Learning Decentralized Linear Quadratic Regulator with $sqrt{T}$ Regret
2210.08886
0
0
🤷
Abstract
We propose an online learning algorithm that adaptively designs a decentralized linear quadratic regulator when the system model is unknown a priori and new data samples from a single system trajectory become progressively available. The algorithm uses a disturbance-feedback representation of state-feedback controllers coupled with online convex optimization with memory and delayed feedback. Under the assumption that the system is stable or given a known stabilizing controller, we show that our controller enjoys an expected regret that scales as $sqrt{T}$ with the time horizon $T$ for the case of partially nested information pattern. For more general information patterns, the optimal controller is unknown even if the system model is known. In this case, the regret of our controller is shown with respect to a linear sub-optimal controller. We validate our theoretical findings using numerical experiments.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes an online learning algorithm that can adaptively design a decentralized linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller when the system model is unknown.
- The algorithm uses a disturbance-feedback representation of state-feedback controllers and online convex optimization with memory and delayed feedback.
- The paper analyzes the algorithm's performance and shows that it can achieve an expected regret that scales as the square root of the time horizon under certain assumptions.
- For more general information patterns, the regret is shown with respect to a linear sub-optimal controller.
- The paper validates the theoretical findings through numerical experiments.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new algorithm that can automatically design a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller for a system, even when the details of the system are not known ahead of time. The LQR is a type of controller that is commonly used to keep a system stable and performing well.
Typically, designing an LQR controller requires knowing the exact mathematical model of the system. However, in many real-world situations, the system model may be unknown or changing over time. This new algorithm can adapt the LQR controller as new information about the system becomes available, without needing the full model upfront.
The key ideas behind the algorithm are:
- Using a special way to represent the controller that incorporates feedback from disturbances in the system.
- Updating the controller parameters over time using an online convex optimization technique that can handle delayed information.
The researchers show that this algorithm can achieve a regret (a measure of how much the controller's performance deviates from the optimal) that grows at a reasonable rate as the system is operated for longer. They also demonstrate the algorithm's effectiveness through computer simulations.
Overall, this work presents a promising approach for automatically designing high-performing controllers in situations where the system details are not fully known ahead of time, which is common in many real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The key elements of the paper are:
-
Adaptive LQR Controller Design: The researchers propose an online learning algorithm that can adaptively design a decentralized linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller. This is done when the system model is unknown a priori, and new data samples from a single system trajectory become progressively available.
-
Disturbance-Feedback Representation: The algorithm uses a disturbance-feedback representation of state-feedback controllers, coupled with online convex optimization with memory and delayed feedback.
-
Regret Analysis: Under the assumption that the system is stable or given a known stabilizing controller, the paper shows that the controller enjoys an expected regret that scales as the square root of the time horizon T for the case of partially nested information pattern. For more general information patterns, the regret is shown with respect to a linear sub-optimal controller.
-
Numerical Validation: The theoretical findings are validated using numerical experiments, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
The key technical insights are the use of the disturbance-feedback representation and the online convex optimization approach, which allow the algorithm to adaptively design the LQR controller without requiring full knowledge of the system model upfront. The regret analysis provides theoretical guarantees on the controller's performance compared to the optimal, which is a valuable contribution.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes several important assumptions that could limit the algorithm's real-world applicability in some cases:
-
Stable or Known Stabilizing Controller: The regret analysis assumes that the system is either inherently stable or that a known stabilizing controller is available. In practice, this may not always be the case, and the algorithm's performance in unstable systems is not addressed.
-
Single Trajectory Data: The algorithm relies on data from a single system trajectory, which may not be available in all scenarios. Extending the approach to handle multiple, potentially heterogeneous, system trajectories could broaden its applicability.
-
Partially Nested Information Pattern: For the optimal regret bound, the paper assumes a partially nested information pattern, which may not hold in all situations. Analyzing the algorithm's performance under more general information structures would be valuable.
-
Linear Sub-Optimal Controller Comparison: When the optimal controller is unknown, the regret is bounded with respect to a linear sub-optimal controller. Comparing the performance to the true optimal controller, if it were known, would provide a stronger evaluation.
Despite these limitations, the paper presents a novel and promising approach for adaptively designing LQR controllers in the face of unknown system dynamics. Further research addressing the identified caveats could lead to even more robust and widely applicable algorithms.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an online learning algorithm that can adaptively design a decentralized linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller when the system model is unknown. The key innovations are the use of a disturbance-feedback representation and online convex optimization, which allow the algorithm to update the controller parameters as new data becomes available.
The theoretical analysis shows that the algorithm can achieve an expected regret that scales as the square root of the time horizon under certain assumptions, and the numerical experiments validate the effectiveness of the approach. While the algorithm has some limitations, such as the need for a stable or known stabilizing controller, it represents a promising step towards more flexible and adaptive control systems that can operate in complex, real-world environments with limited a priori knowledge.
The potential implications of this research include more robust and efficient control systems for a wide range of applications, from industrial automation to autonomous vehicles and beyond. As the field of adaptive control continues to evolve, contributions like this one will be crucial in enabling the development of intelligent, self-tuning systems that can adapt to changing conditions and deliver optimal performance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
↗️
Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systems
Ingvar Ziemann, Henrik Sandberg
0
0
TWe establish regret lower bounds for adaptively controlling an unknown linear Gaussian system with quadratic costs. We combine ideas from experiment design, estimation theory and a perturbation bound of certain information matrices to derive regret lower bounds exhibiting scaling on the order of magnitude $sqrt{T}$ in the time horizon $T$. Our bounds accurately capture the role of control-theoretic parameters and we are able to show that systems that are hard to control are also hard to learn to control; when instantiated to state feedback systems we recover the dimensional dependency of earlier work but with improved scaling with system-theoretic constants such as system costs and Gramians. Furthermore, we extend our results to a class of partially observed systems and demonstrate that systems with poor observability structure also are hard to learn to control.
6/13/2024
🔍
Fully Adaptive Regret-Guaranteed Algorithm for Control of Linear Quadratic Systems
Jafar Abbaszadeh Chekan, Cedric Langbort
0
0
The first algorithm for the Linear Quadratic (LQ) control problem with an unknown system model, featuring a regret of $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T})$, was introduced by Abbasi-Yadkori and Szepesv'ari (2011). Recognizing the computational complexity of this algorithm, subsequent efforts (see Cohen et al. (2019), Mania et al. (2019), Faradonbeh et al. (2020a), and Kargin et al.(2022)) have been dedicated to proposing algorithms that are computationally tractable while preserving this order of regret. Although successful, the existing works in the literature lack a fully adaptive exploration-exploitation trade-off adjustment and require a user-defined value, which can lead to overall regret bound growth with some factors. In this work, noticing this gap, we propose the first fully adaptive algorithm that controls the number of policy updates (i.e., tunes the exploration-exploitation trade-off) and optimizes the upper-bound of regret adaptively. Our proposed algorithm builds on the SDP-based approach of Cohen et al. (2019) and relaxes its need for a horizon-dependant warm-up phase by appropriately tuning the regularization parameter and adding an adaptive input perturbation. We further show that through careful exploration-exploitation trade-off adjustment there is no need to commit to the widely-used notion of strong sequential stability, which is restrictive and can introduce complexities in initialization.
6/13/2024
🌀
Approximate Thompson Sampling for Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators with $O(sqrt{T})$ Regret
Yeoneung Kim, Gihun Kim, Insoon Yang
0
0
We propose an approximate Thompson sampling algorithm that learns linear quadratic regulators (LQR) with an improved Bayesian regret bound of $O(sqrt{T})$. Our method leverages Langevin dynamics with a meticulously designed preconditioner as well as a simple excitation mechanism. We show that the excitation signal induces the minimum eigenvalue of the preconditioner to grow over time, thereby accelerating the approximate posterior sampling process. Moreover, we identify nontrivial concentration properties of the approximate posteriors generated by our algorithm. These properties enable us to bound the moments of the system state and attain an $O(sqrt{T})$ regret bound without the unrealistic restrictive assumptions on parameter sets that are often used in the literature.
5/31/2024
🤷
Regret Bounds for Episodic Risk-Sensitive Linear Quadratic Regulator
Wenhao Xu, Xuefeng Gao, Xuedong He
0
0
Risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator is one of the most fundamental problems in risk-sensitive optimal control. In this paper, we study online adaptive control of risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator in the finite horizon episodic setting. We propose a simple least-squares greedy algorithm and show that it achieves $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(log N)$ regret under a specific identifiability assumption, where $N$ is the total number of episodes. If the identifiability assumption is not satisfied, we propose incorporating exploration noise into the least-squares-based algorithm, resulting in an algorithm with $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{N})$ regret. To our best knowledge, this is the first set of regret bounds for episodic risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator. Our proof relies on perturbation analysis of less-standard Riccati equations for risk-sensitive linear quadratic control, and a delicate analysis of the loss in the risk-sensitive performance criterion due to applying the suboptimal controller in the online learning process.
6/11/2024