PRompt Optimization in Multi-Step Tasks (PROMST): Integrating Human Feedback and Heuristic-based Sampling

Overview

• This research paper focuses on the challenge of optimizing prompts for large language models (LLMs) in complex, multi-step tasks.
• While LLMs have been successfully used to help find and improve prompts for single-step tasks, multi-step tasks introduce new challenges:
  • Prompt content is more extensive and complex, making it harder for LLMs to analyze errors.
  • The impact of individual steps is difficult to evaluate.
  • Different people may have varied preferences about task execution.
• The researchers introduce a new LLM-driven discrete prompt optimization framework called PROMST that incorporates human-designed feedback rules to automatically suggest prompt improvements.
• PROMST also uses an extra learned heuristic model to predict prompt performance and efficiently sample from prompt candidates.
• This approach significantly outperforms both human-engineered prompts and several other prompt optimization methods across 11 representative multi-step tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have been used to help find and improve prompts, which are the instructions given to the model, for single-step tasks. However, real-world tasks often involve multiple steps, which introduces new challenges.

For multi-step tasks, the prompts are likely to be more complex and extensive, making it harder for the LLMs to analyze where things are going wrong. It's also difficult to evaluate the impact of each individual step in the process. Additionally, different people may have different preferences for how the task should be executed.

To address these challenges, the researchers developed a new system called PROMST. PROMST uses the LLM to automatically analyze the prompts and provide suggestions for how to improve them. It also includes a separate machine learning model that helps predict how well a prompt will perform, which allows the system to efficiently try out different prompt variations.

Compared to both human-designed prompts and other prompt optimization methods, PROMST significantly improves the performance on a wide range of multi-step tasks. This research could serve as an important benchmark for developing better ways to optimize prompts for complex, real-world applications of LLMs.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new LLM-driven discrete prompt optimization framework called PROMST that addresses the challenges of optimizing prompts for multi-step tasks.

PROMST incorporates human-designed feedback rules to automatically provide direct suggestions for improving prompts. It also uses an extra learned heuristic model that predicts prompt performance to efficiently sample from prompt candidates.

The researchers evaluate PROMST across 11 representative multi-step tasks and find that it significantly outperforms both human-engineered prompts and several other prompt optimization methods, including language model prompt selection via simulation optimization, PromptWizard, prompt optimization with human feedback, task facet learning, and optimizing instructions and demonstrations for multi-stage language models.

The average improvements range from 10.6% to 29.3% compared to the current best methods on five different LLMs. The researchers believe this work can serve as a valuable benchmark for automatic prompt optimization for LLM-driven multi-step tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the challenge of prompt optimization for complex, multi-step tasks. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

1. The paper does not provide much detail on the specific human-designed feedback rules used in PROMST. More information on the development and evaluation of these rules would be helpful.

2. The performance of PROMST is evaluated on a relatively small set of 11 tasks. It would be valuable to see how it generalizes to a wider range of multi-step scenarios, including real-world applications.

3. The paper does not discuss the computational cost and time required for the prompt optimization process. Understanding the tradeoffs between performance gains and efficiency would be important for practical deployment.

4. While PROMST outperforms other prompt optimization methods, it is not clear how much of an improvement it offers over simply having humans design the prompts. Further research could explore the specific types of tasks and scenarios where the automated approach provides the most value.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in addressing the challenges of prompt optimization for complex, multi-step tasks using large language models. Continued work in this area could lead to significant advancements in the practical application of these powerful AI systems.

Conclusion

This research paper introduces a new LLM-driven prompt optimization framework called PROMST that addresses the challenges of optimizing prompts for multi-step tasks. PROMST incorporates human-designed feedback rules and a learned heuristic model to efficiently suggest prompt improvements.

The authors demonstrate that PROMST significantly outperforms both human-engineered prompts and other prompt optimization methods across a range of multi-step tasks. This work can serve as an important benchmark for developing better ways to optimize prompts for complex, real-world applications of large language models.

While the paper presents a promising approach, there are still some areas for further research, such as exploring the generalization of the method to a wider range of tasks and understanding the computational tradeoffs. Overall, this research represents an important step forward in addressing a key challenge in the practical application of large language models.