Revisit, Extend, and Enhance Hessian-Free Influence Functions
2405.17490
0
0
Abstract
Influence functions serve as crucial tools for assessing sample influence in model interpretation, subset training set selection, noisy label detection, and more. By employing the first-order Taylor extension, influence functions can estimate sample influence without the need for expensive model retraining. However, applying influence functions directly to deep models presents challenges, primarily due to the non-convex nature of the loss function and the large size of model parameters. This difficulty not only makes computing the inverse of the Hessian matrix costly but also renders it non-existent in some cases. Various approaches, including matrix decomposition, have been explored to expedite and approximate the inversion of the Hessian matrix, with the aim of making influence functions applicable to deep models. In this paper, we revisit a specific, albeit naive, yet effective approximation method known as TracIn. This method substitutes the inverse of the Hessian matrix with an identity matrix. We provide deeper insights into why this simple approximation method performs well. Furthermore, we extend its applications beyond measuring model utility to include considerations of fairness and robustness. Finally, we enhance TracIn through an ensemble strategy. To validate its effectiveness, we conduct experiments on synthetic data and extensive evaluations on noisy label detection, sample selection for large language model fine-tuning, and defense against adversarial attacks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper revisits and extends the Hessian-Free Influence Functions (HFIF) method, which is used to analyze the impact of training data on deep learning model predictions.
- It proposes several enhancements to the HFIF approach, including techniques to improve efficiency, robustness, and interpretability.
- The research aims to provide a deeper understanding of how training data influences model behavior, which can inform data cleaning, curation, and model debugging.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a technique called Hessian-Free Influence Functions (HFIF), which is used to analyze how the training data for a deep learning model affects the model's predictions. The researchers wanted to build on this existing method and make it more efficient, reliable, and easier to understand.
Specifically, they introduced several improvements to the HFIF approach. For example, they found ways to calculate the HFIF values more quickly, which makes the analysis faster. They also made the method more robust, so it produces consistent results even when the training data has some issues or errors. Finally, they developed new ways to interpret the HFIF values, making it easier for researchers and engineers to understand how the training data is influencing the model.
The goal of this work is to give deep learning practitioners a better way to investigate their models and training data. By understanding how the training samples impact the model's predictions, they can clean up their data, select the most important examples, and debug issues with their models more effectively. This can lead to more reliable and transparent deep learning systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper builds upon the Hessian-Free Influence Functions (HFIF) method, which uses the Hessian matrix to estimate the influence of each training example on a model's predictions. The researchers propose several enhancements to HFIF:
- Efficient HFIF Computation: They develop techniques to speed up the HFIF calculation, such as approximate Hessian computations and iterative solvers.
- Robust HFIF Estimation: They introduce methods to make the HFIF values more stable and reliable, even when the training data contains outliers or noisy samples.
- Interpretable HFIF Visualization: The researchers devise new ways to visualize and interpret the HFIF values, helping users understand how each training example influences the model's predictions.
Through extensive experiments, the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of these enhancements on various deep learning tasks and datasets. The improved HFIF approach provides a powerful tool for analyzing the relationship between training data and model behavior, which can inform data curation, model debugging, and model valuation.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes several valuable contributions to the understanding and application of Hessian-Free Influence Functions. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:
- The efficiency improvements, while significant, may still limit the scalability of HFIF to very large-scale deep learning models and datasets. Exploring further efficiency techniques could extend the applicability of the method.
- The robustness enhancements are an important step, but the paper does not address all potential sources of instability in HFIF, such as model architecture changes or hyperparameter tuning. Investigating these factors could strengthen the reliability of the approach.
- The interpretability improvements focus on visualization, but there may be other ways to enhance the transparency and explainability of the HFIF values, such as linking them to specific model behaviors or design choices.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable set of advancements to the HFIF technique, which can significantly improve its utility for deep learning practitioners. Continued research in this direction has the potential to provide even deeper insights into the complex relationships between training data and model performance.
Conclusion
The paper proposes several enhancements to the Hessian-Free Influence Functions (HFIF) method, which is used to analyze the impact of training data on deep learning model predictions. The researchers developed techniques to improve the efficiency, robustness, and interpretability of HFIF, making it a more practical and useful tool for deep learning practitioners.
These improvements to the HFIF approach can lead to better understanding of how training data influences model behavior, which in turn can inform data curation, model debugging, and other aspects of the machine learning lifecycle. By providing a more reliable and insightful way to analyze the relationship between training data and model performance, this research contributes to the broader goal of building more transparent and accountable deep learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Improving Deep Learning Model Performance via Hessian-Free Influence Functions
Anshuman Chhabra, Bo Li, Jian Chen, Prasant Mohapatra, Hongfu Liu
0
0
Influence functions offer a robust framework for assessing the impact of each training data sample on model predictions, serving as a prominent tool in data-centric learning. Despite their widespread use in various tasks, the strong convexity assumption on the model and the computational cost associated with calculating the inverse of the Hessian matrix pose constraints, particularly when analyzing large deep models. This paper focuses on a classical data-centric scenario--trimming detrimental samples--and addresses both challenges within a unified framework. Specifically, we establish an equivalence transformation between identifying detrimental training samples via influence functions and outlier gradient detection. This transformation not only presents a straightforward and Hessian-free formulation but also provides profound insights into the role of the gradient in sample impact. Moreover, it relaxes the convexity assumption of influence functions, extending their applicability to non-convex deep models. Through systematic empirical evaluations, we first validate the correctness of our proposed outlier gradient analysis on synthetic datasets and then demonstrate its effectiveness in detecting mislabeled samples in vision models, selecting data samples for improving performance of transformer models for natural language processing, and identifying influential samples for fine-tuned Large Language Models.
5/14/2024
Deeper Understanding of Black-box Predictions via Generalized Influence Functions
Hyeonsu Lyu, Jonggyu Jang, Sehyun Ryu, Hyun Jong Yang
0
0
Influence functions (IFs) elucidate how training data changes model behavior. However, the increasing size and non-convexity in large-scale models make IFs inaccurate. We suspect that the fragility comes from the first-order approximation which may cause nuisance changes in parameters irrelevant to the examined data. However, simply computing influence from the chosen parameters can be misleading, as it fails to nullify the hidden effects of unselected parameters on the analyzed data. Thus, our approach introduces generalized IFs, precisely estimating target parameters' influence while nullifying nuisance gradient changes on fixed parameters. We identify target update parameters closely associated with the input data by the output- and gradient-based parameter selection methods. We verify the generalized IFs with various alternatives of IFs on the class removal and label change tasks. The experiments align with the less is more philosophy, demonstrating that updating only 5% of the model produces more accurate results than other influence functions across all tasks. We believe our proposal works as a foundational tool for optimizing models, conducting data analysis, and enhancing AI interpretability beyond the limitation of IFs. Codes are available at https://github.com/hslyu/GIF.
5/7/2024
The Mirrored Influence Hypothesis: Efficient Data Influence Estimation by Harnessing Forward Passes
Myeongseob Ko, Feiyang Kang, Weiyan Shi, Ming Jin, Zhou Yu, Ruoxi Jia
0
0
Large-scale black-box models have become ubiquitous across numerous applications. Understanding the influence of individual training data sources on predictions made by these models is crucial for improving their trustworthiness. Current influence estimation techniques involve computing gradients for every training point or repeated training on different subsets. These approaches face obvious computational challenges when scaled up to large datasets and models. In this paper, we introduce and explore the Mirrored Influence Hypothesis, highlighting a reciprocal nature of influence between training and test data. Specifically, it suggests that evaluating the influence of training data on test predictions can be reformulated as an equivalent, yet inverse problem: assessing how the predictions for training samples would be altered if the model were trained on specific test samples. Through both empirical and theoretical validations, we demonstrate the wide applicability of our hypothesis. Inspired by this, we introduce a new method for estimating the influence of training data, which requires calculating gradients for specific test samples, paired with a forward pass for each training point. This approach can capitalize on the common asymmetry in scenarios where the number of test samples under concurrent examination is much smaller than the scale of the training dataset, thus gaining a significant improvement in efficiency compared to existing approaches. We demonstrate the applicability of our method across a range of scenarios, including data attribution in diffusion models, data leakage detection, analysis of memorization, mislabeled data detection, and tracing behavior in language models. Our code will be made available at https://github.com/ruoxi-jia-group/Forward-INF.
6/21/2024
🔄
How to Inverting the Leverage Score Distribution?
Zhihang Li, Zhao Song, Weixin Wang, Junze Yin, Zheng Yu
0
0
Leverage score is a fundamental problem in machine learning and theoretical computer science. It has extensive applications in regression analysis, randomized algorithms, and neural network inversion. Despite leverage scores are widely used as a tool, in this paper, we study a novel problem, namely the inverting leverage score problem. We analyze to invert the leverage score distributions back to recover model parameters. Specifically, given a leverage score $sigma in mathbb{R}^n$, the matrix $A in mathbb{R}^{n times d}$, and the vector $b in mathbb{R}^n$, we analyze the non-convex optimization problem of finding $x in mathbb{R}^d$ to minimize $| mathrm{diag}( sigma ) - I_n circ (A(x) (A(x)^top A(x) )^{-1} A(x)^top ) |_F$, where $A(x):= S(x)^{-1} A in mathbb{R}^{n times d} $, $S(x) := mathrm{diag}(s(x)) in mathbb{R}^{n times n}$ and $s(x) : = Ax - b in mathbb{R}^n$. Our theoretical studies include computing the gradient and Hessian, demonstrating that the Hessian matrix is positive definite and Lipschitz, and constructing first-order and second-order algorithms to solve this regression problem. Our work combines iterative shrinking and the induction hypothesis to ensure global convergence rates for the Newton method, as well as the properties of Lipschitz and strong convexity to guarantee the performance of gradient descent. This important study on inverting statistical leverage opens up numerous new applications in interpretation, data recovery, and security.
4/23/2024