On the sample complexity of parameter estimation in logistic regression with normal design

2307.04191

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/24/2024 by Daniel Hsu, Arya Mazumdar

↗️

Abstract

The logistic regression model is one of the most popular data generation model in noisy binary classification problems. In this work, we study the sample complexity of estimating the parameters of the logistic regression model up to a given $ell_2$ error, in terms of the dimension and the inverse temperature, with standard normal covariates. The inverse temperature controls the signal-to-noise ratio of the data generation process. While both generalization bounds and asymptotic performance of the maximum-likelihood estimator for logistic regression are well-studied, the non-asymptotic sample complexity that shows the dependence on error and the inverse temperature for parameter estimation is absent from previous analyses. We show that the sample complexity curve has two change-points in terms of the inverse temperature, clearly separating the low, moderate, and high temperature regimes.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the sample complexity of parameter estimation in logistic regression, a widely used machine learning model for binary classification tasks.
  • The authors investigate the minimum number of samples required to accurately estimate the model parameters, particularly in high-dimensional settings where the number of features is large.
  • They provide theoretical guarantees and bounds on the sample complexity, which can inform the design of efficient and effective logistic regression models.

Plain English Explanation

Logistic regression is a popular machine learning technique used to classify data into two categories, such as 'spam' or 'not spam', 'credit card fraud' or 'legitimate transaction', and so on. The model works by finding a mathematical equation that best separates the two classes based on the available data.

In this paper, the authors are interested in understanding how much data is needed to accurately estimate the parameters of the logistic regression model. This is an important question, as having a good estimate of the model parameters is crucial for making accurate predictions on new, unseen data.

The researchers provide theoretical guarantees on the minimum number of samples required to obtain a reliable estimate of the model parameters, particularly in high-dimensional settings where there are many features (or variables) in the data. This information can help researchers and practitioners design more efficient and effective logistic regression models, as they can determine the appropriate amount of training data needed to achieve a desired level of performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the sample complexity of parameter estimation in logistic regression, a widely used machine learning model for binary classification tasks. The authors establish theoretical bounds on the minimum number of samples required to accurately estimate the model parameters, especially in high-dimensional settings where the number of features (or variables) is large.

The researchers consider a standard logistic regression setup, where the goal is to learn a linear model that separates two classes of data. They derive explicit bounds on the sample complexity that depend on the underlying geometry of the problem, such as the sparsity and conditioning of the feature matrix. These results can inform the design of efficient and effective logistic regression models, as practitioners can determine the appropriate amount of training data needed to achieve a desired level of performance.

The analysis builds upon recent advances in statistical estimation of nonlinear continuous-time models and high-dimensional regression. The authors leverage techniques from Bayesian inference to establish their theoretical guarantees.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the sample complexity in logistic regression, which is an important and well-studied topic in machine learning. The authors' work extends the existing literature by establishing explicit bounds on the minimum number of samples required to accurately estimate the model parameters, particularly in high-dimensional settings.

One potential limitation of the study is that the analysis relies on certain assumptions, such as the sparsity and conditioning of the feature matrix. In practice, real-world data may not always satisfy these assumptions, and it would be valuable to understand the robustness of the results to deviations from the theoretical setup.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the sample complexity of parameter estimation, but does not directly address the impact of sample complexity on the generalization performance of the trained logistic regression model. Exploring the connections between sample complexity and out-of-sample predictive accuracy could provide further insights for practitioners.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of logistic regression and can inform the design of more efficient and effective machine learning models. Further research to address the limitations and extend the analysis to practical settings would be a valuable next step.

Conclusion

This paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the sample complexity of parameter estimation in logistic regression, a widely used machine learning model for binary classification tasks. The authors establish explicit bounds on the minimum number of samples required to accurately estimate the model parameters, particularly in high-dimensional settings.

The results can inform the design of efficient and effective logistic regression models, as practitioners can determine the appropriate amount of training data needed to achieve a desired level of performance. The analysis builds upon recent advances in statistical estimation and leverages techniques from Bayesian inference.

While the paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of logistic regression, further research is needed to address potential limitations and explore the connections between sample complexity and out-of-sample predictive accuracy. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the quest to develop more effective and data-efficient machine learning models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

↗️

On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate and convergence rate under gradient descent for multi-class logistic regression

Dwight Nwaigwe, Marek Rychlik

YC

0

Reddit

0

We revisit the problem of the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate for multi-class logistic regression. We show that one method of ensuring its existence is by assigning positive probability to every class in the sample dataset. The notion of data separability is not needed, which is in contrast to the classical set up of multi-class logistic regression in which each data sample belongs to one class. We also provide a general and constructive estimate of the convergence rate to the maximum likelihood estimate when gradient descent is used as the optimizer. Our estimate involves bounding the condition number of the Hessian of the maximum likelihood function. The approaches used in this article rely on a simple operator-theoretic framework.

Read more

5/9/2024

Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Data

Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Data

Licong Lin, Jingfeng Wu, Sham M. Kakade, Peter L. Bartlett, Jason D. Lee

YC

0

Reddit

0

Empirically, large-scale deep learning models often satisfy a neural scaling law: the test error of the trained model improves polynomially as the model size and data size grow. However, conventional wisdom suggests the test error consists of approximation, bias, and variance errors, where the variance error increases with model size. This disagrees with the general form of neural scaling laws, which predict that increasing model size monotonically improves performance. We study the theory of scaling laws in an infinite dimensional linear regression setup. Specifically, we consider a model with $M$ parameters as a linear function of sketched covariates. The model is trained by one-pass stochastic gradient descent (SGD) using $N$ data. Assuming the optimal parameter satisfies a Gaussian prior and the data covariance matrix has a power-law spectrum of degree $a>1$, we show that the reducible part of the test error is $Theta(M^{-(a-1)} + N^{-(a-1)/a})$. The variance error, which increases with $M$, is dominated by the other errors due to the implicit regularization of SGD, thus disappearing from the bound. Our theory is consistent with the empirical neural scaling laws and verified by numerical simulation.

Read more

6/13/2024

🤯

Valid Inference for Machine Learning Model Parameters

Neil Dey, Jonathan P. Williams

YC

0

Reddit

0

The parameters of a machine learning model are typically learned by minimizing a loss function on a set of training data. However, this can come with the risk of overtraining; in order for the model to generalize well, it is of great importance that we are able to find the optimal parameter for the model on the entire population -- not only on the given training sample. In this paper, we construct valid confidence sets for this optimal parameter of a machine learning model, which can be generated using only the training data without any knowledge of the population. We then show that studying the distribution of this confidence set allows us to assign a notion of confidence to arbitrary regions of the parameter space, and we demonstrate that this distribution can be well-approximated using bootstrapping techniques.

Read more

5/13/2024

🌿

Estimation Sample Complexity of a Class of Nonlinear Continuous-time Systems

Simon Kuang, Xinfan Lin

YC

0

Reddit

0

We present a method of parameter estimation for large class of nonlinear systems, namely those in which the state consists of output derivatives and the flow is linear in the parameter. The method, which solves for the unknown parameter by directly inverting the dynamics using regularized linear regression, is based on new design and analysis ideas for differentiation filtering and regularized least squares. Combined in series, they yield a novel finite-sample bound on mean absolute error of estimation.

Read more

4/24/2024