The rising costs of training frontier AI models
2405.21015
1
0
Abstract
The costs of training frontier AI models have grown dramatically in recent years, but there is limited public data on the magnitude and growth of these expenses. This paper develops a detailed cost model to address this gap, estimating training costs using three approaches that account for hardware, energy, cloud rental, and staff expenses. The analysis reveals that the amortized cost to train the most compute-intensive models has grown precipitously at a rate of 2.4x per year since 2016 (95% CI: 2.0x to 3.1x). For key frontier models, such as GPT-4 and Gemini, the most significant expenses are AI accelerator chips and staff costs, each costing tens of millions of dollars. Other notable costs include server components (15-22%), cluster-level interconnect (9-13%), and energy consumption (2-6%). If the trend of growing development costs continues, the largest training runs will cost more than a billion dollars by 2027, meaning that only the most well-funded organizations will be able to finance frontier AI models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines the rising costs of training large-scale AI models, known as "frontier AI models", which are at the forefront of AI research and development.
- It explores the factors driving these increasing costs, including the growing demand for compute power, the need for specialized hardware, and the challenges of training models on massive datasets.
- The paper provides insights into the implications of these rising costs for the accessibility and democratization of AI development, as well as potential strategies for mitigating the financial barriers to entry.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the rising costs associated with training the most advanced and powerful AI models, often referred to as "frontier AI models." These models are at the cutting edge of AI research and development, and they require vast amounts of computing power, specialized hardware, and large datasets to train effectively.
As the demand for these frontier AI models continues to grow, the financial resources required to develop and deploy them have also been increasing. This poses challenges for smaller organizations, academic institutions, and individual researchers who may not have the same level of funding or access to the necessary resources as larger tech companies.
The paper explores the various factors contributing to these rising costs, such as the exponential growth in the size and complexity of AI models, the need for specialized and energy-intensive hardware like high-performance GPUs, and the challenges of processing and curating the massive datasets required for training these models.
By understanding the underlying drivers of these rising costs, the paper aims to provide insights into how the accessibility and democratization of AI development can be maintained, even as the technology continues to advance. This could involve exploring alternative approaches to model training, developing more efficient hardware and software solutions, or finding ways to share resources and computational power more effectively.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an analysis of the factors contributing to the rising costs of training frontier AI models, which are at the forefront of AI research and development. The authors examine the growing demand for compute power, the need for specialized hardware, and the challenges of training models on massive datasets.
One key factor is the exponential growth in the size and complexity of AI models, as evidenced by the emergence of billion-scale geospatial foundational models. This trend has led to a significant increase in the computational resources required to train these models effectively, as highlighted in the paper on the power-hungry nature of AI processing.
The paper also explores the role of specialized hardware, such as high-performance GPUs, in enabling the training of frontier AI models. As the demand for these models has grown, the costs associated with acquiring and operating this specialized hardware have also increased, as discussed in the paper on the power required for training.
Additionally, the paper addresses the challenges of training models on massive datasets, which are often necessary for frontier AI models to achieve state-of-the-art performance. The curation, storage, and processing of these large-scale datasets add significant complexity and cost to the training process, as explored in the paper on the importance of more compute power.
The paper also touches on the potential implications of these rising costs for the accessibility and democratization of AI development, highlighting the need for strategies to reduce the financial barriers to entry, as outlined in the paper on reducing barriers to entry for foundation model training.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough analysis of the factors contributing to the rising costs of training frontier AI models, but it also acknowledges several caveats and limitations. For example, the paper notes that the specific cost figures and trends may vary depending on the type of AI model, the hardware used, and the training process employed.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the challenges of maintaining accessibility and democratization in the face of these rising costs, it does not provide a comprehensive solution. The proposed strategies, such as exploring alternative training approaches or developing more efficient hardware and software solutions, require further research and implementation to fully address the problem.
One potential area for further exploration is the role of open-source initiatives, collaborative efforts, and access to shared computational resources in mitigating the financial barriers to entry for smaller organizations and individual researchers. The paper could have delved deeper into these potential avenues for cost-sharing and resource optimization.
Furthermore, the paper does not address the broader societal implications of the rising costs of frontier AI models, such as the potential for these technologies to exacerbate existing inequalities or concentrate power and influence in the hands of a few well-resourced entities. Exploring these wider implications could have provided a more holistic understanding of the challenges and their impact on the broader AI ecosystem.
Conclusion
The paper highlights the significant and growing costs associated with training frontier AI models, which are at the forefront of AI research and development. It identifies the key drivers behind these rising costs, including the exponential growth in model complexity, the need for specialized hardware, and the challenges of working with massive datasets.
The insights provided in the paper have important implications for the accessibility and democratization of AI development. As the financial barriers to entry continue to rise, there is a risk of AI progress becoming increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few well-resourced organizations, potentially limiting the diversity of perspectives and innovations in the field.
To address these challenges, the paper suggests the need for exploring alternative training approaches, developing more efficient hardware and software solutions, and finding ways to share resources and computational power more effectively. Implementing these strategies will be crucial in ensuring that the benefits of frontier AI models can be more widely accessible and that the field of AI can continue to thrive and evolve in a more inclusive and equitable manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Reducing the Barriers to Entry for Foundation Model Training
Paolo Faraboschi, Ellis Giles, Justin Hotard, Konstanty Owczarek, Andrew Wheeler
0
0
The world has recently witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in demands for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence applications. This spike in demand has imposed tremendous strain on the underlying technology stack in supply chain, GPU-accelerated hardware, software, datacenter power density, and energy consumption. If left on the current technological trajectory, future demands show insurmountable spending trends, further limiting market players, stifling innovation, and widening the technology gap. To address these challenges, we propose a fundamental change in the AI training infrastructure throughout the technology ecosystem. The changes require advancements in supercomputing and novel AI training approaches, from high-end software to low-level hardware, microprocessor, and chip design, while advancing the energy efficiency required by a sustainable infrastructure. This paper presents the analytical framework that quantitatively highlights the challenges and points to the opportunities to reduce the barriers to entry for training large language models.
4/16/2024
Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?
Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Yacine Jernite, Emma Strubell
0
0
Recent years have seen a surge in the popularity of commercial AI products based on generative, multi-purpose AI systems promising a unified approach to building machine learning (ML) models into technology. However, this ambition of ``generality'' comes at a steep cost to the environment, given the amount of energy these systems require and the amount of carbon that they emit. In this work, we propose the first systematic comparison of the ongoing inference cost of various categories of ML systems, covering both task-specific (i.e. finetuned models that carry out a single task) and `general-purpose' models, (i.e. those trained for multiple tasks). We measure deployment cost as the amount of energy and carbon required to perform 1,000 inferences on representative benchmark dataset using these models. We find that multi-purpose, generative architectures are orders of magnitude more expensive than task-specific systems for a variety of tasks, even when controlling for the number of model parameters. We conclude with a discussion around the current trend of deploying multi-purpose generative ML systems, and caution that their utility should be more intentionally weighed against increased costs in terms of energy and emissions. All the data from our study can be accessed via an interactive demo to carry out further exploration and analysis.
5/27/2024
✅
More Compute Is What You Need
Zhen Guo
0
0
Large language model pre-training has become increasingly expensive, with most practitioners relying on scaling laws to allocate compute budgets for model size and training tokens, commonly referred to as Compute-Optimal or Chinchilla Optimal. In this paper, we hypothesize a new scaling law that suggests model performance depends mostly on the amount of compute spent for transformer-based models, independent of the specific allocation to model size and dataset size. Using this unified scaling law, we predict that (a) for inference efficiency, training should prioritize smaller model sizes and larger training datasets, and (b) assuming the exhaustion of available web datasets, scaling the model size might be the only way to further improve model performance.
5/3/2024
Beyond Efficiency: Scaling AI Sustainably
Carole-Jean Wu, Bilge Acun, Ramya Raghavendra, Kim Hazelwood
0
0
Barroso's seminal contributions in energy-proportional warehouse-scale computing launched an era where modern datacenters have become more energy efficient and cost effective than ever before. At the same time, modern AI applications have driven ever-increasing demands in computing, highlighting the importance of optimizing efficiency across the entire deep learning model development cycle. This paper characterizes the carbon impact of AI, including both operational carbon emissions from training and inference as well as embodied carbon emissions from datacenter construction and hardware manufacturing. We highlight key efficiency optimization opportunities for cutting-edge AI technologies, from deep learning recommendation models to multi-modal generative AI tasks. To scale AI sustainably, we must also go beyond efficiency and optimize across the life cycle of computing infrastructures, from hardware manufacturing to datacenter operations and end-of-life processing for the hardware.
6/26/2024