Socialz: Multi-Feature Social Fuzz Testing

Read original: arXiv:2302.08664 - Published 7/8/2024 by Francisco Zanartu, Christoph Treude, Markus Wagner
Total Score

0

๐Ÿงช

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Online social networks have become an integral part of our daily lives.
  • Bugs and glitches in these networks can cause problems ranging from frustrating to serious data leaks.
  • Fuzz testing, a method of testing with randomized inputs, can help improve the reliability and security of social networks.
  • Implementing traditional fuzz testing methods can be difficult for programmers outside the social network's development team.
  • Socialz is a novel approach to social fuzz testing that aims to put these tools in everyone's hands.

Plain English Explanation

Online social networks have become a crucial part of our daily lives, allowing us to connect with friends, family, and communities. However, even small bugs or glitches in these networks can cause a range of issues, from minor annoyances to major data breaches that can significantly impact millions of users.

To address these risks, a technique called fuzz testing can be used. Fuzz testing involves feeding a program with random, unexpected inputs to see how it handles them and uncover potential issues. This approach can help improve the reliability and security of social networks.

Unfortunately, implementing traditional fuzz testing methods can be quite challenging for programmers who are not part of the social network's development team. This is where Socialz comes in. Socialz is a new way to do social fuzz testing that aims to make these tools more accessible to a wider range of people.

Socialz does this by (1) understanding the characteristics of real social network users, (2) using evolutionary computation to diversify the way these users interact with the network across multiple features, and (3) collecting performance data as these interactions are carried out. By making social fuzz testing more widely available, Socialz hopes to improve the overall reliability and security of the social networks we use every day.

Technical Explanation

The researchers behind Socialz recognized the need for improved fuzz testing methods for online social networks. Traditional fuzz testing approaches can be difficult for programmers outside the social network's development team to implement, which limits the ability to thoroughly test these critical systems.

To address this challenge, the Socialz approach has three key components:

  1. Characterizing Real Users: The researchers used data from existing social networks to create models that accurately represent the characteristics and behaviors of real users.

  2. Diversifying Interactions: The team then employed evolutionary computation techniques to generate a diverse range of user interactions across multiple features of the social network.

  3. Collecting Performance Data: As these simulated user interactions were executed, the researchers collected performance data to identify bugs, glitches, and other issues that could impact the reliability and security of the social network.

By implementing this Socialz approach, the researchers were able to uncover a known limitation in the current GitLab CE system, as well as 6,907 additional errors, of which 40.16% were beyond their debugging capabilities.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a compelling case for the need to improve fuzz testing methods for online social networks. The Socialz approach appears to be a step in the right direction, as it aims to make these powerful testing tools more accessible to a wider range of programmers.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations in the current implementation. The researchers noted that a significant portion of the identified errors (40.16%) were beyond their ability to debug, suggesting that further work is needed to improve the analysis and interpretation of the results.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the specific nature of the errors or the potential impact they could have on real-world social network users. Further research is needed to better understand the severity and implications of the identified issues.

Overall, the Socialz approach is a promising step towards improving the reliability and security of online social networks. However, continued development and thorough testing will be necessary to ensure that these tools are effective in identifying and mitigating the full range of potential issues.

Conclusion

The widespread use of online social networks has made them an integral part of our daily lives, but these platforms are not immune to bugs and glitches. The Socialz approach presented in this paper aims to address this challenge by making fuzz testing more accessible to a broader range of programmers.

By characterizing real user behavior, diversifying interactions, and collecting performance data, Socialz has the potential to uncover a wide range of issues that could impact the reliability and security of social networks. While the current implementation has some limitations, the overall approach represents an important step towards improving the quality and trustworthiness of the online platforms we rely on every day.

As social networks continue to play a central role in our lives, ensuring their stability and security will only become more critical. The insights and techniques developed through Socialz can contribute to this effort, helping to create more robust and trustworthy social networking experiences for users worldwide.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

๐Ÿงช

Total Score

0

Socialz: Multi-Feature Social Fuzz Testing

Francisco Zanartu, Christoph Treude, Markus Wagner

Online social networks have become an integral aspect of our daily lives and play a crucial role in shaping our relationships with others. However, bugs and glitches, even minor ones, can cause anything from frustrating problems to serious data leaks that can have farreaching impacts on millions of users. To mitigate these risks, fuzz testing, a method of testing with randomised inputs, can provide increased confidence in the correct functioning of a social network. However, implementing traditional fuzz testing methods can be prohibitively difficult or impractical for programmers outside of the social network's development team. To tackle this challenge, we present Socialz, a novel approach to social fuzz testing that (1) characterises real users of a social network, (2) diversifies their interaction using evolutionary computation across multiple, non-trivial features, and (3) collects performance data as these interactions are executed. With Socialz, we aim to put social testing tools in everybody's hands, thereby improving the reliability and security of social networks used worldwide. In our study, we came across (1) one known limitation of the current GitLab CE and (2) 6,907 errors, of which 40.16% are beyond our debugging skills.

Read more

7/8/2024

FuzzTheREST: An Intelligent Automated Black-box RESTful API Fuzzer
Total Score

0

FuzzTheREST: An Intelligent Automated Black-box RESTful API Fuzzer

Tiago Dias, Eva Maia, Isabel Prac{c}a

Software's pervasive impact and increasing reliance in the era of digital transformation raise concerns about vulnerabilities, emphasizing the need for software security. Fuzzy testing is a dynamic analysis software testing technique that consists of feeding faulty input data to a System Under Test (SUT) and observing its behavior. Specifically regarding black-box RESTful API testing, recent literature has attempted to automate this technique using heuristics to perform the input search and using the HTTP response status codes for classification. However, most approaches do not keep track of code coverage, which is important to validate the solution. This work introduces a black-box RESTful API fuzzy testing tool that employs Reinforcement Learning (RL) for vulnerability detection. The fuzzer operates via the OpenAPI Specification (OAS) file and a scenarios file, which includes information to communicate with the SUT and the sequences of functionalities to test, respectively. To evaluate its effectiveness, the tool was tested on the Petstore API. The tool found a total of six unique vulnerabilities and achieved 55% code coverage.

Read more

7/22/2024

Exploring Fuzzing as Data Augmentation for Neural Test Generation
Total Score

0

Exploring Fuzzing as Data Augmentation for Neural Test Generation

Yifeng He, Jicheng Wang, Yuyang Rong, Hao Chen

Testing is essential to modern software engineering for building reliable software. Given the high costs of manually creating test cases, automated test case generation, particularly methods utilizing large language models, has become increasingly popular. These neural approaches generate semantically meaningful tests that are more maintainable compared with traditional automatic testing methods like fuzzing. However, the diversity and volume of unit tests in current datasets are limited. In this paper, we introduce a novel data augmentation technique, *FuzzAug*, that introduces the benefits of fuzzing to large language models to preserve valid program semantics and provide diverse inputs. This enhances the model's ability to embed correct inputs that can explore more branches of the function under test. Our evaluations show that models trained with dataset augmented by FuzzAug increase assertion accuracy by 5%, improve compilation rate by more than 10%, and generate unit test functions with 5% more branch coverage. This technique demonstrates the potential of using dynamic software testing to improve neural test generation, offering significant enhancements in neural test generation.

Read more

9/17/2024

๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ

Total Score

0

HIFuzz: Human Interaction Fuzzing for small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Theodore Chambers, Michael Vierhauser, Ankit Agrawal, Michael Murphy, Jason Matthew Brauer, Salil Purandare, Myra B. Cohen, Jane Cleland-Huang

Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) must meet rigorous safety standards when deployed in high-stress emergency response scenarios; however many reported accidents have involved humans in the loop. In this paper, we, therefore, present the HiFuzz testing framework, which uses fuzz testing to identify system vulnerabilities associated with human interactions. HiFuzz includes three distinct levels that progress from a low-cost, limited-fidelity, large-scale, no-hazard environment, using fully simulated Proxy Human Agents, via an intermediate level, where proxy humans are replaced with real humans, to a high-stakes, high-cost, real-world environment. Through applying HiFuzz to an autonomous multi-sUAS system-under-test, we show that each test level serves a unique purpose in revealing vulnerabilities and making the system more robust with respect to human mistakes. While HiFuzz is designed for testing sUAS systems, we further discuss its potential for use in other Cyber-Physical Systems.

Read more

4/9/2024