Systematic Evaluation of Synthetic Data Augmentation for Multi-class NetFlow Traffic

Read original: arXiv:2408.16034 - Published 8/30/2024 by Maximilian Wolf, Dieter Landes, Andreas Hotho, Daniel Schlor
Total Score

0

Systematic Evaluation of Synthetic Data Augmentation for Multi-class NetFlow Traffic

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers systematically evaluated the use of synthetic data augmentation techniques to improve multi-class network traffic classification
  • Experiment involved generating synthetic network traffic data using generative models and evaluating the impact on intrusion detection performance
  • Findings suggest synthetic data can significantly boost classification accuracy, especially for minority classes in imbalanced datasets

Plain English Explanation

Researchers looked at how to improve machine learning models that classify different types of network traffic. Often, datasets used to train these models are imbalanced, meaning some traffic types are underrepresented.

To address this, the researchers generated synthetic network traffic data using machine learning models. They then used this synthetic data to augment the original training dataset and evaluated how well the resulting models could classify different types of network traffic, including potential cyber attacks.

The key finding was that adding the synthetic data significantly improved the models' ability to accurately identify different traffic types, especially the rarer or "minority" classes that were underrepresented in the original dataset. This suggests that synthetic data augmentation could be a powerful technique for enhancing the performance of network traffic classification systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a systematic evaluation of using synthetic data augmentation techniques to improve multi-class network traffic classification. They generated synthetic network traffic data using generative adversarial networks (GANs) and other models, then incorporated this synthetic data into the training process for intrusion detection classifiers.

The experiment design involved several steps:

  1. Collecting a real-world network traffic dataset with imbalanced classes representing different traffic types and attack scenarios
  2. Developing GAN-based and other generative models to synthesize new network traffic samples
  3. Augmenting the original training data with varying proportions of synthetic samples
  4. Training multi-class classifiers on the augmented datasets and evaluating their performance on held-out test data

The results showed that incorporating synthetic data led to significant improvements in classification accuracy, especially for minority traffic classes that were underrepresented in the original dataset. The best-performing models leveraged a combination of real and synthetic training samples.

The researchers also analyzed the characteristics of the generated synthetic data and its impact on model behavior. They found the synthetic samples helped the classifiers learn more robust feature representations and decision boundaries.

Critical Analysis

The study provides a systematic and rigorous evaluation of synthetic data augmentation for network traffic classification, an important problem in cybersecurity. The researchers considered multiple generative modeling approaches and analyzed the tradeoffs in depth.

However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

  • The evaluation was conducted on a single dataset, so the generalizability to other network traffic scenarios is unclear
  • The authors did not investigate the impact of syntheticdata quality on model performance, which could be an important factor
  • While the synthetic data boosted minority class performance, it's unclear if it would have the same benefits for extremely imbalanced or rare traffic types

Additionally, real-world deployment of such augmented models would require careful monitoring and retraining to ensure they maintain performance over time as traffic patterns evolve.

Overall, this research makes a valuable contribution, but there are still open questions and opportunities to build on these findings through further investigation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the promise of synthetic data augmentation for enhancing the performance of network traffic classification models, particularly in addressing class imbalance issues. By leveraging generated samples to supplement real training data, the researchers were able to significantly improve the models' ability to accurately identify different types of network traffic, including potential cyber attacks.

These results suggest synthetic data could be a powerful tool for improving the robustness and generalization of intrusion detection systems. As network traffic becomes increasingly complex and diverse, techniques like this may be essential for developing reliable, high-performance classification models to protect against evolving cyber threats.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Systematic Evaluation of Synthetic Data Augmentation for Multi-class NetFlow Traffic
Total Score

0

Systematic Evaluation of Synthetic Data Augmentation for Multi-class NetFlow Traffic

Maximilian Wolf, Dieter Landes, Andreas Hotho, Daniel Schlor

The detection of cyber-attacks in computer networks is a crucial and ongoing research challenge. Machine learning-based attack classification offers a promising solution, as these models can be continuously updated with new data, enhancing the effectiveness of network intrusion detection systems (NIDS). Unlike binary classification models that simply indicate the presence of an attack, multi-class models can identify specific types of attacks, allowing for more targeted and effective incident responses. However, a significant drawback of these classification models is their sensitivity to imbalanced training data. Recent advances suggest that generative models can assist in data augmentation, claiming to offer superior solutions for imbalanced datasets. Classical balancing methods, although less novel, also provide potential remedies for this issue. Despite these claims, a comprehensive comparison of these methods within the NIDS domain is lacking. Most existing studies focus narrowly on individual methods, making it difficult to compare results due to varying experimental setups. To close this gap, we designed a systematic framework to compare classical and generative resampling methods for class balancing across multiple popular classification models in the NIDS domain, evaluated on several NIDS benchmark datasets. Our experiments indicate that resampling methods for balancing training data do not reliably improve classification performance. Although some instances show performance improvements, the majority of results indicate decreased performance, with no consistent trend in favor of a specific resampling technique enhancing a particular classifier.

Read more

8/30/2024

Feedback-guided Data Synthesis for Imbalanced Classification
Total Score

0

Feedback-guided Data Synthesis for Imbalanced Classification

Reyhane Askari Hemmat, Mohammad Pezeshki, Florian Bordes, Michal Drozdzal, Adriana Romero-Soriano

Current status quo in machine learning is to use static datasets of real images for training, which often come from long-tailed distributions. With the recent advances in generative models, researchers have started augmenting these static datasets with synthetic data, reporting moderate performance improvements on classification tasks. We hypothesize that these performance gains are limited by the lack of feedback from the classifier to the generative model, which would promote the usefulness of the generated samples to improve the classifier's performance. In this work, we introduce a framework for augmenting static datasets with useful synthetic samples, which leverages one-shot feedback from the classifier to drive the sampling of the generative model. In order for the framework to be effective, we find that the samples must be close to the support of the real data of the task at hand, and be sufficiently diverse. We validate three feedback criteria on a long-tailed dataset (ImageNet-LT) as well as a group-imbalanced dataset (NICO++). On ImageNet-LT, we achieve state-of-the-art results, with over 4 percent improvement on underrepresented classes while being twice efficient in terms of the number of generated synthetic samples. NICO++ also enjoys marked boosts of over 5 percent in worst group accuracy. With these results, our framework paves the path towards effectively leveraging state-of-the-art text-to-image models as data sources that can be queried to improve downstream applications.

Read more

9/11/2024

📊

Total Score

0

SYNAuG: Exploiting Synthetic Data for Data Imbalance Problems

Moon Ye-Bin, Nam Hyeon-Woo, Wonseok Choi, Nayeong Kim, Suha Kwak, Tae-Hyun Oh

Data imbalance in training data often leads to biased predictions from trained models, which in turn causes ethical and social issues. A straightforward solution is to carefully curate training data, but given the enormous scale of modern neural networks, this is prohibitively labor-intensive and thus impractical. Inspired by recent developments in generative models, this paper explores the potential of synthetic data to address the data imbalance problem. To be specific, our method, dubbed SYNAuG, leverages synthetic data to equalize the unbalanced distribution of training data. Our experiments demonstrate that, although a domain gap between real and synthetic data exists, training with SYNAuG followed by fine-tuning with a few real samples allows to achieve impressive performance on diverse tasks with different data imbalance issues, surpassing existing task-specific methods for the same purpose.

Read more

4/26/2024

Mitigating Data Imbalance for Software Vulnerability Assessment: Does Data Augmentation Help?
Total Score

0

Mitigating Data Imbalance for Software Vulnerability Assessment: Does Data Augmentation Help?

Triet H. M. Le, M. Ali Babar

Background: Software Vulnerability (SV) assessment is increasingly adopted to address the ever-increasing volume and complexity of SVs. Data-driven approaches have been widely used to automate SV assessment tasks, particularly the prediction of the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) metrics such as exploitability, impact, and severity. SV assessment suffers from the imbalanced distributions of the CVSS classes, but such data imbalance has been hardly understood and addressed in the literature. Aims: We conduct a large-scale study to quantify the impacts of data imbalance and mitigate the issue for SV assessment through the use of data augmentation. Method: We leverage nine data augmentation techniques to balance the class distributions of the CVSS metrics. We then compare the performance of SV assessment models with and without leveraging the augmented data. Results: Through extensive experiments on 180k+ real-world SVs, we show that mitigating data imbalance can significantly improve the predictive performance of models for all the CVSS tasks, by up to 31.8% in Matthews Correlation Coefficient. We also discover that simple text augmentation like combining random text insertion, deletion, and replacement can outperform the baseline across the board. Conclusions: Our study provides the motivation and the first promising step toward tackling data imbalance for effective SV assessment.

Read more

7/16/2024