Testing learning-enabled cyber-physical systems with Large-Language Models: A Formal Approach
2311.07377
0
0
๐งช
Abstract
The integration of machine learning (ML) into cyber-physical systems (CPS) offers significant benefits, including enhanced efficiency, predictive capabilities, real-time responsiveness, and the enabling of autonomous operations. This convergence has accelerated the development and deployment of a range of real-world applications, such as autonomous vehicles, delivery drones, service robots, and telemedicine procedures. However, the software development life cycle (SDLC) for AI-infused CPS diverges significantly from traditional approaches, featuring data and learning as two critical components. Existing verification and validation techniques are often inadequate for these new paradigms. In this study, we pinpoint the main challenges in ensuring formal safety for learningenabled CPS.We begin by examining testing as the most pragmatic method for verification and validation, summarizing the current state-of-the-art methodologies. Recognizing the limitations in current testing approaches to provide formal safety guarantees, we propose a roadmap to transition from foundational probabilistic testing to a more rigorous approach capable of delivering formal assurance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Machine learning (ML) integration into cyber-physical systems (CPS) offers benefits like enhanced efficiency, predictive capabilities, real-time responsiveness, and autonomous operations.
- This convergence has accelerated the development of real-world applications like autonomous vehicles, delivery drones, service robots, and telemedicine.
- However, the software development life cycle (SDLC) for AI-infused CPS differs significantly from traditional approaches, with data and learning as critical components.
- Existing verification and validation techniques are often inadequate for these new paradigms, posing challenges in ensuring formal safety.
Plain English Explanation
Integrating machine learning into cyber-physical systems, like self-driving cars or delivery drones, can bring significant benefits. It can make these systems more efficient, better at predicting what will happen, able to respond in real-time, and even capable of operating autonomously without human intervention.
This combination of machine learning and cyber-physical systems has led to the rapid development of many real-world applications that we're starting to see in our daily lives. Examples include self-driving cars, delivery drones that can transport packages, service robots that can assist people, and remote medical procedures (telemedicine).
However, the process of developing these AI-powered cyber-physical systems is quite different from how traditional software is built. Data and the ability to learn from that data are critical components, rather than just following a pre-determined set of instructions.
This poses challenges for verifying and validating the safety of these systems. The common testing methods used for traditional software often aren't adequate when you've got a system that can learn and adapt over time. Researchers are now working to develop new approaches that can provide stronger guarantees about the safety of these AI-infused cyber-physical systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the key challenges in ensuring formal safety for learning-enabled cyber-physical systems (CPS). It starts by recognizing testing as the most pragmatic method for verification and validation, and summarizes the current state-of-the-art methodologies.
However, the authors acknowledge the limitations of current testing approaches in providing formal safety guarantees for these new AI-infused CPS paradigms. To address this, the paper proposes a roadmap to transition from foundational probabilistic testing to a more rigorous approach capable of delivering formal assurance.
The core idea is to move beyond just testing the system under known conditions, and instead develop techniques that can reason about the system's behavior under a wider range of possible scenarios, including those the system has not been explicitly trained on. This could involve methods like generating probabilistic scenario programs from natural language or enhancing planning with physics-informed safety controllers.
By taking a more comprehensive and formal approach to verification and validation, the researchers aim to provide stronger safety assurances for these learning-enabled cyber-physical systems as they become increasingly prevalent in our daily lives.
Critical Analysis
The paper identifies a critical challenge in the transition from traditional software development to AI-infused cyber-physical systems. While testing remains a pragmatic approach, the authors acknowledge its limitations in providing formal safety guarantees for these new paradigms.
The proposed roadmap to move towards more rigorous verification and validation techniques is a promising direction. Approaches that can reason about a wider range of possible scenarios, rather than just testing known conditions, could lead to stronger safety assurances. However, developing such comprehensive techniques may prove technically demanding and computationally intensive.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential trade-offs or practical challenges in deploying these advanced verification methods. Real-world deployment may involve balancing safety, performance, and cost considerations, which could introduce further complexities.
Further research is needed to fully address the long-term implications and societal impact of these learning-enabled cyber-physical systems. Issues around transparency, accountability, and the ethical use of such technologies will also require careful consideration as they become more prevalent.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the significant challenges in ensuring formal safety for cyber-physical systems that integrate machine learning. While the benefits of enhanced efficiency, predictive capabilities, and autonomous operations are clear, the software development life cycle for these AI-infused systems diverges significantly from traditional approaches.
The authors propose a roadmap to transition from foundational probabilistic testing to more rigorous verification and validation techniques. This could involve methods like generating probabilistic scenario programs from natural language or enhancing planning with physics-informed safety controllers.
By taking a comprehensive and formal approach to safety assurance, researchers aim to provide stronger guarantees as these learning-enabled cyber-physical systems become increasingly prevalent in our daily lives, from autonomous vehicles to delivery drones and beyond. However, further research is needed to address the practical challenges and long-term implications of this rapidly evolving field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
CPS-LLM: Large Language Model based Safe Usage Plan Generator for Human-in-the-Loop Human-in-the-Plant Cyber-Physical System
Ayan Banerjee, Aranyak Maity, Payal Kamboj, Sandeep K. S. Gupta
0
0
We explore the usage of large language models (LLM) in human-in-the-loop human-in-the-plant cyber-physical systems (CPS) to translate a high-level prompt into a personalized plan of actions, and subsequently convert that plan into a grounded inference of sequential decision-making automated by a real-world CPS controller to achieve a control goal. We show that it is relatively straightforward to contextualize an LLM so it can generate domain-specific plans. However, these plans may be infeasible for the physical system to execute or the plan may be unsafe for human users. To address this, we propose CPS-LLM, an LLM retrained using an instruction tuning framework, which ensures that generated plans not only align with the physical system dynamics of the CPS but are also safe for human users. The CPS-LLM consists of two innovative components: a) a liquid time constant neural network-based physical dynamics coefficient estimator that can derive coefficients of dynamical models with some unmeasured state variables; b) the model coefficients are then used to train an LLM with prompts embodied with traces from the dynamical system and the corresponding model coefficients. We show that when the CPS-LLM is integrated with a contextualized chatbot such as BARD it can generate feasible and safe plans to manage external events such as meals for automated insulin delivery systems used by Type 1 Diabetes subjects.
5/21/2024
๐
Verified Safe Reinforcement Learning for Neural Network Dynamic Models
Junlin Wu, Huan Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
0
0
Learning reliably safe autonomous control is one of the core problems in trustworthy autonomy. However, training a controller that can be formally verified to be safe remains a major challenge. We introduce a novel approach for learning verified safe control policies in nonlinear neural dynamical systems while maximizing overall performance. Our approach aims to achieve safety in the sense of finite-horizon reachability proofs, and is comprised of three key parts. The first is a novel curriculum learning scheme that iteratively increases the verified safe horizon. The second leverages the iterative nature of gradient-based learning to leverage incremental verification, reusing information from prior verification runs. Finally, we learn multiple verified initial-state-dependent controllers, an idea that is especially valuable for more complex domains where learning a single universal verified safe controller is extremely challenging. Our experiments on five safe control problems demonstrate that our trained controllers can achieve verified safety over horizons that are as much as an order of magnitude longer than state-of-the-art baselines, while maintaining high reward, as well as a perfect safety record over entire episodes.
5/28/2024
Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Review of Integration Challenges for Industrial Systems
Alexander Windmann, Philipp Wittenberg, Marvin Schieseck, Oliver Niggemann
0
0
In Industry 4.0, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) generate vast data sets that can be leveraged by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for applications including predictive maintenance and production planning. However, despite the demonstrated potential of AI, its widespread adoption in sectors like manufacturing remains limited. Our comprehensive review of recent literature, including standards and reports, pinpoints key challenges: system integration, data-related issues, managing workforce-related concerns and ensuring trustworthy AI. A quantitative analysis highlights particular challenges and topics that are important for practitioners but still need to be sufficiently investigated by academics. The paper briefly discusses existing solutions to these challenges and proposes avenues for future research. We hope that this survey serves as a resource for practitioners evaluating the cost-benefit implications of AI in CPS and for researchers aiming to address these urgent challenges.
5/30/2024
Building Hybrid B-Spline And Neural Network Operators
Raffaele Romagnoli, Jasmine Ratchford, Mark H. Klein
0
0
Control systems are indispensable for ensuring the safety of cyber-physical systems (CPS), spanning various domains such as automobiles, airplanes, and missiles. Safeguarding CPS necessitates runtime methodologies that continuously monitor safety-critical conditions and respond in a verifiably safe manner. A fundamental aspect of many safety approaches involves predicting the future behavior of systems. However, achieving this requires accurate models that can operate in real time. Motivated by DeepONets, we propose a novel strategy that combines the inductive bias of B-splines with data-driven neural networks to facilitate real-time predictions of CPS behavior. We introduce our hybrid B-spline neural operator, establishing its capability as a universal approximator and providing rigorous bounds on the approximation error. These findings are applicable to a broad class of nonlinear autonomous systems and are validated through experimentation on a controlled 6-degree-of-freedom (DOF) quadrotor with a 12 dimensional state space. Furthermore, we conduct a comparative analysis of different network architectures, specifically fully connected networks (FCNN) and recurrent neural networks (RNN), to elucidate the practical utility and trade-offs associated with each architecture in real-world scenarios.
6/12/2024