Regret Bounds for Episodic Risk-Sensitive Linear Quadratic Regulator
2406.05366
0
0
🤷
Abstract
Risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator is one of the most fundamental problems in risk-sensitive optimal control. In this paper, we study online adaptive control of risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator in the finite horizon episodic setting. We propose a simple least-squares greedy algorithm and show that it achieves $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(log N)$ regret under a specific identifiability assumption, where $N$ is the total number of episodes. If the identifiability assumption is not satisfied, we propose incorporating exploration noise into the least-squares-based algorithm, resulting in an algorithm with $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{N})$ regret. To our best knowledge, this is the first set of regret bounds for episodic risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator. Our proof relies on perturbation analysis of less-standard Riccati equations for risk-sensitive linear quadratic control, and a delicate analysis of the loss in the risk-sensitive performance criterion due to applying the suboptimal controller in the online learning process.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores online adaptive control of the risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator (RS-LQR) problem in a finite horizon episodic setting.
- The authors propose a simple least-squares greedy algorithm and analyze its regret performance under different assumptions.
- They also incorporate exploration noise into the algorithm to achieve better regret bounds when the identifiability assumption is not satisfied.
- To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first set of regret bounds for the episodic risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator problem.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles a fundamental problem in risk-sensitive optimal control, known as the risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator (RS-LQR). This problem involves finding the best way to control a linear system while taking into account the risk or uncertainty associated with the outcomes.
The authors focus on the online adaptive control setting, where the system dynamics are not known in advance, and the controller must learn and adapt over time. Specifically, they consider a finite horizon episodic setting, where the system is controlled over a series of episodes, and the goal is to minimize the cumulative risk-sensitive performance loss over all episodes.
The authors propose a simple least-squares greedy algorithm, which they show can achieve a logarithmic regret bound under a specific identifiability assumption. This means that as the number of episodes increases, the algorithm's performance approaches the optimal risk-sensitive controller's performance at a logarithmic rate.
However, if the identifiability assumption is not satisfied, the authors incorporate exploration noise into the least-squares-based algorithm. This modified algorithm can achieve a square root regret bound, which is a weaker guarantee but still better than a linear regret bound.
The authors' analysis relies on a careful study of the properties of the Riccati equations, which are a fundamental tool in linear quadratic control. They also need to analyze how the risk-sensitive performance criterion changes when the suboptimal controller is applied during the online learning process.
Technical Explanation
The authors consider the risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator (RS-LQR) problem in an episodic setting, where the system dynamics are unknown and must be learned over a sequence of episodes. In each episode, the controller aims to minimize the risk-sensitive performance criterion, which takes into account both the expected cost and the uncertainty or variability of the cost.
The authors propose a simple least-squares greedy algorithm, which uses the observed system trajectories from previous episodes to estimate the system dynamics and compute the optimal risk-sensitive controller for the current episode. Under a specific identifiability assumption, the authors show that this algorithm can achieve a regret bound of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\log N)$, where $N$ is the total number of episodes.
If the identifiability assumption is not satisfied, the authors incorporate exploration noise into the least-squares-based algorithm. This modified algorithm can achieve a regret bound of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{N})$, which is a weaker guarantee but still better than a linear regret bound.
The authors' analysis relies on a perturbation analysis of the Riccati equations for risk-sensitive linear quadratic control, which are less standard than the classical linear quadratic regulator (LQR) case. They also need to carefully analyze the loss in the risk-sensitive performance criterion due to applying the suboptimal controller during the online learning process.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of the online adaptive control of the risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator problem, which is a challenging and important problem in the field of optimal control and reinforcement learning.
One potential limitation of the work is the reliance on the specific identifiability assumption, which may not always be satisfied in practice. While the authors address this by proposing an algorithm that can achieve a weaker regret bound without the identifiability assumption, it would be interesting to explore other approaches that can handle a wider range of scenarios.
Additionally, the authors focus on the finite horizon episodic setting, which may not capture all the real-world dynamics and constraints that can arise in practical applications. Extending the analysis to the infinite horizon case or considering other problem formulations could be valuable directions for future research.
The authors' proof techniques, involving the perturbation analysis of Riccati equations and the delicate analysis of the risk-sensitive performance criterion, demonstrate a high level of technical sophistication. However, the complexity of these analyses may limit the accessibility of the results to a broader audience. Developing more intuitive explanations or highlighting the key insights could help make the work more widely applicable.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the field of risk-sensitive optimal control by providing the first set of regret bounds for the episodic risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator problem. The authors' proposed algorithms and analysis offer valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities in this domain, laying the groundwork for further developments in adaptive control and online learning for risk-sensitive systems.
The results presented in this paper have the potential to impact various applications where risk-sensitive decision-making is crucial, such as finance, energy systems, and robotics. As the field of risk-sensitive reinforcement learning continues to evolve, this work will likely serve as a reference for researchers and practitioners seeking to design efficient and robust control strategies in the face of uncertainty.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔍
Fully Adaptive Regret-Guaranteed Algorithm for Control of Linear Quadratic Systems
Jafar Abbaszadeh Chekan, Cedric Langbort
0
0
The first algorithm for the Linear Quadratic (LQ) control problem with an unknown system model, featuring a regret of $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T})$, was introduced by Abbasi-Yadkori and Szepesv'ari (2011). Recognizing the computational complexity of this algorithm, subsequent efforts (see Cohen et al. (2019), Mania et al. (2019), Faradonbeh et al. (2020a), and Kargin et al.(2022)) have been dedicated to proposing algorithms that are computationally tractable while preserving this order of regret. Although successful, the existing works in the literature lack a fully adaptive exploration-exploitation trade-off adjustment and require a user-defined value, which can lead to overall regret bound growth with some factors. In this work, noticing this gap, we propose the first fully adaptive algorithm that controls the number of policy updates (i.e., tunes the exploration-exploitation trade-off) and optimizes the upper-bound of regret adaptively. Our proposed algorithm builds on the SDP-based approach of Cohen et al. (2019) and relaxes its need for a horizon-dependant warm-up phase by appropriately tuning the regularization parameter and adding an adaptive input perturbation. We further show that through careful exploration-exploitation trade-off adjustment there is no need to commit to the widely-used notion of strong sequential stability, which is restrictive and can introduce complexities in initialization.
6/13/2024
↗️
Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systems
Ingvar Ziemann, Henrik Sandberg
0
0
TWe establish regret lower bounds for adaptively controlling an unknown linear Gaussian system with quadratic costs. We combine ideas from experiment design, estimation theory and a perturbation bound of certain information matrices to derive regret lower bounds exhibiting scaling on the order of magnitude $sqrt{T}$ in the time horizon $T$. Our bounds accurately capture the role of control-theoretic parameters and we are able to show that systems that are hard to control are also hard to learn to control; when instantiated to state feedback systems we recover the dimensional dependency of earlier work but with improved scaling with system-theoretic constants such as system costs and Gramians. Furthermore, we extend our results to a class of partially observed systems and demonstrate that systems with poor observability structure also are hard to learn to control.
6/13/2024
🤷
Learning Decentralized Linear Quadratic Regulator with $sqrt{T}$ Regret
Lintao Ye, Ming Chi, Ruiquan Liao, Vijay Gupta
0
0
We propose an online learning algorithm that adaptively designs a decentralized linear quadratic regulator when the system model is unknown a priori and new data samples from a single system trajectory become progressively available. The algorithm uses a disturbance-feedback representation of state-feedback controllers coupled with online convex optimization with memory and delayed feedback. Under the assumption that the system is stable or given a known stabilizing controller, we show that our controller enjoys an expected regret that scales as $sqrt{T}$ with the time horizon $T$ for the case of partially nested information pattern. For more general information patterns, the optimal controller is unknown even if the system model is known. In this case, the regret of our controller is shown with respect to a linear sub-optimal controller. We validate our theoretical findings using numerical experiments.
4/16/2024
Continuous-time Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning via Quadratic Variation Penalty
Yanwei Jia
0
0
This paper studies continuous-time risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RL) under the entropy-regularized, exploratory diffusion process formulation with the exponential-form objective. The risk-sensitive objective arises either as the agent's risk attitude or as a distributionally robust approach against the model uncertainty. Owing to the martingale perspective in Jia and Zhou (2023) the risk-sensitive RL problem is shown to be equivalent to ensuring the martingale property of a process involving both the value function and the q-function, augmented by an additional penalty term: the quadratic variation of the value process, capturing the variability of the value-to-go along the trajectory. This characterization allows for the straightforward adaptation of existing RL algorithms developed for non-risk-sensitive scenarios to incorporate risk sensitivity by adding the realized variance of the value process. Additionally, I highlight that the conventional policy gradient representation is inadequate for risk-sensitive problems due to the nonlinear nature of quadratic variation; however, q-learning offers a solution and extends to infinite horizon settings. Finally, I prove the convergence of the proposed algorithm for Merton's investment problem and quantify the impact of temperature parameter on the behavior of the learning procedure. I also conduct simulation experiments to demonstrate how risk-sensitive RL improves the finite-sample performance in the linear-quadratic control problem.
4/22/2024