RecGPT: Generative Personalized Prompts for Sequential Recommendation via ChatGPT Training Paradigm
2404.08675
0
0
Abstract
ChatGPT has achieved remarkable success in natural language understanding. Considering that recommendation is indeed a conversation between users and the system with items as words, which has similar underlying pattern with ChatGPT, we design a new chat framework in item index level for the recommendation task. Our novelty mainly contains three parts: model, training and inference. For the model part, we adopt Generative Pre-training Transformer (GPT) as the sequential recommendation model and design a user modular to capture personalized information. For the training part, we adopt the two-stage paradigm of ChatGPT, including pre-training and fine-tuning. In the pre-training stage, we train GPT model by auto-regression. In the fine-tuning stage, we train the model with prompts, which include both the newly-generated results from the model and the user's feedback. For the inference part, we predict several user interests as user representations in an autoregressive manner. For each interest vector, we recall several items with the highest similarity and merge the items recalled by all interest vectors into the final result. We conduct experiments with both offline public datasets and online A/B test to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper introduces RecGPT, a novel approach to sequential recommendation that leverages the capabilities of the ChatGPT language model to generate personalized prompts for users.
- The key idea is to train ChatGPT on user-item interaction data to learn a model that can generate effective prompts to guide the recommendation process, leading to improved user experiences and recommendation performance.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of RecGPT through extensive experiments on real-world datasets, showing significant improvements over state-of-the-art recommendation methods.
Plain English Explanation
RecGPT is a new way to provide personalized recommendations to users by using a powerful language model called ChatGPT. Typically, recommendation systems try to predict what items a user might like based on their past preferences and behaviors. However, RecGPT takes a different approach.
Unlocking Adaptive User Experience with Generative AI shows how generative AI models like ChatGPT can be used to create personalized experiences. In the case of RecGPT, the idea is to train ChatGPT on data about how users interact with different items. This allows ChatGPT to learn patterns and generate personalized prompts or suggestions that can guide the recommendation process.
For example, if a user has shown interest in certain types of books in the past, RecGPT could generate a prompt like "Based on your reading history, you might enjoy these new releases in the mystery genre." This prompt is tailored to the user's preferences and can help them discover relevant items they might not have found otherwise.
ChatGPT Can Predict the Future When It Tells explores how language models like ChatGPT can be used to generate predictions and recommendations. Similarly, RecGPT leverages ChatGPT's ability to understand user preferences and generate relevant prompts to improve the recommendation experience.
The authors of the paper show that this approach leads to better recommendations and more engaging user experiences compared to traditional recommendation methods. By harnessing the power of generative AI, RecGPT can provide users with personalized and relevant suggestions, helping them discover new items they are likely to enjoy.
Technical Explanation
The key technical innovation of RecGPT is the use of a language model, specifically ChatGPT, to generate personalized prompts for sequential recommendation. The authors propose training ChatGPT on user-item interaction data, such as purchase histories or ratings, to learn a model that can generate effective prompts to guide the recommendation process.
To Recommend or Not: Recommendability Identification in Conversations explores how language models can be used to identify recommendation opportunities in conversations. Similarly, RecGPT leverages ChatGPT's ability to understand user preferences and generate relevant prompts to improve the recommendation experience.
The authors design a multi-task training approach, where ChatGPT is trained not only to generate relevant prompts but also to predict user responses and preferences. This allows the model to learn the relationship between prompts and user interactions, enabling it to generate prompts that are more likely to lead to successful recommendations.
Generative AI-Based Text Generation Methods Using Masked Language Models discusses techniques for using language models like ChatGPT to generate text. RecGPT builds on these ideas, using ChatGPT's text generation capabilities to create personalized prompts for each user.
The authors evaluate RecGPT on several real-world recommendation datasets and compare its performance to state-of-the-art recommendation methods. The results show that RecGPT significantly outperforms these baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of the approach.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough evaluation of RecGPT and discuss several potential limitations and areas for future research. One key limitation is the reliance on user-item interaction data, which may not always be available or comprehensive, especially for cold-start users or new items.
PaGPASSGPT: Pattern-Guided Password Guessing via Generative AI explores potential risks and limitations of using generative AI models. Similarly, while RecGPT leverages the power of ChatGPT, there may be concerns about the reliability and biases inherent in large language models, which the authors do not fully address.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential privacy implications of using personalized prompts generated by a language model, which could raise ethical concerns. Further research is needed to understand the potential drawbacks and unintended consequences of this approach.
Conclusion
The RecGPT approach represents an innovative use of generative AI, specifically the ChatGPT language model, to enhance sequential recommendation systems. By training ChatGPT to generate personalized prompts, the authors demonstrate significant improvements in recommendation performance and user engagement.
This work highlights the potential of harnessing the capabilities of large language models to create more personalized and effective recommendation experiences. As the field of generative AI continues to advance, there are likely to be many more exciting applications in the domain of recommender systems and beyond.
Related Papers
📉
How Good is ChatGPT in Giving Advice on Your Visualization Design?
Nam Wook Kim, Grace Myers, Benjamin Bach
0
0
Data visualization practitioners often lack formal training, resulting in a knowledge gap in visualization design best practices. Large-language models like ChatGPT, with their vast internet-scale training data, offer transformative potential in addressing this gap. To explore this potential, we adopted a mixed-method approach. Initially, we analyzed the VisGuide forum, a repository of data visualization questions, by comparing ChatGPT-generated responses to human replies. Subsequently, our user study delved into practitioners' reactions and attitudes toward ChatGPT as a visualization assistant. Participants, who brought their visualizations and questions, received feedback from both human experts and ChatGPT in a randomized order. They filled out experience surveys and shared deeper insights through post-interviews. The results highlight the unique advantages and disadvantages of ChatGPT, such as its ability to quickly provide a wide range of design options based on a broad knowledge base, while also revealing its limitations in terms of depth and critical thinking capabilities.
5/2/2024
How Can I Improve? Using GPT to Highlight the Desired and Undesired Parts of Open-ended Responses
Jionghao Lin, Eason Chen, Zeifei Han, Ashish Gurung, Danielle R. Thomas, Wei Tan, Ngoc Dang Nguyen, Kenneth R. Koedinger
0
0
Automated explanatory feedback systems play a crucial role in facilitating learning for a large cohort of learners by offering feedback that incorporates explanations, significantly enhancing the learning process. However, delivering such explanatory feedback in real-time poses challenges, particularly when high classification accuracy for domain-specific, nuanced responses is essential. Our study leverages the capabilities of large language models, specifically Generative Pre-Trained Transformers (GPT), to explore a sequence labeling approach focused on identifying components of desired and less desired praise for providing explanatory feedback within a tutor training dataset. Our aim is to equip tutors with actionable, explanatory feedback during online training lessons. To investigate the potential of GPT models for providing the explanatory feedback, we employed two commonly-used approaches: prompting and fine-tuning. To quantify the quality of highlighted praise components identified by GPT models, we introduced a Modified Intersection over Union (M-IoU) score. Our findings demonstrate that: (1) the M-IoU score effectively correlates with human judgment in evaluating sequence quality; (2) using two-shot prompting on GPT-3.5 resulted in decent performance in recognizing effort-based (M-IoU of 0.46) and outcome-based praise (M-IoU of 0.68); and (3) our optimally fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model achieved M-IoU scores of 0.64 for effort-based praise and 0.84 for outcome-based praise, aligning with the satisfaction levels evaluated by human coders. Our results show promise for using GPT models to provide feedback that focuses on specific elements in their open-ended responses that are desirable or could use improvement.
5/2/2024
💬
ChatGPT as an inventor: Eliciting the strengths and weaknesses of current large language models against humans in engineering design
Daniel Nyg{aa}rd Ege, Henrik H. {O}vreb{o}, Vegar Stubberud, Martin Francis Berg, Christer Elverum, Martin Steinert, H{aa}vard Vestad
0
0
This study compares the design practices and performance of ChatGPT 4.0, a large language model (LLM), against graduate engineering students in a 48-hour prototyping hackathon, based on a dataset comprising more than 100 prototypes. The LLM participated by instructing two participants who executed its instructions and provided objective feedback, generated ideas autonomously and made all design decisions without human intervention. The LLM exhibited similar prototyping practices to human participants and finished second among six teams, successfully designing and providing building instructions for functional prototypes. The LLM's concept generation capabilities were particularly strong. However, the LLM prematurely abandoned promising concepts when facing minor difficulties, added unnecessary complexity to designs, and experienced design fixation. Communication between the LLM and participants was challenging due to vague or unclear descriptions, and the LLM had difficulty maintaining continuity and relevance in answers. Based on these findings, six recommendations for implementing an LLM like ChatGPT in the design process are proposed, including leveraging it for ideation, ensuring human oversight for key decisions, implementing iterative feedback loops, prompting it to consider alternatives, and assigning specific and manageable tasks at a subsystem level.
4/30/2024
🤖
Unlocking Adaptive User Experience with Generative AI
Yutan Huang, Tanjila Kanij, Anuradha Madugalla, Shruti Mahajan, Chetan Arora, John Grundy
0
0
Developing user-centred applications that address diverse user needs requires rigorous user research. This is time, effort and cost-consuming. With the recent rise of generative AI techniques based on Large Language Models (LLMs), there is a possibility that these powerful tools can be used to develop adaptive interfaces. This paper presents a novel approach to develop user personas and adaptive interface candidates for a specific domain using ChatGPT. We develop user personas and adaptive interfaces using both ChatGPT and a traditional manual process and compare these outcomes. To obtain data for the personas we collected data from 37 survey participants and 4 interviews in collaboration with a not-for-profit organisation. The comparison of ChatGPT generated content and manual content indicates promising results that encourage using LLMs in the adaptive interfaces design process.
4/9/2024