StructEval: Deepen and Broaden Large Language Model Assessment via Structured Evaluation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a structured evaluation framework for assessing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
- Aims to deepen and broaden the assessment of LLMs beyond standard metrics
- Introduces a modular benchmark called \M that evaluates LLMs across diverse tasks and areas
Plain English Explanation
The paper outlines a new approach for evaluating the capabilities of large language models. Rather than relying solely on standard performance metrics, the researchers have developed a more comprehensive and structured evaluation framework called \M.
\M assesses LLMs across a wide range of tasks and areas, going beyond the typical language understanding and generation tests. This allows for a deeper and more nuanced understanding of an LLM's strengths, weaknesses, and overall capabilities.
The key idea is to move beyond simplistic benchmarks and instead evaluate LLMs on their ability to demonstrate multi-level scientific knowledge and apply that knowledge to solve complex, real-world problems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a modular benchmark called \M that aims to evaluate large language models in a more structured and comprehensive way. \M consists of several components:
- Task Evaluation: Assesses the LLM's performance on a diverse set of tasks, including language understanding, reasoning, and multi-step problem-solving.
- Knowledge Evaluation: Examines the LLM's factual knowledge, as well as its ability to apply that knowledge to solve problems.
- Robustness Evaluation: Tests the LLM's stability and consistency under various perturbations, such as input noise or distribution shifts.
The researchers describe the design and implementation of these components in detail, along with the insights gained from applying \M to evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges some limitations of the \M framework, such as the difficulty in comprehensively covering the vast space of possible tasks and knowledge domains. The authors also note the challenge of ensuring the trustworthiness and efficiency of the evaluation process.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases and ethical considerations that may arise from the specific design choices or task selection within the \M framework.
Further research could explore ways to continuously expand and update the \M benchmark to keep pace with the rapidly evolving field of large language models.
Conclusion
The \M framework presented in this paper represents a significant step forward in the assessment of large language models. By moving beyond simplistic performance metrics and evaluating LLMs across a broader range of tasks and knowledge areas, the researchers have laid the groundwork for a more comprehensive and insightful evaluation process.
This work has the potential to inform the development of more capable and well-rounded language models, ultimately leading to more trustworthy and beneficial AI systems. However, continued research and critical analysis will be necessary to address the limitations and expand the scope of this structured evaluation approach.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
StructEval: Deepen and Broaden Large Language Model Assessment via Structured Evaluation
Boxi Cao, Mengjie Ren, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Feng Zhang, Junfeng Zhan, Le Sun
Evaluation is the baton for the development of large language models. Current evaluations typically employ a single-item assessment paradigm for each atomic test objective, which struggles to discern whether a model genuinely possesses the required capabilities or merely memorizes/guesses the answers to specific questions. To this end, we propose a novel evaluation framework referred to as StructEval. Starting from an atomic test objective, StructEval deepens and broadens the evaluation by conducting a structured assessment across multiple cognitive levels and critical concepts, and therefore offers a comprehensive, robust and consistent evaluation for LLMs. Experiments on three widely-used benchmarks demonstrate that StructEval serves as a reliable tool for resisting the risk of data contamination and reducing the interference of potential biases, thereby providing more reliable and consistent conclusions regarding model capabilities. Our framework also sheds light on the design of future principled and trustworthy LLM evaluation protocols.
Read more8/9/2024
0
StructBench: An Autogenerated Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Model's Ability in Structure-Rich Text Understanding
Zhouhong Gu, Haoning Ye, Zeyang Zhou, Hongwei Feng, Yanghua Xiao
Given the substantial volumes of structured data held by many companies, enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to directly understand structured text in non-structured forms could significantly enhance their capabilities across various business scenarios. To this end, we propose evaluation data generation method for assessing LLM's ability in understanding the structure-rich text, which generates structured data of controllable complexity based on manually crafted question templates and generation rules. Building on this generation method, we introduce StrucText-Eval, a benchmark comprising 6,032 questions across 8 different structured languages and 29 specific tasks. Furthermore, considering human proficiency in rule-based tasks, we also present StrucText-Eval-Hard, which includes 3,016 questions designed to further examine the gap between LLMs and human performance. Results indicate that the best-performing LLM currently achieve an accuracy of 65.0% on StrucText-Eval-Hard, while human accuracy reaches up to 95.7%. Moreover, while fine-tuning using StrucText-Eval can enhance existing LLMs' understanding of all structured languages, it does not necessarily improve performance across all task types. The benchmark and generation codes are open sourced in https://github.com/MikeGu721/StrucText-Eval
Read more7/2/2024
🎯
0
F-Eval: Assessing Fundamental Abilities with Refined Evaluation Methods
Yu Sun, Keyu Chen, Shujie Wang, Peiji Li, Qipeng Guo, Hang Yan, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang, Dahua Lin
Large language models (LLMs) garner significant attention for their unprecedented performance, leading to an increasing number of researches evaluating LLMs. However, these evaluation benchmarks are limited to assessing the instruction-following capabilities, overlooking the fundamental abilities that emerge during the pre-training stage. Previous subjective evaluation methods mainly reply on scoring by API models. However, in the absence of references, large models have shown limited ability to discern subtle differences. To bridge the gap, we propose F-Eval, a bilingual evaluation benchmark to evaluate the fundamental abilities, including expression, commonsense and logic. The tasks in F-Eval include multi-choice objective tasks, open-ended objective tasks, reference-based subjective tasks and reference-free subjective tasks. For reference-free subjective tasks, we devise new evaluation methods, serving as alternatives to scoring by API models. We conduct evaluations on 13 advanced LLMs. Results show that our evaluation methods show higher correlation coefficients and larger distinction than other evaluators. Additionally, we discuss the influence of different model sizes, dimensions, and normalization methods. We anticipate that F-Eval will facilitate the study of LLMs' fundamental abilities.
Read more8/21/2024
0
What is the best model? Application-driven Evaluation for Large Language Models
Shiguo Lian, Kaikai Zhao, Xinhui Liu, Xuejiao Lei, Bikun Yang, Wenjing Zhang, Kai Wang, Zhaoxiang Liu
General large language models enhanced with supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback are increasingly popular in academia and industry as they generalize foundation models to various practical tasks in a prompt manner. To assist users in selecting the best model in practical application scenarios, i.e., choosing the model that meets the application requirements while minimizing cost, we introduce A-Eval, an application-driven LLMs evaluation benchmark for general large language models. First, we categorize evaluation tasks into five main categories and 27 sub-categories from a practical application perspective. Next, we construct a dataset comprising 678 question-and-answer pairs through a process of collecting, annotating, and reviewing. Then, we design an objective and effective evaluation method and evaluate a series of LLMs of different scales on A-Eval. Finally, we reveal interesting laws regarding model scale and task difficulty level and propose a feasible method for selecting the best model. Through A-Eval, we provide clear empirical and engineer guidance for selecting the best model, reducing barriers to selecting and using LLMs and promoting their application and development. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/UnicomAI/DataSet/tree/main/TestData/GeneralAbility.
Read more6/18/2024