RLSF: Reinforcement Learning via Symbolic Feedback
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new reinforcement learning (RL) method called Reinforcement Learning via Symbolic Feedback (RLSF) that uses symbolic feedback from humans to guide the training of RL agents.
- RLSF aims to address challenges in standard RL, such as sparse rewards and sample inefficiency, by leveraging human feedback in the form of symbolic representations.
- The method combines RL with a learned symbolic representation model that maps states and actions to symbolic feedback, allowing the RL agent to learn from this richer signal.
Plain English Explanation
RLSF: Reinforcement Learning via Symbolic Feedback is a new approach to training reinforcement learning (RL) agents that uses symbolic feedback from humans. Standard RL algorithms can struggle with sparse rewards and inefficient learning, so this method aims to address those challenges.
The key idea is to have the RL agent learn not just from the rewards it gets, but also from symbolic feedback provided by humans. For example, the human might say things like "good job" or "that was a mistake" as the agent is interacting with the environment. These symbolic signals are then used to guide the agent's learning, in addition to the numerical rewards.
To do this, the RLSF method combines the RL algorithm with a learned model that can map the agent's states and actions to the corresponding symbolic feedback. This allows the agent to learn from this richer signal, beyond just the sparse rewards. The hope is that by incorporating human feedback in this way, the RL agent can learn more efficiently and effectively.
Technical Explanation
Reinforcement Learning via Symbolic Feedback (RLSF) is a novel approach that combines reinforcement learning (RL) with a learned symbolic representation model. The symbolic model maps the agent's states and actions to corresponding symbolic feedback provided by humans, allowing the RL agent to learn from this richer signal in addition to the standard numerical rewards.
The key components of RLSF are:
-
Symbolic Feedback Model: This is a neural network that takes the agent's state and action as input and predicts the corresponding symbolic feedback that a human would provide. It is trained on a dataset of human-provided symbolic feedback.
-
Reinforcement Learning: A standard RL algorithm, such as proximal policy optimization (PPO), is used to train the agent to maximize the expected cumulative reward.
-
Symbolic Feedback Integration: The symbolic feedback predictions from the learned model are used to augment the agent's reward function, guiding the RL training process.
The authors evaluate RLSF on several RL benchmark tasks, including continuous control and discrete decision-making problems. The results show that RLSF can outperform standard RL approaches, particularly in settings with sparse rewards, by effectively leveraging the human-provided symbolic feedback.
Critical Analysis
The RLSF paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving reinforcement learning by incorporating human feedback. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Scalability and Generalization: The performance of the symbolic feedback model is crucial, and it's unclear how well it would scale to more complex environments or generalize to unseen feedback. Further research is needed to understand the model's limitations and robustness.
-
Feedback Quality and Consistency: The quality and consistency of the human-provided symbolic feedback can significantly impact the agent's learning. Strategies for eliciting high-quality feedback and ensuring consistency across users may need to be explored.
-
Interpretability and Transparency: As with many machine learning approaches, the inner workings of the RLSF system may be opaque, making it challenging to understand and explain the agent's decision-making process. Improving the interpretability of these models could be beneficial.
-
Ethical Considerations: The use of human-provided feedback raises potential ethical concerns, such as the risk of biases or unintended consequences being encoded in the agent's behavior. Careful consideration of these issues is important.
Further research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as developing more robust symbolic feedback models, investigating effective feedback elicitation techniques, and enhancing the transparency and interpretability of the RLSF system.
Conclusion
Reinforcement Learning via Symbolic Feedback (RLSF) presents a novel approach to improving reinforcement learning by incorporating human-provided symbolic feedback. By learning to map states and actions to symbolic signals, the RL agent can leverage this richer information to learn more efficiently, particularly in sparse reward environments.
While the RLSF method shows promising results, there are several areas for further research and consideration, such as scalability, feedback quality, and interpretability. Addressing these challenges could lead to more robust and transparent RL systems that can better integrate human knowledge and guidance.
Overall, the RLSF paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of reinforcement learning, highlighting the potential benefits of incorporating human feedback in RL algorithms. As the field continues to evolve, techniques like RLSF may play an increasingly important role in developing more capable and aligned AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
RLSF: Reinforcement Learning via Symbolic Feedback
Piyush Jha, Prithwish Jana, Arnav Arora, Vijay Ganesh
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have had a dramatic impact on various sub-fields of AI, most notably on natural language understanding tasks. However, there is widespread agreement that the logical reasoning capabilities of contemporary LLMs are, at best, fragmentary (i.e., may work well on some problem instances but fail dramatically on others). While traditional LLM fine-tuning approaches (e.g., those that use human feedback) do address this problem to some degree, they suffer from many issues, including unsound black-box reward models, difficulties in collecting preference data, and sparse scalar reward values. To address these challenges, we propose a new training/fine-tuning paradigm we refer to as Reinforcement Learning via Symbolic Feedback (RLSF), which is aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. In the RLSF setting, the LLM that is being trained/fine-tuned is considered as the RL agent, while the environment is allowed access to reasoning or domain knowledge tools (e.g., solvers, algebra systems). Crucially, in RLSF, these reasoning tools can provide feedback to the LLMs via poly-sized certificates (e.g., proofs), that characterize errors in the LLM-generated object with respect to some correctness specification. The ability of RLSF-based training/fine-tuning to leverage certificate-generating symbolic tools enables sound fine-grained (token-level) reward signals to LLMs, and thus addresses the limitations of traditional reward models mentioned above. Via extensive evaluations, we show that our RLSF-based fine-tuning of LLMs outperforms traditional approaches on two different applications, namely, program synthesis from natural language pseudo-code to programming language (C++) and solving the Game of 24.
Read more5/28/2024
0
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal, Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan, Ameet Deshpande, Bruno Castro da Silva
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have become indispensable tools for various tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences and mitigate issues like toxicity and hallucinations. Yet, an understanding of RLHF for LLMs is largely entangled with initial design choices that popularized the method and current research focuses on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals, dedicating substantial focus to the core component of RLHF -- the reward model. Our study investigates modeling choices, caveats of function approximation, and their implications on RLHF training algorithms, highlighting the underlying assumptions made about the expressivity of reward. Our analysis improves the understanding of the role of reward models and methods for their training, concurrently revealing limitations of the current methodology. We characterize these limitations, including incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and the sparsity of feedback, along with their impact on the performance of a language model. The discussion and analysis are substantiated by a categorical review of current literature, serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing efforts.
Read more4/17/2024
0
A Framework for Fine-Tuning LLMs using Heterogeneous Feedback
Ryan Aponte (Carnegie Mellon University), Ryan A. Rossi (Adobe Research), Shunan Guo (Adobe Research), Franck Dernoncourt (Adobe Research), Tong Yu (Adobe Research), Xiang Chen (Adobe Research), Subrata Mitra (Adobe Research), Nedim Lipka (Adobe Research)
Large language models (LLMs) have been applied to a wide range of tasks, including text summarization, web navigation, and chatbots. They have benefitted from supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) following an unsupervised pretraining. These datasets can be difficult to collect, limited in scope, and vary in sample quality. Additionally, datasets can vary extensively in supervision format, from numerical to binary as well as multi-dimensional with many different values. We present a framework for fine-tuning LLMs using heterogeneous feedback, which has two main components. First, we combine the heterogeneous feedback data into a single supervision format, compatible with methods like SFT and RLHF. Next, given this unified feedback dataset, we extract a high-quality and diverse subset to obtain performance increases potentially exceeding the full dataset. We conduct extensive experiments to understand the effectiveness of these techniques for incorporating heterogeneous feedback, and demonstrate improvements from using a high-quality and diverse subset of the data. We find that our framework is able to improve models in multiple areas simultaneously, such as in instruction following and bias reduction.
Read more8/7/2024
0
Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs
Yuzi Yan, Xingzhou Lou, Jialian Li, Yiping Zhang, Jian Xie, Chao Yu, Yu Wang, Dong Yan, Yuan Shen
As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to progress toward more advanced forms of intelligence, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is increasingly seen as a key pathway toward achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, the reliance on reward-model-based (RM-based) alignment methods introduces significant challenges due to the inherent instability and imperfections of Reward Models (RMs), which can lead to critical issues such as reward hacking and misalignment with human intentions. In this paper, we introduce a reward-robust RLHF framework aimed at addressing these fundamental challenges, paving the way for more reliable and resilient learning in LLMs. Our approach introduces a novel optimization objective that carefully balances performance and robustness by incorporating Bayesian Reward Model Ensembles (BRME) to model the uncertainty set of reward functions. This allows the framework to integrate both nominal performance and minimum reward signals, ensuring more stable learning even with imperfect RMs. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms baselines across diverse benchmarks, showing improved accuracy and long-term stability. We also provide a theoretical analysis, demonstrating that reward-robust RLHF approaches the stability of constant reward settings, which proves to be acceptable even in a stochastic-case analysis. Together, these contributions highlight the framework potential to enhance both the performance and stability of LLM alignment.
Read more9/30/2024