Timer: Generative Pre-trained Transformers Are Large Time Series Models
2402.02368
0
0
Abstract
Deep learning has contributed remarkably to the advancement of time series analysis. Still, deep models can encounter performance bottlenecks in real-world data-scarce scenarios, which can be concealed due to the performance saturation with small models on current benchmarks. Meanwhile, large models have demonstrated great powers in these scenarios through large-scale pre-training. Continuous progress has been achieved with the emergence of large language models, exhibiting unprecedented abilities such as few-shot generalization, scalability, and task generality, which are however absent in small deep models. To change the status quo of training scenario-specific small models from scratch, this paper aims at the early development of large time series models (LTSM). During pre-training, we curate large-scale datasets with up to 1 billion time points, unify heterogeneous time series into single-series sequence (S3) format, and develop the GPT-style architecture toward LTSMs. To meet diverse application needs, we convert forecasting, imputation, and anomaly detection of time series into a unified generative task. The outcome of this study is a Time Series Transformer (Timer), which is generative pre-trained by next token prediction and adapted to various downstream tasks with promising capabilities as an LTSM. Code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/thuml/Large-Time-Series-Model.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces Timer, a novel Transformer-based model for time series analysis at scale.
- Timer leverages self-supervised pre-training techniques to learn general representations from large datasets, which can then be fine-tuned for various time series tasks.
- The authors demonstrate Timer's strong performance on a range of benchmarks, including TimeSformer, TimeGPT, and UNITS.
Plain English Explanation
Timer is a new type of machine learning model that is designed to work with time series data, which is data that changes over time, like stock prices or weather patterns. The key idea behind Timer is that it can learn general patterns from large datasets of time series data, and then use that knowledge to solve specific time series tasks, like forecasting future values or detecting anomalies.
This is done through a process called self-supervised pre-training, where the model is trained on a large amount of unlabeled time series data to learn general representations of the data. Once this pre-training is complete, the model can then be fine-tuned on specific time series tasks, using a smaller amount of labeled data.
The authors show that this approach allows Timer to outperform other state-of-the-art time series models, like TimeSformer, TimeGPT, and UNITS, on a variety of benchmarks. This is an important advancement, as it allows for more accurate and efficient time series analysis, which has applications in fields like finance, meteorology, and industrial automation.
Technical Explanation
The core innovation of Timer is its use of Transformer-based architectures for time series analysis. Transformers, which were originally developed for natural language processing tasks, have shown great promise for modeling sequential data like time series.
The authors first pre-train Timer on a large dataset of time series data using self-supervised techniques. This allows the model to learn general representations of time series patterns, without requiring any labeled data. They explore several pre-training objectives, including masked time series prediction and contrastive learning.
Once pre-trained, Timer can then be fine-tuned on specific time series tasks, such as forecasting, anomaly detection, or change point detection. The authors demonstrate Timer's strong performance on a range of benchmarks, including the TimeSformer, TimeGPT, and UNITS datasets.
A key aspect of Timer's architecture is its ability to handle long-range dependencies in time series data, which can be challenging for traditional time series models. The Transformer's self-attention mechanism allows Timer to capture these long-range dependencies effectively.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations of their work. First, the pre-training process can be computationally intensive, which may limit the practical applicability of Timer, especially for smaller organizations or researchers with limited computational resources.
Additionally, the paper does not extensively explore the interpretability of Timer's internal representations and decision-making processes. As time series analysis is often used in high-stakes domains, such as finance or healthcare, the interpretability of models is an important consideration.
Further research could also explore the robustness of Timer to noisy or incomplete time series data, as well as its performance on a wider range of time series tasks and datasets. Comparisons to other recent advancements in time series modeling, such as the Tempo and Unified Transformers models, would also be valuable.
Conclusion
The Timer model introduced in this paper represents an exciting advance in time series analysis, leveraging the power of Transformer-based architectures and self-supervised pre-training to achieve state-of-the-art performance on a range of benchmarks. This work demonstrates the potential of data-centric AI approaches to unlock new capabilities in time series modeling, with applications in fields like finance, meteorology, and industrial automation.
While the paper highlights some limitations that warrant further exploration, the core ideas behind Timer – its Transformer-based architecture and self-supervised pre-training approach – are likely to have a significant impact on the future of time series analysis and time series forecasting at scale.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasters
Nate Gruver, Marc Finzi, Shikai Qiu, Andrew Gordon Wilson
0
0
By encoding time series as a string of numerical digits, we can frame time series forecasting as next-token prediction in text. Developing this approach, we find that large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3 and LLaMA-2 can surprisingly zero-shot extrapolate time series at a level comparable to or exceeding the performance of purpose-built time series models trained on the downstream tasks. To facilitate this performance, we propose procedures for effectively tokenizing time series data and converting discrete distributions over tokens into highly flexible densities over continuous values. We argue the success of LLMs for time series stems from their ability to naturally represent multimodal distributions, in conjunction with biases for simplicity, and repetition, which align with the salient features in many time series, such as repeated seasonal trends. We also show how LLMs can naturally handle missing data without imputation through non-numerical text, accommodate textual side information, and answer questions to help explain predictions. While we find that increasing model size generally improves performance on time series, we show GPT-4 can perform worse than GPT-3 because of how it tokenizes numbers, and poor uncertainty calibration, which is likely the result of alignment interventions such as RLHF.
6/19/2024
Understanding Different Design Choices in Training Large Time Series Models
Yu-Neng Chuang, Songchen Li, Jiayi Yuan, Guanchu Wang, Kwei-Herng Lai, Leisheng Yu, Sirui Ding, Chia-Yuan Chang, Qiaoyu Tan, Daochen Zha, Xia Hu
0
0
Inspired by Large Language Models (LLMs), Time Series Forecasting (TSF), a long-standing task in time series analysis, is undergoing a transition towards Large Time Series Models (LTSMs), aiming to train universal transformer-based models for TSF. However, training LTSMs on heterogeneous time series data poses unique challenges, including diverse frequencies, dimensions, and patterns across datasets. Recent endeavors have studied and evaluated various design choices aimed at enhancing LTSM training and generalization capabilities, spanning pre-processing techniques, model configurations, and dataset configurations. In this work, we comprehensively analyze these design choices and aim to identify the best practices for training LTSM. Moreover, we propose emph{time series prompt}, a novel statistical prompting strategy tailored to time series data. Furthermore, based on the observations in our analysis, we introduce texttt{LTSM-bundle}, which bundles the best design choices we have identified. Empirical results demonstrate that texttt{LTSM-bundle} achieves superior zero-shot and few-shot performances compared to state-of-the-art LSTMs and traditional TSF methods on benchmark datasets.
6/21/2024
🛸
TEMPO: Prompt-based Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Time Series Forecasting
Defu Cao, Furong Jia, Sercan O Arik, Tomas Pfister, Yixiang Zheng, Wen Ye, Yan Liu
0
0
The past decade has witnessed significant advances in time series modeling with deep learning. While achieving state-of-the-art results, the best-performing architectures vary highly across applications and domains. Meanwhile, for natural language processing, the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) has demonstrated impressive performance via training one general-purpose model across various textual datasets. It is intriguing to explore whether GPT-type architectures can be effective for time series, capturing the intrinsic dynamic attributes and leading to significant accuracy improvements. In this paper, we propose a novel framework, TEMPO, that can effectively learn time series representations. We focus on utilizing two essential inductive biases of the time series task for pre-trained models: (i) decomposition of the complex interaction between trend, seasonal and residual components; and (ii) introducing the design of prompts to facilitate distribution adaptation in different types of time series. TEMPO expands the capability for dynamically modeling real-world temporal phenomena from data within diverse domains. Our experiments demonstrate the superior performance of TEMPO over state-of-the-art methods on zero shot setting for a number of time series benchmark datasets. This performance gain is observed not only in scenarios involving previously unseen datasets but also in scenarios with multi-modal inputs. This compelling finding highlights TEMPO's potential to constitute a foundational model-building framework.
4/3/2024
📈
TimeGPT in Load Forecasting: A Large Time Series Model Perspective
Wenlong Liao, Fernando Porte-Agel, Jiannong Fang, Christian Rehtanz, Shouxiang Wang, Dechang Yang, Zhe Yang
0
0
Machine learning models have made significant progress in load forecasting, but their forecast accuracy is limited in cases where historical load data is scarce. Inspired by the outstanding performance of large language models (LLMs) in computer vision and natural language processing, this paper aims to discuss the potential of large time series models in load forecasting with scarce historical data. Specifically, the large time series model is constructed as a time series generative pre-trained transformer (TimeGPT), which is trained on massive and diverse time series datasets consisting of 100 billion data points (e.g., finance, transportation, banking, web traffic, weather, energy, healthcare, etc.). Then, the scarce historical load data is used to fine-tune the TimeGPT, which helps it to adapt to the data distribution and characteristics associated with load forecasting. Simulation results show that TimeGPT outperforms the benchmarks (e.g., popular machine learning models and statistical models) for load forecasting on several real datasets with scarce training samples, particularly for short look-ahead times. However, it cannot be guaranteed that TimeGPT is always superior to benchmarks for load forecasting with scarce data, since the performance of TimeGPT may be affected by the distribution differences between the load data and the training data. In practical applications, we can divide the historical data into a training set and a validation set, and then use the validation set loss to decide whether TimeGPT is the best choice for a specific dataset.
4/9/2024