Quantifying and Enhancing Multi-modal Robustness with Modality Preference
2402.06244
0
0
Abstract
Multi-modal models have shown a promising capability to effectively integrate information from various sources, yet meanwhile, they are found vulnerable to pervasive perturbations, such as uni-modal attacks and missing conditions. To counter these perturbations, robust multi-modal representations are highly expected, which are positioned well away from the discriminative multi-modal decision boundary. In this paper, different from conventional empirical studies, we focus on a commonly used joint multi-modal framework and theoretically discover that larger uni-modal representation margins and more reliable integration for modalities are essential components for achieving higher robustness. This discovery can further explain the limitation of multi-modal robustness and the phenomenon that multi-modal models are often vulnerable to attacks on the specific modality. Moreover, our analysis reveals how the widespread issue, that the model has different preferences for modalities, limits the multi-modal robustness by influencing the essential components and could lead to attacks on the specific modality highly effective. Inspired by our theoretical finding, we introduce a training procedure called Certifiable Robust Multi-modal Training (CRMT), which can alleviate this influence from modality preference and explicitly regulate essential components to significantly improve robustness in a certifiable manner. Our method demonstrates substantial improvements in performance and robustness compared with existing methods. Furthermore, our training procedure can be easily extended to enhance other robust training strategies, highlighting its credibility and flexibility.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper focuses on quantifying and enhancing the robustness of multi-modal machine learning models, which leverage multiple input modalities (e.g., text, image, audio) to make predictions.
- The key idea is to introduce a "modality preference" mechanism that allows the model to dynamically adjust the importance of different input modalities based on their individual robustness to various types of perturbations or adversarial attacks.
- The researchers propose several techniques to measure and improve the multi-modal robustness of models, with the goal of creating more reliable and trustworthy AI systems that can operate in complex, real-world environments.
Plain English Explanation
Multi-modal machine learning models are a type of AI system that can use a combination of different input types, such as text, images, and audio, to make predictions or decisions. These models can be more powerful and accurate than models that rely on a single input type.
However, multi-modal models can also be more vulnerable to different types of attacks or perturbations that can fool the model and cause it to make mistakes. For example, an image-based model might be susceptible to adversarial attacks that add small, imperceptible changes to an image to trick the model.
This research paper proposes a new technique called "modality preference" to address this problem. The idea is to let the multi-modal model dynamically adjust how much it relies on each input modality, based on how robust or vulnerable that modality is to different types of attacks. This way, the model can focus more on the more reliable input sources and be less influenced by the more vulnerable ones, making the overall system more robust and trustworthy.
The researchers also develop methods to measure the robustness of individual input modalities, which can help identify the weak points in a multi-modal model and guide the development of more secure and reliable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contributions of this paper are:
-
Modality Preference: The researchers introduce a modality preference mechanism that allows a multi-modal model to dynamically adjust the importance (or "preference") it gives to each input modality based on their individual robustness. This is achieved by adding a learnable parameter to the model's architecture that controls the weighting of each modality.
-
Robustness Quantification: The paper proposes several methods to measure the robustness of individual input modalities, including evaluating the model's performance under different types of perturbations or adversarial attacks. This provides insights into the vulnerabilities of each modality and guides the development of the modality preference mechanism.
-
Robustness Enhancement: Building on the robustness quantification techniques, the researchers develop strategies to enhance the overall robustness of multi-modal models. This includes training the modality preference mechanism to prioritize more robust modalities, as well as techniques to jointly train the model's multimodal representation to be more resilient to perturbations.
The experiments in the paper demonstrate that the proposed modality preference approach can significantly improve the robustness of multi-modal models across a range of benchmarks and attack scenarios, compared to baseline models that do not have this capability.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation into the important problem of enhancing the robustness of multi-modal AI systems. The modality preference mechanism is a clever and intuitive solution to the challenge of dynamically adapting to the varying vulnerabilities of different input modalities.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, the proposed techniques rely on the ability to accurately measure the robustness of individual modalities, which may be challenging in real-world scenarios with complex, high-dimensional inputs. Additionally, the paper focuses on relatively simple perturbation-based attacks, and it's unclear how the modality preference approach would scale to more sophisticated adversarial attacks.
Future research could explore ways to make the robustness quantification more robust and generalizable, as well as investigate the performance of the modality preference mechanism against a wider range of attack vectors. Incorporating techniques from provable defense could also help strengthen the security guarantees of these multi-modal systems.
Conclusion
This research paper presents an important step forward in creating more robust and reliable multi-modal machine learning models. By introducing a modality preference mechanism that dynamically adjusts the importance of different input sources based on their individual robustness, the researchers have developed a promising approach to enhance the overall security and trustworthiness of these AI systems.
As multi-modal models become more prevalent in real-world applications, techniques like those proposed in this paper will be crucial for ensuring the safe and reliable deployment of these technologies. The insights and methods outlined in this work could have far-reaching implications for the development of more secure and dependable AI systems that can operate effectively in complex, adversarial environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MMCert: Provable Defense against Adversarial Attacks to Multi-modal Models
Yanting Wang, Hongye Fu, Wei Zou, Jinyuan Jia
0
0
Different from a unimodal model whose input is from a single modality, the input (called multi-modal input) of a multi-modal model is from multiple modalities such as image, 3D points, audio, text, etc. Similar to unimodal models, many existing studies show that a multi-modal model is also vulnerable to adversarial perturbation, where an attacker could add small perturbation to all modalities of a multi-modal input such that the multi-modal model makes incorrect predictions for it. Existing certified defenses are mostly designed for unimodal models, which achieve sub-optimal certified robustness guarantees when extended to multi-modal models as shown in our experimental results. In our work, we propose MMCert, the first certified defense against adversarial attacks to a multi-modal model. We derive a lower bound on the performance of our MMCert under arbitrary adversarial attacks with bounded perturbations to both modalities (e.g., in the context of auto-driving, we bound the number of changed pixels in both RGB image and depth image). We evaluate our MMCert using two benchmark datasets: one for the multi-modal road segmentation task and the other for the multi-modal emotion recognition task. Moreover, we compare our MMCert with a state-of-the-art certified defense extended from unimodal models. Our experimental results show that our MMCert outperforms the baseline.
4/3/2024
š
Improving Multimodal Learning with Multi-Loss Gradient Modulation
Konstantinos Kontras, Christos Chatzichristos, Matthew Blaschko, Maarten De Vos
0
0
Learning from multiple modalities, such as audio and video, offers opportunities for leveraging complementary information, enhancing robustness, and improving contextual understanding and performance. However, combining such modalities presents challenges, especially when modalities differ in data structure, predictive contribution, and the complexity of their learning processes. It has been observed that one modality can potentially dominate the learning process, hindering the effective utilization of information from other modalities and leading to sub-optimal model performance. To address this issue the vast majority of previous works suggest to assess the unimodal contributions and dynamically adjust the training to equalize them. We improve upon previous work by introducing a multi-loss objective and further refining the balancing process, allowing it to dynamically adjust the learning pace of each modality in both directions, acceleration and deceleration, with the ability to phase out balancing effects upon convergence. We achieve superior results across three audio-video datasets: on CREMA-D, models with ResNet backbone encoders surpass the previous best by 1.9% to 12.4%, and Conformer backbone models deliver improvements ranging from 2.8% to 14.1% across different fusion methods. On AVE, improvements range from 2.7% to 7.7%, while on UCF101, gains reach up to 6.1%.
5/14/2024
Robust Latent Representation Tuning for Image-text Classification
Hao Sun, Yu Song
0
0
Large models have demonstrated exceptional generalization capabilities in computer vision and natural language processing. Recent efforts have focused on enhancing these models with multimodal processing abilities. However, addressing the challenges posed by scenarios where one modality is absent remains a significant hurdle. In response to this issue, we propose a robust latent representation tuning method for large models. Specifically, our approach introduces a modality latent translation module to maximize the correlation between modalities, resulting in a robust representation. Following this, a newly designed fusion module is employed to facilitate information interaction between the modalities. Within this framework, common semantics are refined during training, and robust performance is achieved even in the absence of one modality. Importantly, our method maintains the frozen state of the image and text foundation models to preserve their capabilities acquired through large-scale pretraining. We conduct experiments on several public datasets, and the results underscore the effectiveness of our proposed method.
6/17/2024
Interventional Imbalanced Multi-Modal Representation Learning via $beta$-Generalization Front-Door Criterion
Yi Li, Jiangmeng Li, Fei Song, Qingmeng Zhu, Changwen Zheng, Wenwen Qiang
0
0
Multi-modal methods establish comprehensive superiority over uni-modal methods. However, the imbalanced contributions of different modalities to task-dependent predictions constantly degrade the discriminative performance of canonical multi-modal methods. Based on the contribution to task-dependent predictions, modalities can be identified as predominant and auxiliary modalities. Benchmark methods raise a tractable solution: augmenting the auxiliary modality with a minor contribution during training. However, our empirical explorations challenge the fundamental idea behind such behavior, and we further conclude that benchmark approaches suffer from certain defects: insufficient theoretical interpretability and limited exploration capability of discriminative knowledge. To this end, we revisit multi-modal representation learning from a causal perspective and build the Structural Causal Model. Following the empirical explorations, we determine to capture the true causality between the discriminative knowledge of predominant modality and predictive label while considering the auxiliary modality. Thus, we introduce the $beta$-generalization front-door criterion. Furthermore, we propose a novel network for sufficiently exploring multi-modal discriminative knowledge. Rigorous theoretical analyses and various empirical evaluations are provided to support the effectiveness of the innate mechanism behind our proposed method.
6/18/2024