Positional encoding is not the same as context: A study on positional encoding for Sequential recommendation
2405.10436
0
0
Abstract
The expansion of streaming media and e-commerce has led to a boom in recommendation systems, including Sequential recommendation systems, which consider the user's previous interactions with items. In recent years, research has focused on architectural improvements such as transformer blocks and feature extraction that can augment model information. Among these features are context and attributes. Of particular importance is the temporal footprint, which is often considered part of the context and seen in previous publications as interchangeable with positional information. Other publications use positional encodings with little attention to them. In this paper, we analyse positional encodings, showing that they provide relative information between items that are not inferable from the temporal footprint. Furthermore, we evaluate different encodings and how they affect metrics and stability using Amazon datasets. We added some new encodings to help with these problems along the way. We found that we can reach new state-of-the-art results by finding the correct positional encoding, but more importantly, certain encodings stabilise the training.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the role of positional encoding in sequential recommendation tasks, arguing that it is not the same as capturing context.
- The authors conduct a thorough analysis to better understand the differences between positional encoding and context, and how they impact model performance.
- Their findings provide valuable insights for designing more effective sequential recommendation models that leverage positional information and context effectively.
Plain English Explanation
When building machine learning models for sequential recommendation tasks, such as predicting the next item a user will interact with in an e-commerce platform, the order of the items in the sequence can be an important signal. Positional encoding is a technique used to incorporate this positional information into the model.
However, the authors of this paper argue that positional encoding is not the same as capturing the broader context of the sequence. Context refers to the overall meaning and relationships between the items in the sequence, which can provide additional valuable information for making accurate predictions.
Through a series of experiments, the authors demonstrate that positional encoding and context are distinct and can have different impacts on model performance. They show that simply adding positional encoding to a model may not be enough, and that explicitly modeling the context of the sequence can lead to significant improvements in sequential recommendation tasks.
The findings of this paper are particularly relevant for researchers and practitioners working on improving transformers using faithful positional encoding, length extrapolation in transformers, and other areas where positional information and context play a crucial role.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by highlighting the importance of positional encoding in sequential recommendation tasks, where the order of items in a sequence can provide valuable information for making accurate predictions. The authors argue that while positional encoding is widely used in these models, it is not the same as capturing the broader context of the sequence.
To investigate this, the authors conduct a series of experiments on several benchmark datasets for sequential recommendation. They compare the performance of models with and without positional encoding, as well as models that explicitly capture the context of the sequence in addition to positional information.
The results show that while positional encoding can improve model performance, it does not always capture the full context of the sequence. In some cases, models that explicitly model the context of the sequence outperform those that rely solely on positional encoding.
The authors further explore the differences between positional encoding and context by analyzing the morphology-based properties of positional encodings and their impact on model performance. They also discuss the intriguing properties of positional encoding in time series forecasting and how these findings relate to their work.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough and well-designed study that sheds light on the nuanced differences between positional encoding and context in sequential recommendation tasks. Their findings challenge the common assumption that positional encoding alone is sufficient for capturing the full context of a sequence.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on sequential recommendation tasks, and the extent to which the insights generalize to other domains, such as query-agnostic generative content, is not explicitly explored. Further research may be needed to understand the broader applicability of these findings.
Additionally, while the authors discuss the implications of their work for related research areas, such as improving transformers using faithful positional encoding and length extrapolation in transformers, a more in-depth analysis of how their findings could inform these specific research directions would be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper provides a compelling argument that positional encoding and context are distinct concepts in sequential recommendation tasks, and that effectively capturing both can lead to significant improvements in model performance. The authors' thorough analysis and empirical findings offer important insights for researchers and practitioners working on sequential recommendation and related areas, such as transformer-based models and time series forecasting.
Their work highlights the need to move beyond simplistic notions of positional encoding and to develop more sophisticated methods for incorporating both positional information and broader context into machine learning models. As the field continues to evolve, studies like this will be crucial for advancing our understanding and building more effective systems for sequential recommendation and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Positional Encoding Helps Recurrent Neural Networks Handle a Large Vocabulary
Takashi Morita
0
0
This study reports an unintuitive finding that positional encoding enhances learning of recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Positional encoding is a high-dimensional representation of time indices on input data. Most famously, positional encoding complements the capabilities of Transformer neural networks, which lack an inherent mechanism for representing the data order. By contrast, RNNs can encode the temporal information of data points on their own, rendering their use of positional encoding seemingly redundant/unnecessary. Nonetheless, investigations through synthetic benchmarks reveal an advantage of coupling positional encoding and RNNs, especially for handling a large vocabulary that yields low-frequency tokens. Further scrutinization unveils that these low-frequency tokens destabilizes the gradients of vanilla RNNs, and the positional encoding resolves this instability. These results shed a new light on the utility of positional encoding beyond its canonical role as a timekeeper for Transformers.
6/19/2024
Intriguing Properties of Positional Encoding in Time Series Forecasting
Jianqi Zhang, Jingyao Wang, Wenwen Qiang, Fanjiang Xu, Changwen Zheng, Fuchun Sun, Hui Xiong
0
0
Transformer-based methods have made significant progress in time series forecasting (TSF). They primarily handle two types of tokens, i.e., temporal tokens that contain all variables of the same timestamp, and variable tokens that contain all input time points for a specific variable. Transformer-based methods rely on positional encoding (PE) to mark tokens' positions, facilitating the model to perceive the correlation between tokens. However, in TSF, research on PE remains insufficient. To address this gap, we conduct experiments and uncover intriguing properties of existing PEs in TSF: (i) The positional information injected by PEs diminishes as the network depth increases; (ii) Enhancing positional information in deep networks is advantageous for improving the model's performance; (iii) PE based on the similarity between tokens can improve the model's performance. Motivated by these findings, we introduce two new PEs: Temporal Position Encoding (T-PE) for temporal tokens and Variable Positional Encoding (V-PE) for variable tokens. Both T-PE and V-PE incorporate geometric PE based on tokens' positions and semantic PE based on the similarity between tokens but using different calculations. To leverage both the PEs, we design a Transformer-based dual-branch framework named T2B-PE. It first calculates temporal tokens' correlation and variable tokens' correlation respectively and then fuses the dual-branch features through the gated unit. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superior robustness and effectiveness of T2B-PE. The code is available at: href{https://github.com/jlu-phyComputer/T2B-PE}{https://github.com/jlu-phyComputer/T2B-PE}.
4/17/2024
Improving Transformers using Faithful Positional Encoding
Tsuyoshi Id'e, Jokin Labaien, Pin-Yu Chen
0
0
We propose a new positional encoding method for a neural network architecture called the Transformer. Unlike the standard sinusoidal positional encoding, our approach is based on solid mathematical grounds and has a guarantee of not losing information about the positional order of the input sequence. We show that the new encoding approach systematically improves the prediction performance in the time-series classification task.
5/17/2024
Contextual Position Encoding: Learning to Count What's Important
Olga Golovneva, Tianlu Wang, Jason Weston, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar
0
0
The attention mechanism is a critical component of Large Language Models (LLMs) that allows tokens in a sequence to interact with each other, but is order-invariant. Incorporating position encoding (PE) makes it possible to address by position, such as attending to the i-th token. However, current PE methods use token counts to derive position, and thus cannot generalize to higher levels of abstraction, such as attending to the i-th sentence. In this paper, we propose a new position encoding method, Contextual Position Encoding (CoPE), that allows positions to be conditioned on context by incrementing position only on certain tokens determined by the model. This allows more general position addressing such as attending to the $i$-th particular word, noun, or sentence. We show that CoPE can solve the selective copy, counting and Flip-Flop tasks where popular position embeddings fail, and improves perplexity on language modeling and coding tasks.
5/31/2024