On Regression in Extreme Regions

2303.03084

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/11/2024 by Nathan Huet, Stephan Cl'emenc{c}on, Anne Sabourin

↗️

Abstract

The statistical learning problem consists in building a predictive function $hat{f}$ based on independent copies of $(X,Y)$ so that $Y$ is approximated by $hat{f}(X)$ with minimum (squared) error. Motivated by various applications, special attention is paid here to the case of extreme (i.e. very large) observations $X$. Because of their rarity, the contributions of such observations to the (empirical) error is negligible, and the predictive performance of empirical risk minimizers can be consequently very poor in extreme regions. In this paper, we develop a general framework for regression on extremes. Under appropriate regular variation assumptions regarding the pair $(X,Y)$, we show that an asymptotic notion of risk can be tailored to summarize appropriately predictive performance in extreme regions. It is also proved that minimization of an empirical and nonasymptotic version of this 'extreme risk', based on a fraction of the largest observations solely, yields good generalization capacity. In addition, numerical results providing strong empirical evidence of the relevance of the approach proposed are displayed.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper focuses on the problem of statistical learning, which involves building a predictive function based on observed data to approximate a target variable.
  • The authors pay special attention to the case where the input variables (X) have very large, or "extreme," observations.
  • They develop a framework for regression on these extreme values, which can be challenging for traditional methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a type of machine learning problem where the goal is to build a predictive function that can take some input information (X) and use it to estimate or "predict" a target variable (Y). This is a common task in many applications, like forecasting sales or predicting disease risk.

A key challenge arises when the input variables (X) sometimes have extremely large or "extreme" values. These rare, extreme observations can have a negligible impact on the overall error of the predictive model, but the model may still perform poorly at making accurate predictions for these extreme cases.

The authors propose a new framework to specifically address this challenge of making good predictions for extreme input values. By making some assumptions about the statistical properties of the data, they show that an alternative "extreme risk" metric can be used to train models that generalize well, even in the extreme regions of the input space. This could be useful in applications where accurate predictions for rare, extreme events are particularly important, like forecasting natural disasters or financial market crashes.

Technical Explanation

The paper tackles the statistical learning problem of building a predictive function $\hat{f}$ based on i.i.d. observations of $(X, Y)$ pairs, such that $Y$ is well approximated by $\hat{f}(X)$ in terms of (squared) error.

The authors focus specifically on cases where the input variable $X$ can take on extremely large values. Due to the rarity of these extreme observations, their contribution to the empirical error can be negligible, leading to poor predictive performance in the extreme regions.

To address this, the authors develop a general framework for regression on extremes. Under appropriate regular variation assumptions on the joint distribution of $(X, Y)$, they show that an "extreme risk" metric can be defined to better capture predictive performance in the tails. Minimizing an empirical and non-asymptotic version of this extreme risk, using only the largest observed $X$ values, is proven to yield good generalization.

The paper also presents numerical results that provide strong empirical evidence supporting the relevance of the proposed approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes an important contribution by addressing the challenge of making accurate predictions for rare, extreme observations, which can be a significant issue in many real-world applications. The proposed framework based on "extreme risk" minimization seems promising, though it relies on strong assumptions about the underlying data distribution.

One potential limitation is the requirement of regular variation assumptions, which may not hold in all practical scenarios. It would be interesting to see how the method performs when these assumptions are violated or relaxed.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the regression setting, but it would be valuable to explore how the ideas could be extended to other learning problems, such as classification or anomaly detection.

Overall, the research presented in this paper offers a novel and principled approach to a important problem in machine learning and statistics, and it deserves further investigation and validation on a wider range of real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new framework for addressing the challenge of making accurate predictions for rare, extreme observations in the context of statistical learning problems. By defining an "extreme risk" metric and minimizing an empirical version of it, the authors show how to train models that generalize well, even in the tails of the input distribution.

The proposed approach has the potential to be impactful in applications where accurate predictions for extreme events are crucial, such as forecasting natural disasters or financial market crashes. While the method relies on some strong assumptions, the paper provides a solid theoretical foundation and promising empirical results, suggesting that this line of research is worth further exploration.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🔮

Prediction Risk and Estimation Risk of the Ridgeless Least Squares Estimator under General Assumptions on Regression Errors

Sungyoon Lee, Sokbae Lee

YC

0

Reddit

0

In recent years, there has been a significant growth in research focusing on minimum $ell_2$ norm (ridgeless) interpolation least squares estimators. However, the majority of these analyses have been limited to an unrealistic regression error structure, assuming independent and identically distributed errors with zero mean and common variance. In this paper, we explore prediction risk as well as estimation risk under more general regression error assumptions, highlighting the benefits of overparameterization in a more realistic setting that allows for clustered or serial dependence. Notably, we establish that the estimation difficulties associated with the variance components of both risks can be summarized through the trace of the variance-covariance matrix of the regression errors. Our findings suggest that the benefits of overparameterization can extend to time series, panel and grouped data.

Read more

6/14/2024

High-dimensional robust regression under heavy-tailed data: Asymptotics and Universality

High-dimensional robust regression under heavy-tailed data: Asymptotics and Universality

Urte Adomaityte, Leonardo Defilippis, Bruno Loureiro, Gabriele Sicuro

YC

0

Reddit

0

We investigate the high-dimensional properties of robust regression estimators in the presence of heavy-tailed contamination of both the covariates and response functions. In particular, we provide a sharp asymptotic characterisation of M-estimators trained on a family of elliptical covariate and noise data distributions including cases where second and higher moments do not exist. We show that, despite being consistent, the Huber loss with optimally tuned location parameter $delta$ is suboptimal in the high-dimensional regime in the presence of heavy-tailed noise, highlighting the necessity of further regularisation to achieve optimal performance. This result also uncovers the existence of a transition in $delta$ as a function of the sample complexity and contamination. Moreover, we derive the decay rates for the excess risk of ridge regression. We show that, while it is both optimal and universal for covariate distributions with finite second moment, its decay rate can be considerably faster when the covariates' second moment does not exist. Finally, we show that our formulas readily generalise to a richer family of models and data distributions, such as generalised linear estimation with arbitrary convex regularisation trained on mixture models.

Read more

6/3/2024

🤿

Robust deep learning from weakly dependent data

William Kengne, Modou Wade

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent developments on deep learning established some theoretical properties of deep neural networks estimators. However, most of the existing works on this topic are restricted to bounded loss functions or (sub)-Gaussian or bounded input. This paper considers robust deep learning from weakly dependent observations, with unbounded loss function and unbounded input/output. It is only assumed that the output variable has a finite $r$ order moment, with $r >1$. Non asymptotic bounds for the expected excess risk of the deep neural network estimator are established under strong mixing, and $psi$-weak dependence assumptions on the observations. We derive a relationship between these bounds and $r$, and when the data have moments of any order (that is $r=infty$), the convergence rate is close to some well-known results. When the target predictor belongs to the class of Holder smooth functions with sufficiently large smoothness index, the rate of the expected excess risk for exponentially strongly mixing data is close to or as same as those for obtained with i.i.d. samples. Application to robust nonparametric regression and robust nonparametric autoregression are considered. The simulation study for models with heavy-tailed errors shows that, robust estimators with absolute loss and Huber loss function outperform the least squares method.

Read more

5/9/2024

Beyond the Norms: Detecting Prediction Errors in Regression Models

Beyond the Norms: Detecting Prediction Errors in Regression Models

Andres Altieri, Marco Romanelli, Georg Pichler, Florence Alberge, Pablo Piantanida

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper tackles the challenge of detecting unreliable behavior in regression algorithms, which may arise from intrinsic variability (e.g., aleatoric uncertainty) or modeling errors (e.g., model uncertainty). First, we formally introduce the notion of unreliability in regression, i.e., when the output of the regressor exceeds a specified discrepancy (or error). Then, using powerful tools for probabilistic modeling, we estimate the discrepancy density, and we measure its statistical diversity using our proposed metric for statistical dissimilarity. In turn, this allows us to derive a data-driven score that expresses the uncertainty of the regression outcome. We show empirical improvements in error detection for multiple regression tasks, consistently outperforming popular baseline approaches, and contributing to the broader field of uncertainty quantification and safe machine learning systems. Our code is available at https://zenodo.org/records/11281964.

Read more

6/12/2024