Show Less, Instruct More: Enriching Prompts with Definitions and Guidelines for Zero-Shot NER

Overview

• This paper proposes a novel approach to named entity recognition (NER) using large language models in a zero-shot or few-shot setting.
• The key idea is to enrich prompts with definitions and guidelines to better instruct the language model on the task, rather than just providing a brief prompt.
• The authors show that this "Show Less, Instruct More" approach can significantly improve the zero-shot NER performance of language models compared to standard prompt-based methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a challenging task called named entity recognition (NER), where the goal is to identify and classify important names, places, organizations, and other entities in text. Typically, NER models are trained on large datasets of annotated examples to learn how to recognize these entities. However, the authors wanted to explore how well language models could perform NER without any labeled training data, in a "zero-shot" setting.

Their key insight was that rather than just giving the language model a brief prompt (e.g., "Identify the entities in this text"), they could provide much richer instructions and definitions to help guide the model. For example, they might define what different entity types are (e.g., "a person is an individual human") and give detailed guidelines on how to recognize them.

By "showing less" in terms of training data but "instructing more" through prompts, the authors found they could significantly improve the zero-shot NER performance of large language models. This is an important finding, as it suggests we may be able to deploy powerful NLP capabilities without the need for large, curated datasets - which can be costly and time-consuming to create.

The paper builds on a growing body of research exploring how to effectively prompt and instruct language models to perform various tasks, such as rewriting prompts, zero-shot generation, role-playing, and few-shot learning.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a "Show Less, Instruct More" approach to zero-shot named entity recognition (NER) using large language models. Rather than providing the model with just a brief prompt (e.g., "Identify the entities in this text"), the authors enrich the prompt with detailed definitions and guidelines for the task.

For example, the prompt might include definitions of different entity types (e.g., "a person is an individual human") and instructions on how to recognize them (e.g., "look for capitalized words that refer to a specific individual"). The authors show that this richer prompt can significantly improve the zero-shot NER performance of language models compared to standard prompt-based methods.

The authors evaluate their approach on several NER datasets, comparing it to both zero-shot baselines and few-shot models fine-tuned on limited training data. They find consistent improvements, with the "Show Less, Instruct More" approach outperforming the alternatives across a range of entity types and domains.

The key technical contributions of the paper include:

1. A novel prompt engineering methodology that incorporates rich definitions and guidelines to better instruct language models on the NER task.
2. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach for zero-shot and few-shot NER.
3. Analyses uncovering the factors that contribute to the performance gains, such as the importance of clear entity type definitions and task-specific guidelines.

Overall, the paper demonstrates the value of going beyond simplistic prompts and instead investing effort into carefully crafting richer instructions for language models. This work aligns with a broader trend in the field toward more intentional and informative prompting strategies.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the "Show Less, Instruct More" approach to zero-shot NER, and the results are quite promising. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research worth considering:

1. Generalization to other tasks: While the authors show strong results for NER, it's unclear how well the prompt engineering methodology would generalize to other language understanding or generation tasks. More research is needed to understand the broader applicability of this approach.

2. Prompt engineering effort: Crafting rich, informative prompts requires significant time and effort. The authors acknowledge this, but don't fully address the scalability challenges. Automated or semi-automated prompt engineering tools could help mitigate this.

3. Evaluation on more diverse datasets: The authors focus on well-studied NER datasets, but it would be valuable to see how the approach performs on more diverse, real-world text sources (e.g., social media, clinical notes, etc.) with varying levels of noise and ambiguity.

4. Comparison to few-shot fine-tuning: While the paper compares to few-shot baselines, it would be interesting to see a more detailed analysis of the tradeoffs between the "Show Less, Instruct More" approach and standard fine-tuning techniques, especially as dataset sizes increase.

Overall, this is a well-executed and insightful paper that makes a meaningful contribution to the growing field of prompting and instruction-guided language models. The authors have clearly put a lot of thought into the prompt engineering process, and their findings have important implications for the development of more capable and flexible NLP systems.

Conclusion

The "Show Less, Instruct More" paper presents a novel approach to zero-shot named entity recognition that significantly outperforms standard prompt-based methods. By enriching prompts with detailed definitions and guidelines, the authors demonstrate how language models can be better instructed to perform the NER task without any labeled training data.

This work aligns with broader trends in the field towards more intentional and informative prompting strategies, which hold great promise for deploying powerful NLP capabilities without the need for large, curated datasets. While the authors focus on NER, the prompt engineering methodology could potentially be applied to a wider range of language understanding and generation tasks.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the ongoing research on prompt-based learning and zero-shot/few-shot adaptation of language models. The findings have implications for the development of more flexible and robust NLP systems that can generalize to new domains and tasks with minimal supervision.