Hybrid Convolutional Neural Networks with Reliability Guarantee

Read original: arXiv:2405.05146 - Published 5/10/2024 by Hans Dermot Doran, Suzana Veljanovska
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Ensuring the safety and reliability of AI systems is a critical challenge
  • The proposed approach uses redundant execution to improve the dependability of AI models
  • This technique can extend the applicability of AI accelerators without documented safety features
  • Typical redundancy techniques incur significant computational overhead
  • The authors take a co-design approach to minimize the additional cost

Plain English Explanation

Building AI models that are safe and reliable is a major challenge. One way to help address this is through redundant execution - running the same AI model multiple times and comparing the results to ensure they are consistent. This can help catch errors or inconsistencies that might arise during the model's operation.

The authors propose using this redundant execution technique to make AI systems more dependable, even for AI accelerators that don't have extensive safety features built-in. Typically, redundant execution comes at a high computational cost, requiring the model to run two or three times as much. To address this, the researchers take a co-design approach, integrating the reliable redundant execution with the normal, less reliable execution. This allows them to focus the additional computational expense only where it is truly necessary, making the overall system more efficient.

Technical Explanation

The key technical elements of the paper are:

  1. Redundant Execution: The authors propose using redundant execution as a way to ensure the reliable operation of AI models. This involves running the same model multiple times and comparing the outputs to detect any inconsistencies or errors.

  2. Co-Design Approach: To mitigate the high computational cost of redundant execution, the researchers take a co-design approach. This integrates the reliable redundant execution with the normal, less reliable execution, only applying the additional computational expense where strictly necessary.

  3. Hybrid CNN Architecture: The authors describe the design and implementation of a hybrid CNN architecture that combines the reliable and less reliable execution paths. This allows them to balance the need for dependability with computational efficiency.

  4. Preliminary Results: The paper presents some preliminary results demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach in improving the dependability of the CNN model without incurring excessive computational overhead.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to improving the safety and reliability of AI systems, particularly for AI accelerators without extensive documented safety features. The co-design approach to integrating redundant execution is a clever way to mitigate the high computational cost typically associated with this technique.

However, the paper only presents preliminary results, and more extensive testing and evaluation would be needed to fully assess the effectiveness and practicality of the approach. Additionally, the authors do not discuss potential limitations or caveats of their method, such as the types of errors or failures it may be able to detect and the potential for false positives or other edge cases.

Further research could also explore ways to explain the decision-making process of the hybrid CNN model, which could be important for gaining trust and understanding in safety-critical applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to making AI systems more safe and dependable by using redundant execution, a well-known technique, in a co-design manner to balance reliability and computational efficiency. The proposed hybrid CNN architecture demonstrates the potential of this approach, but more extensive testing and evaluation is needed to fully assess its capabilities and limitations.

Ultimately, the research highlights the importance of developing robust and explainable AI systems that can be trusted to operate safely and reliably, especially in critical applications. The authors' work contributes to the ongoing effort to make AI a more dependable technology for the benefit of society.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Hybrid Convolutional Neural Networks with Reliability Guarantee

Hans Dermot Doran, Suzana Veljanovska

Making AI safe and dependable requires the generation of dependable models and dependable execution of those models. We propose redundant execution as a well-known technique that can be used to ensure reliable execution of the AI model. This generic technique will extend the application scope of AI-accelerators that do not feature well-documented safety or dependability properties. Typical redundancy techniques incur at least double or triple the computational expense of the original. We adopt a co-design approach, integrating reliable model execution with non-reliable execution, focusing that additional computational expense only where it is strictly necessary. We describe the design, implementation and some preliminary results of a hybrid CNN.

Read more

5/10/2024

Cost-Effective Fault Tolerance for CNNs Using Parameter Vulnerability Based Hardening and Pruning
Total Score

0

Cost-Effective Fault Tolerance for CNNs Using Parameter Vulnerability Based Hardening and Pruning

Mohammad Hasan Ahmadilivani, Seyedhamidreza Mousavi, Jaan Raik, Masoud Daneshtalab, Maksim Jenihhin

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have become integral in safety-critical applications, thus raising concerns about their fault tolerance. Conventional hardware-dependent fault tolerance methods, such as Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR), are computationally expensive, imposing a remarkable overhead on CNNs. Whereas fault tolerance techniques can be applied either at the hardware level or at the model levels, the latter provides more flexibility without sacrificing generality. This paper introduces a model-level hardening approach for CNNs by integrating error correction directly into the neural networks. The approach is hardware-agnostic and does not require any changes to the underlying accelerator device. Analyzing the vulnerability of parameters enables the duplication of selective filters/neurons so that their output channels are effectively corrected with an efficient and robust correction layer. The proposed method demonstrates fault resilience nearly equivalent to TMR-based correction but with significantly reduced overhead. Nevertheless, there exists an inherent overhead to the baseline CNNs. To tackle this issue, a cost-effective parameter vulnerability based pruning technique is proposed that outperforms the conventional pruning method, yielding smaller networks with a negligible accuracy loss. Remarkably, the hardened pruned CNNs perform up to 24% faster than the hardened un-pruned ones.

Read more

5/20/2024

Evaluating Deep Neural Networks in Deployment (A Comparative and Replicability Study)
Total Score

0

Evaluating Deep Neural Networks in Deployment (A Comparative and Replicability Study)

Eduard Pinconschi, Divya Gopinath, Rui Abreu, Corina S. Pasareanu

As deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly used in safety-critical applications, there is a growing concern for their reliability. Even highly trained, high-performant networks are not 100% accurate. However, it is very difficult to predict their behavior during deployment without ground truth. In this paper, we provide a comparative and replicability study on recent approaches that have been proposed to evaluate the reliability of DNNs in deployment. We find that it is hard to run and reproduce the results for these approaches on their replication packages and even more difficult to run them on artifacts other than their own. Further, it is difficult to compare the effectiveness of the approaches, due to the lack of clearly defined evaluation metrics. Our results indicate that more effort is needed in our research community to obtain sound techniques for evaluating the reliability of neural networks in safety-critical domains. To this end, we contribute an evaluation framework that incorporates the considered approaches and enables evaluation on common benchmarks, using common metrics.

Read more

7/30/2024

VNN: Verification-Friendly Neural Networks with Hard Robustness Guarantees
Total Score

0

VNN: Verification-Friendly Neural Networks with Hard Robustness Guarantees

Anahita Baninajjar, Ahmed Rezine, Amir Aminifar

Machine learning techniques often lack formal correctness guarantees, evidenced by the widespread adversarial examples that plague most deep-learning applications. This lack of formal guarantees resulted in several research efforts that aim at verifying Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), with a particular focus on safety-critical applications. However, formal verification techniques still face major scalability and precision challenges. The over-approximation introduced during the formal verification process to tackle the scalability challenge often results in inconclusive analysis. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework to generate Verification-Friendly Neural Networks (VNNs). We present a post-training optimization framework to achieve a balance between preserving prediction performance and verification-friendliness. Our proposed framework results in VNNs that are comparable to the original DNNs in terms of prediction performance, while amenable to formal verification techniques. This essentially enables us to establish robustness for more VNNs than their DNN counterparts, in a time-efficient manner.

Read more

6/11/2024