Settling Constant Regrets in Linear Markov Decision Processes

Overview

• The paper studies how to design reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms that achieve constant regret over an infinite number of episodes with high probability.
• The authors introduce an algorithm called Cert-LSVI-UCB that can handle linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) with misspecified transition kernels and reward functions.
• The key innovation is a certified estimator that allows for a fine-grained analysis of multi-phase value-targeted regression, leading to a constant, instance-dependent regret bound.
• This is the first RL algorithm with linear function approximation to achieve such a guarantee without relying on prior distribution assumptions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a fundamental challenge in reinforcement learning (RL): how to design algorithms that can consistently perform well, even after an extremely large number of trials or "episodes". Typically, the performance of RL algorithms is measured by "regret", which is the difference between the rewards obtained by the algorithm and the maximum possible rewards. The goal is to minimize this regret.

The authors introduce a new RL algorithm called Cert-LSVI-UCB that can handle situations where the underlying model (called a Markov decision process or MDP) is not perfectly specified. In these cases, the transition probabilities and reward function can only be approximated using linear functions, with some level of error or "misspecification".

The key innovation in Cert-LSVI-UCB is a certified estimator, which allows the algorithm to carefully track and account for this misspecification error. This enables a very precise analysis of the algorithm's performance, leading to a constant regret bound. In other words, the regret does not grow with the number of episodes, even if you run the algorithm indefinitely.

This is a significant advance, as previous RL algorithms with linear function approximation could only achieve regret bounds that grew with the number of episodes. The authors' approach also does not require making assumptions about the prior distribution of the MDP, unlike some other recent RL methods.

Technical Explanation

The core of the Cert-LSVI-UCB algorithm is an innovative certified estimator that facilitates a fine-grained concentration analysis for multi-phase value-targeted regression. This allows the algorithm to establish an instance-dependent regret bound that is constant with respect to the number of episodes.

Specifically, the authors consider a linear MDP setting, where both the transition kernel and the reward function can be approximated by linear functions up to some misspecification level $\zeta$. They show that for an MDP characterized by a minimal suboptimality gap $\Delta$, Cert-LSVI-UCB has a cumulative regret of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d^3H^5/\Delta)$ with high probability, provided that the misspecification level $\zeta$ is below $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\Delta / (\sqrt{d}H^2))$.

Importantly, this regret bound remains constant relative to the number of episodes $K$. To the best of the authors' knowledge, Cert-LSVI-UCB is the first algorithm to achieve a constant, instance-dependent, high-probability regret bound in RL with linear function approximation for infinite runs without relying on prior distribution assumptions.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that the misspecification level $\zeta$ required for their guarantees to hold may be difficult to estimate in practice. Additionally, the dependence of the regret bound on the suboptimality gap $\Delta$ suggests that the algorithm may struggle in MDPs with small gaps, which can be common in real-world applications.

While the authors' techniques for the certified estimator and multi-phase value-targeted regression are technically innovative, the practical implementation and tuning of the algorithm may pose challenges. It would be valuable to see how Cert-LSVI-UCB performs in more realistic, large-scale experiments, beyond the synthetic benchmarks presented in the paper.

Furthermore, the theoretical analysis relies on several assumptions, such as the linear structure of the MDP and the availability of accurate feature representations. It would be interesting to see if the authors' approach can be extended to more general function approximation settings, such as those explored in other recent RL research.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel RL algorithm, Cert-LSVI-UCB, that can achieve constant regret bounds over an infinite number of episodes in misspecified linear MDPs. This is a significant advance, as previous RL methods with linear function approximation could only guarantee regret bounds that grew with the number of episodes.

The authors' certified estimator and multi-phase value-targeted regression techniques represent important algorithmic contributions that could inspire further research in this area. While the practical implementation may pose challenges, the paper's theoretical guarantees highlight the potential for RL algorithms to achieve robust and consistent performance, even in complex and uncertain environments.

As the field of RL continues to evolve, the insights and techniques presented in this work may inform the development of even more capable and reliable RL systems that can be deployed in high-stakes applications, with strong theoretical assurances.