A Reliability Theory of Compromise Decisions for Large-Scale Stochastic Programs
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper proposes a reliability theory for making compromise decisions in large-scale stochastic optimization programs.
- Stochastic optimization is a field that deals with optimization problems under uncertainty, where some of the inputs or parameters are random variables.
- The paper aims to develop a framework for making reliable decisions when dealing with these types of large-scale optimization problems with significant uncertainty.
Plain English Explanation
In the real world, many optimization problems we face involve uncertain or unpredictable elements. For example, a company planning its production schedule may need to account for fluctuations in raw material prices or customer demand, which can be hard to predict with certainty. [object Object] and [object Object] are two areas of research that have explored how to make decisions under uncertainty.
This paper tackles a similar challenge, but for very large-scale optimization problems. The authors propose a "reliability theory" to help make compromises or trade-offs when there are many competing objectives and significant uncertainty. The key idea is to find solutions that are reliable or robust, even if they may not be the absolute best in any single scenario.
The paper develops a mathematical framework and algorithms to implement this reliability theory. It involves modeling the uncertainty using probability distributions, and then finding solutions that balance multiple objectives while maintaining a high degree of reliability. This could be useful in fields like transportation planning, supply chain management, or infrastructure design, where large-scale optimization under uncertainty is common.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a "reliability theory of compromise decisions" for solving large-scale stochastic optimization problems. Stochastic optimization refers to optimization problems where some of the input parameters are random variables with known or estimated probability distributions.
The authors propose a framework for modeling the uncertainty in these problems using random variables, and then defining a reliability measure to quantify how "reliable" or "robust" a given solution is across the possible realizations of the random inputs. [object Object] is one related technical approach that could be compared.
The key idea is to find solutions that balance multiple, potentially conflicting objectives, while maintaining a high degree of reliability. This contrasts with approaches that simply optimize for the expected value of a single objective function, which can result in solutions that are very sensitive to the specific realization of the random inputs.
The paper develops algorithms to efficiently solve these reliability-based compromise optimization problems, even for very large-scale problem instances. It demonstrates the application of the proposed framework to a [object Object] and compares the reliability-based solutions to other benchmark approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and potentially impactful framework for tackling large-scale stochastic optimization problems. By incorporating a notion of reliability into the decision-making process, the approach can find solutions that are more robust to uncertainty compared to traditional expectation-based optimization.
However, the paper does not extensively discuss the limitations or potential downsides of the reliability theory approach. For example, it is not clear how the framework would handle cases where the underlying probability distributions are not well-known or difficult to estimate accurately. [object Object] is another relevant area that could provide additional insights.
Additionally, the computational complexity of the proposed algorithms may be a concern for truly massive-scale optimization problems. While the paper demonstrates the scalability of the approach, further research may be needed to understand its limitations and how it compares to other approximate or heuristic methods for large-scale stochastic optimization.
Overall, the reliability theory presented in the paper represents an interesting and potentially valuable contribution to the field of stochastic optimization. However, further research and real-world validation would be needed to fully assess its practical implications and limitations.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a novel "reliability theory of compromise decisions" for solving large-scale stochastic optimization problems. The key idea is to find solutions that balance multiple objectives while maintaining a high degree of reliability across possible realizations of the uncertain inputs.
The paper develops a mathematical framework and efficient algorithms to implement this reliability-based approach. It demonstrates the potential benefits of the approach through case studies, showing how it can produce more robust solutions compared to traditional expectation-based optimization.
While the paper represents an interesting and potentially impactful contribution to the field of stochastic optimization, further research would be needed to fully understand the limitations and practical applicability of the reliability theory, especially for the most massive-scale optimization problems. Nevertheless, this work opens up new avenues for exploring how to make reliable, compromise decisions in the face of significant uncertainty.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
A Reliability Theory of Compromise Decisions for Large-Scale Stochastic Programs
Shuotao Diao, Suvrajeet Sen
Stochastic programming models can lead to very large-scale optimization problems for which it may be impossible to enumerate all possible scenarios. In such cases, one adopts a sampling-based solution methodology in which case the reliability of the resulting decisions may be suspect. For such instances, it is advisable to adopt methodologies that promote variance reduction. One such approach goes under a framework known as compromise decision, which requires multiple replications of the solution procedure. This paper studies the reliability of stochastic programming solutions resulting from the compromise decision process. This process is characterized by minimizing an aggregation of objective function approximations across replications, presumably conducted in parallel. We refer to the post-parallel-processing problem as the problem of compromise decision. We quantify the reliability of compromise decisions by estimating the expectation and variance of the pessimistic distance of sampled instances from the set of true optimal decisions. Such pessimistic distance is defined as an estimate of the largest possible distance of the solution of the sampled instance from the true optimal solution set. The Rademacher average of instances is used to bound the sample complexity of the compromise decision.
Read more5/20/2024
⚙️
0
Risk-Adaptive Approaches to Stochastic Optimization: A Survey
Johannes O. Royset
Uncertainty is prevalent in engineering design, data-driven problems, and decision making broadly. Due to inherent risk-averseness and ambiguity about assumptions, it is common to address uncertainty by formulating and solving conservative optimization models expressed using measures of risk and related concepts. We survey the rapid development of risk measures over the last quarter century. From their beginning in financial engineering, we recount the spread to nearly all areas of engineering and applied mathematics. Solidly rooted in convex analysis, risk measures furnish a general framework for handling uncertainty with significant computational and theoretical advantages. We describe the key facts, list several concrete algorithms, and provide an extensive list of references for further reading. The survey recalls connections with utility theory and distributionally robust optimization, points to emerging applications areas such as fair machine learning, and defines measures of reliability.
Read more4/5/2024
0
On the KL-Divergence-based Robust Satisficing Model
Haojie Yan, Minglong Zhou, Jiayi Guo
Empirical risk minimization, a cornerstone in machine learning, is often hindered by the Optimizer's Curse stemming from discrepancies between the empirical and true data-generating distributions.To address this challenge, the robust satisficing framework has emerged recently to mitigate ambiguity in the true distribution. Distinguished by its interpretable hyperparameter and enhanced performance guarantees, this approach has attracted increasing attention from academia. However, its applicability in tackling general machine learning problems, notably deep neural networks, remains largely unexplored due to the computational challenges in solving this model efficiently across general loss functions. In this study, we delve into the Kullback Leibler divergence based robust satisficing model under a general loss function, presenting analytical interpretations, diverse performance guarantees, efficient and stable numerical methods, convergence analysis, and an extension tailored for hierarchical data structures. Through extensive numerical experiments across three distinct machine learning tasks, we demonstrate the superior performance of our model compared to state-of-the-art benchmarks.
Read more8/20/2024
🏅
0
The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
Laixi Shi, Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuxin Chen, Matthieu Geist, Yuejie Chi
This paper investigates model robustness in reinforcement learning (RL) to reduce the sim-to-real gap in practice. We adopt the framework of distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), aimed at learning a policy that optimizes the worst-case performance when the deployed environment falls within a prescribed uncertainty set around the nominal MDP. Despite recent efforts, the sample complexity of RMDPs remained mostly unsettled regardless of the uncertainty set in use. It was unclear if distributional robustness bears any statistical consequences when benchmarked against standard RL. Assuming access to a generative model that draws samples based on the nominal MDP, we characterize the sample complexity of RMDPs when the uncertainty set is specified via either the total variation (TV) distance or $chi^2$ divergence. The algorithm studied here is a model-based method called {em distributionally robust value iteration}, which is shown to be near-optimal for the full range of uncertainty levels. Somewhat surprisingly, our results uncover that RMDPs are not necessarily easier or harder to learn than standard MDPs. The statistical consequence incurred by the robustness requirement depends heavily on the size and shape of the uncertainty set: in the case w.r.t.~the TV distance, the minimax sample complexity of RMDPs is always smaller than that of standard MDPs; in the case w.r.t.~the $chi^2$ divergence, the sample complexity of RMDPs can often far exceed the standard MDP counterpart.
Read more4/15/2024