Relational DNN Verification With Cross Executional Bound Refinement
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a new method for verifying the safety of deep neural networks (DNNs) using relational properties
- Introduces a novel "cross-executional bound refinement" technique to improve the verification process
- Demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach on several benchmark DNN verification tasks
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the important problem of verifying the safety and reliability of deep neural networks (DNNs). DNNs are powerful machine learning models that are increasingly being used in high-stakes applications like autonomous driving and medical diagnosis. However, ensuring that these models behave safely and reliably is a significant challenge.
The researchers propose a new method for verifying DNN safety using "relational properties." Relational properties describe the relationship between the inputs and outputs of a DNN, rather than just looking at the outputs alone. For example, a relational property might state that if the input image is slightly modified, the output classification should not change.
The key innovation in this paper is a technique called "cross-executional bound refinement." This helps to improve the verification process by iteratively refining the bounds on the DNN's behavior, using information from multiple executions of the DNN. Link to Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Safety Verification
The researchers demonstrate that their approach outperforms existing DNN verification methods on several benchmark tasks. This suggests that their relational verification technique with cross-executional bound refinement could be a valuable tool for ensuring the safety and reliability of critical DNN-based systems. Link to Formal Verification of Graph Convolutional Networks under Uncertain Node Attributes
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new method for verifying the safety of deep neural networks (DNNs) using relational properties. Relational properties describe the relationship between the inputs and outputs of a DNN, rather than just looking at the outputs alone. For example, a relational property might state that if the input image is slightly modified, the output classification should not change.
The key innovation in this work is a technique called "cross-executional bound refinement." This helps to improve the verification process by iteratively refining the bounds on the DNN's behavior, using information from multiple executions of the DNN. Link to Hybrid Convolutional Neural Networks with Reliability Guarantee
The researchers first encode the DNN and the relational properties as a system of constraints. They then use an SMT (Satisfiability Modulo Theories) solver to find the tightest possible bounds on the DNN's behavior that satisfy these constraints. However, these initial bounds may not be tight enough to prove the desired relational properties.
To address this, the researchers introduce the cross-executional bound refinement technique. This involves running the DNN on a set of input-output pairs, and using the observed behavior to further refine the bounds. The refined bounds are then used in the SMT solver to try to prove the relational properties. This process is repeated until the properties are either proven or disproven.
The researchers evaluate their approach on several benchmark DNN verification tasks, including image classification and autonomous driving scenarios. They show that their method outperforms existing DNN verification approaches in terms of both verification accuracy and runtime. Link to AdvRepair: Provable Repair of Adversarial Attacks
Critical Analysis
The proposed approach for verifying the safety of deep neural networks using relational properties is a promising direction, but there are some potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Scalability: The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach on relatively small-scale DNN models. It's unclear how well the method would scale to larger, more complex networks that are commonly used in real-world applications. Link to Set-Based Training for Neural Network Verification
-
Generalization: The paper focuses on a specific set of relational properties, such as robustness to small input perturbations. It's unclear how well the approach would generalize to a broader range of relational properties that may be relevant in different application domains.
-
Computational Overhead: The cross-executional bound refinement technique involves repeatedly running the DNN on input-output pairs, which could be computationally expensive, especially for large models. The paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational cost of the approach.
-
Dependence on SMT Solvers: The approach relies heavily on SMT solvers to find the tightest possible bounds on the DNN's behavior. The effectiveness of the approach may be limited by the capabilities of the underlying SMT solver, and it's unclear how well the method would perform with different solvers or solver configurations.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and promising approach for verifying the safety of deep neural networks using relational properties. However, further research is needed to address the potential limitations and to explore the broader applicability of the method.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new method for verifying the safety of deep neural networks (DNNs) using relational properties. The key innovation is a technique called "cross-executional bound refinement," which helps to improve the verification process by iteratively refining the bounds on the DNN's behavior using information from multiple executions.
The researchers demonstrate that their approach outperforms existing DNN verification methods on several benchmark tasks, suggesting that it could be a valuable tool for ensuring the safety and reliability of critical DNN-based systems. However, there are some potential limitations, such as scalability, generalization, and computational overhead, that warrant further investigation.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the field of DNN safety verification, and the ideas presented in the paper could have significant implications for the development of robust and trustworthy AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Relational DNN Verification With Cross Executional Bound Refinement
Debangshu Banerjee, Gagandeep Singh
We focus on verifying relational properties defined over deep neural networks (DNNs) such as robustness against universal adversarial perturbations (UAP), certified worst-case hamming distance for binary string classifications, etc. Precise verification of these properties requires reasoning about multiple executions of the same DNN. However, most of the existing works in DNN verification only handle properties defined over single executions and as a result, are imprecise for relational properties. Though few recent works for relational DNN verification, capture linear dependencies between the inputs of multiple executions, they do not leverage dependencies between the outputs of hidden layers producing imprecise results. We develop a scalable relational verifier RACoon that utilizes cross-execution dependencies at all layers of the DNN gaining substantial precision over SOTA baselines on a wide range of datasets, networks, and relational properties.
Read more5/17/2024
0
VNN: Verification-Friendly Neural Networks with Hard Robustness Guarantees
Anahita Baninajjar, Ahmed Rezine, Amir Aminifar
Machine learning techniques often lack formal correctness guarantees, evidenced by the widespread adversarial examples that plague most deep-learning applications. This lack of formal guarantees resulted in several research efforts that aim at verifying Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), with a particular focus on safety-critical applications. However, formal verification techniques still face major scalability and precision challenges. The over-approximation introduced during the formal verification process to tackle the scalability challenge often results in inconclusive analysis. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework to generate Verification-Friendly Neural Networks (VNNs). We present a post-training optimization framework to achieve a balance between preserving prediction performance and verification-friendliness. Our proposed framework results in VNNs that are comparable to the original DNNs in terms of prediction performance, while amenable to formal verification techniques. This essentially enables us to establish robustness for more VNNs than their DNN counterparts, in a time-efficient manner.
Read more6/11/2024
✅
0
Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Safety Verification of DNN-Controlled Systems
Dapeng Zhi, Peixin Wang, Si Liu, Luke Ong, Min Zhang
The rapid advance of deep reinforcement learning techniques enables the oversight of safety-critical systems through the utilization of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). This underscores the pressing need to promptly establish certified safety guarantees for such DNN-controlled systems. Most of the existing verification approaches rely on qualitative approaches, predominantly employing reachability analysis. However, qualitative verification proves inadequate for DNN-controlled systems as their behaviors exhibit stochastic tendencies when operating in open and adversarial environments. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for unifying both qualitative and quantitative safety verification problems of DNN-controlled systems. This is achieved by formulating the verification tasks as the synthesis of valid neural barrier certificates (NBCs). Initially, the framework seeks to establish almost-sure safety guarantees through qualitative verification. In cases where qualitative verification fails, our quantitative verification method is invoked, yielding precise lower and upper bounds on probabilistic safety across both infinite and finite time horizons. To facilitate the synthesis of NBCs, we introduce their $k$-inductive variants. We also devise a simulation-guided approach for training NBCs, aiming to achieve tightness in computing precise certified lower and upper bounds. We prototype our approach into a tool called $textsf{UniQQ}$ and showcase its efficacy on four classic DNN-controlled systems.
Read more4/3/2024
🤿
0
Verifying the Generalization of Deep Learning to Out-of-Distribution Domains
Guy Amir, Osher Maayan, Tom Zelazny, Guy Katz, Michael Schapira
Deep neural networks (DNNs) play a crucial role in the field of machine learning, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance across various application domains. However, despite their success, DNN-based models may occasionally exhibit challenges with generalization, i.e., may fail to handle inputs that were not encountered during training. This limitation is a significant challenge when it comes to deploying deep learning for safety-critical tasks, as well as in real-world settings characterized by substantial variability. We introduce a novel approach for harnessing DNN verification technology to identify DNN-driven decision rules that exhibit robust generalization to previously unencountered input domains. Our method assesses generalization within an input domain by measuring the level of agreement between independently trained deep neural networks for inputs in this domain. We also efficiently realize our approach by using off-the-shelf DNN verification engines, and extensively evaluate it on both supervised and unsupervised DNN benchmarks, including a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) system for Internet congestion control -- demonstrating the applicability of our approach for real-world settings. Moreover, our research introduces a fresh objective for formal verification, offering the prospect of mitigating the challenges linked to deploying DNN-driven systems in real-world scenarios.
Read more7/2/2024