Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Adversarial Perturbations in Action Space
2405.11982
0
0
Abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms can suffer from modeling errors between the simulation and the real world. Many studies use adversarial learning to generate perturbation during training process to model the discrepancy and improve the robustness of DRL. However, most of these approaches use a fixed parameter to control the intensity of the adversarial perturbation, which can lead to a trade-off between average performance and robustness. In fact, finding the optimal parameter of the perturbation is challenging, as excessive perturbations may destabilize training and compromise agent performance, while insufficient perturbations may not impart enough information to enhance robustness. To keep the training stable while improving robustness, we propose a simple but effective method, namely, Adaptive Adversarial Perturbation (A2P), which can dynamically select appropriate adversarial perturbations for each sample. Specifically, we propose an adaptive adversarial coefficient framework to adjust the effect of the adversarial perturbation during training. By designing a metric for the current intensity of the perturbation, our method can calculate the suitable perturbation levels based on the current relative performance. The appealing feature of our method is that it is simple to deploy in real-world applications and does not require accessing the simulator in advance. The experiments in MuJoCo show that our method can improve the training stability and learn a robust policy when migrated to different test environments. The code is available at https://github.com/Lqm00/A2P-SAC.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper proposes a novel method for making deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents more robust to adversarial attacks in the action space.
- The key idea is to train the RL agent to learn an adaptive perturbation policy that can generate adversarial perturbations to its own actions, making the agent more resilient to external adversarial attacks.
- The method is evaluated on several challenging continuous control tasks and demonstrates significant improvements in robustness compared to baseline RL approaches.
Plain English Explanation
In the world of artificial intelligence and machine learning, researchers are constantly working to make AI systems more reliable and secure. One area of growing concern is the vulnerability of reinforcement learning (RL) agents to adversarial attacks, where small, carefully crafted perturbations to the agent's inputs or actions can cause it to behave in unexpected and potentially harmful ways.
This research paper tackles this challenge head-on by proposing a new technique for training RL agents to be more robust to adversarial attacks in the action space. The key insight is that rather than waiting for an external adversary to try and manipulate the agent's actions, the agent can learn to proactively generate its own adversarial perturbations during training. This allows the agent to become more resilient to a wider range of potential attacks, as it has learned to anticipate and adapt to adversarial threats.
The researchers achieve this by training the RL agent to learn an "adaptive perturbation policy" - a model that can generate adversarial perturbations to the agent's own actions in a way that is optimized for the specific task and environment. This perturbation policy is then incorporated into the overall RL training process, enabling the agent to learn a more robust and versatile control policy.
The researchers evaluate their approach on several challenging continuous control tasks, such as link to "Towards Robust Policy: Enhancing Offline Reinforcement Learning" and link to "Safe Deep Policy Adaptation". They show that their method significantly outperforms baseline RL approaches in terms of robustness to adversarial attacks, demonstrating the promise of this approach for building more secure and reliable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contributions of this research paper are:
-
Adaptive Adversarial Perturbation Policy: The researchers propose a novel architecture that combines the RL agent's policy network with an additional "perturbation policy" network. This perturbation policy is trained to generate small, adaptive perturbations to the agent's actions, with the goal of making the agent more resilient to adversarial attacks.
-
Integrated Training Objective: The training of the RL agent and the perturbation policy is done in an integrated manner, where the agent's objective function is augmented with an additional term that encourages the perturbation policy to generate adversarial perturbations that the agent can learn to handle effectively. This helps the agent and the perturbation policy co-evolve towards a more robust control policy.
-
Evaluation on Challenging Benchmarks: The researchers evaluate their method on several continuous control tasks, including link to "Toward Evaluating the Robustness of Reinforcement Learning Agents" and link to "Adaptive Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control". They demonstrate that their approach significantly outperforms baseline RL methods in terms of robustness to adversarial attacks, suggesting its potential for practical applications.
The key technical insight behind this work is the idea of proactively training the RL agent to generate its own adversarial perturbations, rather than waiting for an external adversary to attack. This allows the agent to learn a more versatile and robust control policy that can better handle a wide range of potential threats, as demonstrated by the impressive results on the benchmarks.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have clearly put a lot of thought and effort into designing their approach, and the results they present are quite promising. That said, there are a few potential caveats and areas for further research that are worth considering:
-
Computational Overhead: The addition of the perturbation policy network may increase the computational complexity and training time of the overall system, which could be a concern for real-world applications with strict resource constraints.
-
Generalization to Unseen Attacks: While the method demonstrates strong performance against the specific adversarial attacks used in the evaluation, it's unclear how well it would generalize to completely novel types of attacks that the agent has not encountered during training. Link to "Boosting Model Resilience via Implicit Adversarial Data" highlights the importance of addressing this challenge.
-
Interpretability and Explainability: As with many deep learning-based approaches, the inner workings of the perturbation policy and its interactions with the main RL agent may be difficult to interpret and explain, which could be a concern for applications where transparency and accountability are important.
Overall, this research represents an interesting and promising step forward in the quest for robust and secure reinforcement learning systems. While there are some potential areas for improvement and further investigation, the core idea of proactively training RL agents to handle adversarial threats is certainly worth exploring further.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel approach for making deep reinforcement learning agents more robust to adversarial attacks in the action space. By training the agents to learn an adaptive perturbation policy that can generate their own adversarial perturbations during training, the researchers have demonstrated significant improvements in robustness compared to baseline RL methods across several challenging continuous control tasks.
The key technical contributions of this work, including the integrated training objective and the evaluation on benchmark tasks, suggest that this approach could be a valuable tool for building more secure and reliable AI systems. While there are some potential caveats and areas for further research, the overall results are quite promising and could have important implications for the field of reinforcement learning and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards Robust Policy: Enhancing Offline Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attacks and Defenses
Thanh Nguyen, Tung M. Luu, Tri Ton, Chang D. Yoo
0
0
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) addresses the challenge of expensive and high-risk data exploration inherent in RL by pre-training policies on vast amounts of offline data, enabling direct deployment or fine-tuning in real-world environments. However, this training paradigm can compromise policy robustness, leading to degraded performance in practical conditions due to observation perturbations or intentional attacks. While adversarial attacks and defenses have been extensively studied in deep learning, their application in offline RL is limited. This paper proposes a framework to enhance the robustness of offline RL models by leveraging advanced adversarial attacks and defenses. The framework attacks the actor and critic components by perturbing observations during training and using adversarial defenses as regularization to enhance the learned policy. Four attacks and two defenses are introduced and evaluated on the D4RL benchmark. The results show the vulnerability of both the actor and critic to attacks and the effectiveness of the defenses in improving policy robustness. This framework holds promise for enhancing the reliability of offline RL models in practical scenarios.
5/21/2024
Robust Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with an Adversarial Auxiliary Model
Siemen Herremans, Ali Anwar, Siegfried Mercelis
0
0
Reinforcement learning has demonstrated impressive performance in various challenging problems such as robotics, board games, and classical arcade games. However, its real-world applications can be hindered by the absence of robustness and safety in the learned policies. More specifically, an RL agent that trains in a certain Markov decision process (MDP) often struggles to perform well in nearly identical MDPs. To address this issue, we employ the framework of Robust MDPs (RMDPs) in a model-based setting and introduce a novel learned transition model. Our method specifically incorporates an auxiliary pessimistic model, updated adversarially, to estimate the worst-case MDP within a Kullback-Leibler uncertainty set. In comparison to several existing works, our work does not impose any additional conditions on the training environment, such as the need for a parametric simulator. To test the effectiveness of the proposed pessimistic model in enhancing policy robustness, we integrate it into a practical RL algorithm, called Robust Model-Based Policy Optimization (RMBPO). Our experimental results indicate a notable improvement in policy robustness on high-dimensional MuJoCo control tasks, with the auxiliary model enhancing the performance of the learned policy in distorted MDPs. We further explore the learned deviation between the proposed auxiliary world model and the nominal model, to examine how pessimism is achieved. By learning a pessimistic world model and demonstrating its role in improving policy robustness, our research contributes towards making (model-based) RL more robust.
6/17/2024
Safe Deep Policy Adaptation
Wenli Xiao, Tairan He, John Dolan, Guanya Shi
0
0
A critical goal of autonomy and artificial intelligence is enabling autonomous robots to rapidly adapt in dynamic and uncertain environments. Classic adaptive control and safe control provide stability and safety guarantees but are limited to specific system classes. In contrast, policy adaptation based on reinforcement learning (RL) offers versatility and generalizability but presents safety and robustness challenges. We propose SafeDPA, a novel RL and control framework that simultaneously tackles the problems of policy adaptation and safe reinforcement learning. SafeDPA jointly learns adaptive policy and dynamics models in simulation, predicts environment configurations, and fine-tunes dynamics models with few-shot real-world data. A safety filter based on the Control Barrier Function (CBF) on top of the RL policy is introduced to ensure safety during real-world deployment. We provide theoretical safety guarantees of SafeDPA and show the robustness of SafeDPA against learning errors and extra perturbations. Comprehensive experiments on (1) classic control problems (Inverted Pendulum), (2) simulation benchmarks (Safety Gym), and (3) a real-world agile robotics platform (RC Car) demonstrate great superiority of SafeDPA in both safety and task performance, over state-of-the-art baselines. Particularly, SafeDPA demonstrates notable generalizability, achieving a 300% increase in safety rate compared to the baselines, under unseen disturbances in real-world experiments.
4/30/2024
🏅
Toward Evaluating Robustness of Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Policy
Xiang Zheng, Xingjun Ma, Shengjie Wang, Xinyu Wang, Chao Shen, Cong Wang
0
0
Reinforcement learning agents are susceptible to evasion attacks during deployment. In single-agent environments, these attacks can occur through imperceptible perturbations injected into the inputs of the victim policy network. In multi-agent environments, an attacker can manipulate an adversarial opponent to influence the victim policy's observations indirectly. While adversarial policies offer a promising technique to craft such attacks, current methods are either sample-inefficient due to poor exploration strategies or require extra surrogate model training under the black-box assumption. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose Intrinsically Motivated Adversarial Policy (IMAP) for efficient black-box adversarial policy learning in both single- and multi-agent environments. We formulate four types of adversarial intrinsic regularizers -- maximizing the adversarial state coverage, policy coverage, risk, or divergence -- to discover potential vulnerabilities of the victim policy in a principled way. We also present a novel bias-reduction method to balance the extrinsic objective and the adversarial intrinsic regularizers adaptively. Our experiments validate the effectiveness of the four types of adversarial intrinsic regularizers and the bias-reduction method in enhancing black-box adversarial policy learning across a variety of environments. Our IMAP successfully evades two types of defense methods, adversarial training and robust regularizer, decreasing the performance of the state-of-the-art robust WocaR-PPO agents by 34%-54% across four single-agent tasks. IMAP also achieves a state-of-the-art attacking success rate of 83.91% in the multi-agent game YouShallNotPass. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/x-zheng16/IMAP}.
4/29/2024