Towards Generalised Pre-Training of Graph Models

Overview

• Unsupervised representation learning can help when data or labels are scarce
• Existing graph representation learning approaches are domain-specific
• This work presents a new method called Topology Only Pre-Training (ToP) that can transfer across domains

Plain English Explanation

Unsupervised representation learning is a powerful technique where a machine learning model is first trained on a large, unlabeled dataset. This pre-trained model can then be "fine-tuned" on a smaller, labeled dataset relevant to the task at hand. This is useful when you don't have much labeled data available.

Previous methods for learning representations of graph-structured data, like social networks or molecular structures, were limited to a specific domain. The node and edge features in the pre-training data had to be similar to the target data for the model to work well.

The new Topology Only Pre-Training (ToP) method gets around this limitation. It separates the process of learning the graph topology (the connections between nodes) from learning the node and edge features. By pre-training the model only on the graph topology, across multiple domains, it can then be applied to a wide variety of target datasets, even if the node and edge features are very different.

The results show that these ToP models outperform other approaches, especially when the target data has different features than the pre-training data. This suggests that the general patterns in graph topology can be more useful for transfer learning than domain-specific features.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this work is the Topology Only Pre-Training (ToP) method. Typically, graph representation learning approaches learn both the graph topology (connections between nodes) and the node/edge features in a single step. ToP separates this into two stages:

1. Pre-training on the graph topology alone, using contrastive learning to learn topological representations.
2. Fine-tuning on the target dataset, which may have very different node and edge features.

This allows the pre-trained model to transfer effectively to multiple domains, even when the target data has different characteristics than the pre-training data.

The experiments show that ToP models perform significantly better than supervised baselines on 75% of evaluation tasks. When node and edge features are used, ToP outperforms single-domain or non-pre-trained models on 85.7% of tasks.

Interestingly, the results also indicate that pre-training on topologies from unrelated domains can sometimes be more beneficial than pre-training on topologies from the target domain. For example, pre-training on non-molecular graphs led to better transfer on molecular benchmarks compared to pre-training on molecular graphs.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling approach to enable cross-domain transfer learning for graph-structured data. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

• The experiments focus on relatively small, curated datasets. It's unclear how well the ToP method would scale to larger, noisier real-world graphs.
• The paper does not explore the limits of how different the pre-training and target domains can be before performance degrades. More research is needed to understand the boundaries of effective cross-domain transfer.
• The analysis of why out-of-domain topologies can sometimes be more useful is rather limited. Further investigation into the influence of graph topology on learning could provide deeper insights.

Overall, the ToP method represents an important step towards more flexible and generalizable graph representation learning. With further development, it could have significant impacts on a wide range of applications that rely on graph-structured data.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel pre-training approach for graph representation learning called Topology Only Pre-Training (ToP). By separating the learning of graph topology from node/edge features, ToP models can effectively transfer to target datasets across multiple domains, even when the features differ significantly from the pre-training data.

The results demonstrate the power of this approach, with ToP models outperforming supervised baselines and single-domain models in the majority of experiments. This suggests that the general patterns in graph topology can be more useful for transfer learning than domain-specific features.

While there are some limitations to explore, the ToP method represents an important advance in making graph representation learning more flexible and applicable to a wider range of real-world problems. As the field continues to evolve, techniques like this will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of graph-based machine learning.