Prompt Chaining or Stepwise Prompt? Refinement in Text Summarization

Read original: arXiv:2406.00507 - Published 6/4/2024 by Shichao Sun, Ruifeng Yuan, Ziqiang Cao, Wenjie Li, Pengfei Liu
Total Score

0

Prompt Chaining or Stepwise Prompt? Refinement in Text Summarization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores two approaches to prompt refinement in text summarization: prompt chaining and stepwise prompt.
  • Prompt chaining involves using a sequence of prompts to iteratively refine the summarization output, while stepwise prompt involves a single prompt with multiple steps.
  • The researchers investigate the effectiveness of these approaches and provide insights into the strengths and limitations of each.

Plain English Explanation

In the field of natural language processing, researchers are constantly seeking ways to improve the quality of text summarization - the process of generating a concise overview of a longer document. One approach that has gained attention is the use of prompt engineering, where a specific instruction or "prompt" is used to guide the language model in generating the summary.

This paper examines two different strategies for refining the prompts used in text summarization: prompt chaining and stepwise prompt. Prompt chaining involves using a sequence of prompts, with each prompt building upon the previous one to gradually improve the summary. In contrast, stepwise prompt uses a single, multi-step prompt that guides the language model through a series of refinement stages.

The researchers conducted experiments to empirically study the effectiveness of these two approaches, comparing their performance on various text summarization tasks. By analyzing the results, they aim to provide insights into the strengths and limitations of each method, helping researchers and practitioners make informed decisions when designing prompt-based summarization systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores two strategies for prompt refinement in text summarization:

  1. Prompt Chaining: This approach involves using a sequence of prompts, where the output of the previous prompt is used as input for the next prompt. The idea is to iteratively refine the summarization output by breaking down the task into smaller, more manageable steps.

  2. Stepwise Prompt: In this approach, a single, multi-step prompt is used to guide the language model through a series of refinement stages. The prompt includes instructions for each step, such as identifying key information, extracting important points, and condensing the summary.

The researchers conducted experiments to compare the performance of these two approaches on various text summarization tasks. They used large language models as the basis for their summarization system and explored different prompt design strategies, including prompt selection and optimization.

The results of their experiments provide insights into the strengths and limitations of each approach. Prompt chaining, for example, may be more effective at capturing nuanced information, while stepwise prompt may be better at producing concise and coherent summaries. The researchers also discuss the trade-offs between the two approaches in terms of computational complexity, flexibility, and user experience.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and well-designed study on the use of prompt refinement strategies in text summarization. The researchers have done a commendable job in exploring the nuances of prompt chaining and stepwise prompt, and their findings offer valuable insights for the research community.

One potential limitation of the study is the lack of a detailed discussion on the potential biases that may arise in prompt-based summarization systems. The choice of prompts, their framing, and the way they are presented to the language model can have a significant impact on the output, which the authors could have addressed more explicitly.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the long-term implications of these prompt refinement strategies, such as their scalability, generalizability, and the potential for unintended consequences. Exploring these aspects could have further strengthened the contribution of the research.

Despite these minor caveats, the paper represents a solid contribution to the field of text summarization and prompt engineering. The researchers have presented a thorough and thoughtful analysis that will undoubtedly inspire further research in this domain.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive exploration of two prompt refinement strategies, prompt chaining and stepwise prompt, in the context of text summarization. The researchers have conducted a series of experiments to compare the effectiveness of these approaches and have offered valuable insights into their strengths and limitations.

The findings from this study have important implications for the design and development of prompt-based summarization systems, as they highlight the trade-offs between the two approaches and the factors to consider when choosing the most appropriate strategy for a given task or application. The insights gained from this research can also inform the broader field of prompt engineering, contributing to the ongoing efforts to harness the full potential of large language models in natural language processing.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Prompt Chaining or Stepwise Prompt? Refinement in Text Summarization
Total Score

0

Prompt Chaining or Stepwise Prompt? Refinement in Text Summarization

Shichao Sun, Ruifeng Yuan, Ziqiang Cao, Wenjie Li, Pengfei Liu

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the capacity to improve summary quality by mirroring a human-like iterative process of critique and refinement starting from the initial draft. Two strategies are designed to perform this iterative process: Prompt Chaining and Stepwise Prompt. Prompt chaining orchestrates the drafting, critiquing, and refining phases through a series of three discrete prompts, while Stepwise prompt integrates these phases within a single prompt. However, the relative effectiveness of the two methods has not been extensively studied. This paper is dedicated to examining and comparing these two methods in the context of text summarization to ascertain which method stands out as the most effective. Experimental results show that the prompt chaining method can produce a more favorable outcome. This might be because stepwise prompt might produce a simulated refinement process according to our various experiments. Since refinement is adaptable to diverse tasks, our conclusions have the potential to be extrapolated to other applications, thereby offering insights that may contribute to the broader development of LLMs.

Read more

6/4/2024

Prompt Design and Engineering: Introduction and Advanced Methods
Total Score

1

Prompt Design and Engineering: Introduction and Advanced Methods

Xavier Amatriain

Prompt design and engineering has rapidly become essential for maximizing the potential of large language models. In this paper, we introduce core concepts, advanced techniques like Chain-of-Thought and Reflection, and the principles behind building LLM-based agents. Finally, we provide a survey of tools for prompt engineers.

Read more

5/7/2024

Towards Dataset-scale and Feature-oriented Evaluation of Text Summarization in Large Language Model Prompts
Total Score

0

Towards Dataset-scale and Feature-oriented Evaluation of Text Summarization in Large Language Model Prompts

Sam Yu-Te Lee, Aryaman Bahukhandi, Dongyu Liu, Kwan-Liu Ma

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Prompt Engineering have made chatbot customization more accessible, significantly reducing barriers to tasks that previously required programming skills. However, prompt evaluation, especially at the dataset scale, remains complex due to the need to assess prompts across thousands of test instances within a dataset. Our study, based on a comprehensive literature review and pilot study, summarized five critical challenges in prompt evaluation. In response, we introduce a feature-oriented workflow for systematic prompt evaluation. In the context of text summarization, our workflow advocates evaluation with summary characteristics (feature metrics) such as complexity, formality, or naturalness, instead of using traditional quality metrics like ROUGE. This design choice enables a more user-friendly evaluation of prompts, as it guides users in sorting through the ambiguity inherent in natural language. To support this workflow, we introduce Awesum, a visual analytics system that facilitates identifying optimal prompt refinements for text summarization through interactive visualizations, featuring a novel Prompt Comparator design that employs a BubbleSet-inspired design enhanced by dimensionality reduction techniques. We evaluate the effectiveness and general applicability of the system with practitioners from various domains and found that (1) our design helps overcome the learning curve for non-technical people to conduct a systematic evaluation of summarization prompts, and (2) our feature-oriented workflow has the potential to generalize to other NLG and image-generation tasks. For future works, we advocate moving towards feature-oriented evaluation of LLM prompts and discuss unsolved challenges in terms of human-agent interaction.

Read more

9/11/2024

A Preliminary Empirical Study on Prompt-based Unsupervised Keyphrase Extraction
Total Score

0

A Preliminary Empirical Study on Prompt-based Unsupervised Keyphrase Extraction

Mingyang Song, Yi Feng, Liping Jing

Pre-trained large language models can perform natural language processing downstream tasks by conditioning on human-designed prompts. However, a prompt-based approach often requires prompt engineering to design different prompts, primarily hand-crafted through laborious trial and error, requiring human intervention and expertise. It is a challenging problem when constructing a prompt-based keyphrase extraction method. Therefore, we investigate and study the effectiveness of different prompts on the keyphrase extraction task to verify the impact of the cherry-picked prompts on the performance of extracting keyphrases. Extensive experimental results on six benchmark keyphrase extraction datasets and different pre-trained large language models demonstrate that (1) designing complex prompts may not necessarily be more effective than designing simple prompts; (2) individual keyword changes in the designed prompts can affect the overall performance; (3) designing complex prompts achieve better performance than designing simple prompts when facing long documents.

Read more

5/28/2024