictions may be less reliable.
- The paper focuses on memory prediction, but other resource requirements (e.g., CPU, disk, network) could also be important for efficient workflow scheduling.
Future research could address these limitations by exploring techniques for adaptive model updating, data augmentation, and multi-resource prediction and optimization.
Conclusion
The Ponder system presented in this paper offers a promising approach for improving the efficiency of scientific workflows by providing accurate online predictions of task memory requirements. By leveraging machine learning to forecast memory usage, Ponder can help schedule workflow tasks more effectively, leading to faster execution times and better utilization of computing resources. While the paper identifies some areas for further research, the results demonstrate the value of data-driven memory prediction in the context of scientific workflows.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Ponder: Online Prediction of Task Memory Requirements for Scientific Workflows
Fabian Lehmann, Jonathan Bader, Ninon De Mecquenem, Xing Wang, Vasilis Bountris, Florian Friederici, Ulf Leser, Lauritz Thamsen
Scientific workflows are used to analyze large amounts of data. These workflows comprise numerous tasks, many of which are executed repeatedly, running the same custom program on different inputs. Users specify resource allocations for each task, which must be sufficient for all inputs to prevent task failures. As a result, task memory allocations tend to be overly conservative, wasting precious cluster resources, limiting overall parallelism, and increasing workflow makespan. In this paper, we first benchmark a state-of-the-art method on four real-life workflows from the nf-core workflow repository. This analysis reveals that certain assumptions underlying current prediction methods, which typically were evaluated only on simulated workflows, cannot generally be confirmed for real workflows and executions. We then present Ponder, a new online task-sizing strategy that considers and chooses between different methods to cater to different memory demand patterns. We implemented Ponder for Nextflow and made the code publicly available. In an experimental evaluation that also considers the impact of memory predictions on scheduling, Ponder improves Memory Allocation Quality on average by 71.0% and makespan by 21.8% in comparison to a state-of-the-art method. Moreover, Ponder produces 93.8% fewer task failures.
Read more8/2/2024
0
Sizey: Memory-Efficient Execution of Scientific Workflow Tasks
Jonathan Bader, Fabian Skalski, Fabian Lehmann, Dominik Scheinert, Jonathan Will, Lauritz Thamsen, Odej Kao
As the amount of available data continues to grow in fields as diverse as bioinformatics, physics, and remote sensing, the importance of scientific workflows in the design and implementation of reproducible data analysis pipelines increases. When developing workflows, resource requirements must be defined for each type of task in the workflow. Typically, task types vary widely in their computational demands because they are simply wrappers for arbitrary black-box analysis tools. Furthermore, the resource consumption for the same task type can vary considerably as well due to different inputs. Since underestimating memory resources leads to bottlenecks and task failures, workflow developers tend to overestimate memory resources. However, overprovisioning of memory wastes resources and limits cluster throughput. Addressing this problem, we propose Sizey, a novel online memory prediction method for workflow tasks. During workflow execution, Sizey simultaneously trains multiple machine learning models and then dynamically selects the best model for each workflow task. To evaluate the quality of the model, we introduce a novel resource allocation quality (RAQ) score based on memory prediction accuracy and efficiency. Sizey's prediction models are retrained and re-evaluated online during workflow execution, continuously incorporating metrics from completed tasks. Our evaluation with a prototype implementation of Sizey uses metrics from six real-world scientific workflows from the popular nf-core framework and shows a median reduction in memory waste over time of 24.68% compared to the respective best-performing state-of-the-art baseline.
Read more7/24/2024
0
KS+: Predicting Workflow Task Memory Usage Over Time
Jonathan Bader, Ansgar Lo{ss}er, Lauritz Thamsen, Bjorn Scheuermann, Odej Kao
Scientific workflow management systems enable the reproducible execution of data analysis pipelines on cluster infrastructures managed by resource managers such as Kubernetes, Slurm, or HTCondor. These resource managers require resource estimates for each workflow task to be executed on one of the cluster nodes. However, task resource consumption varies significantly between different tasks and for the same task with different inputs. Furthermore, resource consumption also fluctuates during a task's execution. As a result, manually configuring static memory allocations is error-prone, often leading users to overestimate memory usage to avoid costly failures from under-provisioning, which results in significant memory wastage. We propose KS+, a method that predicts a task's memory consumption over time depending on its inputs. For this, KS+ dynamically segments the task execution and predicts the memory required for each segment. Our experimental evaluation shows an average reduction in memory wastage of 38% compared to the best-performing state-of-the-art baseline for two real-world workflows from the popular nf-core repository.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Mapping Large Memory-constrained Workflows onto Heterogeneous Platforms
Svetlana Kulagina, Henning Meyerhenke, Anne Benoit
Scientific workflows are often represented as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), where vertices correspond to tasks and edges represent the dependencies between them. Since these graphs are often large in both the number of tasks and their resource requirements, it is important to schedule them efficiently on parallel or distributed compute systems. Typically, each task requires a certain amount of memory to be executed and needs to communicate data to its successor tasks. The goal is thus to execute the workflow as fast as possible (i.e., to minimize its makespan) while satisfying the memory constraints. Hence, we investigate the partitioning and mapping of DAG-shaped workflows onto heterogeneous platforms where each processor can have a different speed and a different memory size. We first propose a baseline algorithm in the absence of existing memory-aware solutions. As our main contribution, we then present a four-step heuristic. Its first step is to partition the input DAG into smaller blocks with an existing DAG partitioner. The next two steps adapt the resulting blocks of the DAG to fit the processor memories and optimize for the overall makespan by further splitting and merging these blocks. Finally, we use local search via block swaps to further improve the makespan. Our experimental evaluation on real-world and simulated workflows with up to 30,000 tasks shows that exploiting the heterogeneity with the four-step heuristic reduces the makespan by a factor of 2.44 on average (even more on large workflows), compared to the baseline that ignores heterogeneity.
Read more7/15/2024