Towards Measuring and Modeling Culture in LLMs: A Survey

2403.15412

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/21/2024 by Muhammad Farid Adilazuarda, Sagnik Mukherjee, Pradhyumna Lavania, Siddhant Singh, Alham Fikri Aji, Jacki O'Neill, Ashutosh Modi, Monojit Choudhury
Towards Measuring and Modeling Culture in LLMs: A Survey

Abstract

We present a survey of more than 90 recent papers that aim to study cultural representation and inclusion in large language models (LLMs). We observe that none of the studies explicitly define culture, which is a complex, multifaceted concept; instead, they probe the models on some specially designed datasets which represent certain aspects of culture. We call these aspects the proxies of culture, and organize them across two dimensions of demographic and semantic proxies. We also categorize the probing methods employed. Our analysis indicates that only certain aspects of ``culture,'' such as values and objectives, have been studied, leaving several other interesting and important facets, especially the multitude of semantic domains (Thompson et al., 2020) and aboutness (Hershcovich et al., 2022), unexplored. Two other crucial gaps are the lack of robustness of probing techniques and situated studies on the impact of cultural mis- and under-representation in LLM-based applications.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper is a survey on measuring and modeling "culture" in large language models (LLMs).
  • It explores how researchers have attempted to identify, understand, and address cultural biases and behaviors in LLMs.
  • The paper covers various approaches, including auditing large language models for enhanced text-based analysis, exploring the frontier of vision-language models, and challenging LLMs with specific tasks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the challenge of understanding and measuring the "culture" that emerges within large language models (LLMs) - the complex patterns of behavior, beliefs, and biases that can develop as these AI systems are trained on vast amounts of online data. Researchers have been exploring different ways to identify and analyze these cultural elements, such as auditing LLMs to detect biases in their language outputs, pushing the boundaries of what these models can do by combining language with other modalities like vision, and designing specialized tasks to challenge LLMs and reveal their underlying cultural assumptions. The goal is to better understand how culture emerges in these powerful AI systems and find ways to shape their behavior to be more inclusive and beneficial to society.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive survey of the research on measuring and modeling "culture" in large language models (LLMs). The authors first describe the methodology used to identify and categorize relevant papers, focusing on three main approaches:

  1. Auditing LLMs for biases and cultural representations in their language outputs
  2. Exploring the integration of language models with other modalities, such as vision, to expand their cultural understanding
  3. Designing specialized tasks and challenges to probe the cultural assumptions and behaviors embedded in LLMs

The paper then provides a detailed overview of the key findings and insights from the surveyed research, highlighting the various methods used to measure and model cultural elements in LLMs, such as probing for subjective global opinions and using interactive red teaming to uncover cultural biases. The authors also discuss the limitations and challenges of this emerging field of study.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched survey of the current state of research on measuring and modeling culture in large language models. It highlights the important work being done to understand the complex cultural dynamics that can emerge in these powerful AI systems. However, the paper also acknowledges the significant challenges and limitations of this research, such as the difficulty in defining and operationalizing the concept of "culture" in the context of LLMs.

One potential area for further research would be to explore the ethical implications of these cultural analyses and the ways in which they could be used to shape the development and deployment of LLMs. The paper touches on this briefly, but more in-depth discussion and critical analysis of the societal impacts would be valuable.

Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the specific methodological approaches and their relative strengths and weaknesses. A more nuanced evaluation of the different techniques used to measure and model culture in LLMs would help readers better understand the trade-offs and considerations involved.

Conclusion

This survey paper provides a thorough overview of the current research on measuring and modeling "culture" in large language models (LLMs). The authors have done an excellent job of synthesizing the various approaches being explored, including auditing LLMs for biases, expanding LLMs to incorporate other modalities, and designing specialized tasks to challenge LLMs.

The insights gained from this research have the potential to significantly improve our understanding of the cultural dynamics that emerge in these powerful AI systems and inform efforts to shape their behavior in more inclusive and beneficial ways. As the field of AI continues to advance, the ability to measure and model culture will become increasingly important for ensuring that these technologies are developed and deployed in a responsible and ethical manner.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

How Well Do LLMs Represent Values Across Cultures? Empirical Analysis of LLM Responses Based on Hofstede Cultural Dimensions

How Well Do LLMs Represent Values Across Cultures? Empirical Analysis of LLM Responses Based on Hofstede Cultural Dimensions

Julia Kharchenko, Tanya Roosta, Aman Chadha, Chirag Shah

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) attempt to imitate human behavior by responding to humans in a way that pleases them, including by adhering to their values. However, humans come from diverse cultures with different values. It is critical to understand whether LLMs showcase different values to the user based on the stereotypical values of a user's known country. We prompt different LLMs with a series of advice requests based on 5 Hofstede Cultural Dimensions -- a quantifiable way of representing the values of a country. Throughout each prompt, we incorporate personas representing 36 different countries and, separately, languages predominantly tied to each country to analyze the consistency in the LLMs' cultural understanding. Through our analysis of the responses, we found that LLMs can differentiate between one side of a value and another, as well as understand that countries have differing values, but will not always uphold the values when giving advice, and fail to understand the need to answer differently based on different cultural values. Rooted in these findings, we present recommendations for training value-aligned and culturally sensitive LLMs. More importantly, the methodology and the framework developed here can help further understand and mitigate culture and language alignment issues with LLMs.

Read more

6/24/2024

🤔

Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Large Language Models for Cultural Commonsense

Siqi Shen, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Moontae Lee, Honglak Lee, Soujanya Poria, Rada Mihalcea

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial commonsense understanding through numerous benchmark evaluations. However, their understanding of cultural commonsense remains largely unexamined. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive examination of the capabilities and limitations of several state-of-the-art LLMs in the context of cultural commonsense tasks. Using several general and cultural commonsense benchmarks, we find that (1) LLMs have a significant discrepancy in performance when tested on culture-specific commonsense knowledge for different cultures; (2) LLMs' general commonsense capability is affected by cultural context; and (3) The language used to query the LLMs can impact their performance on cultural-related tasks. Our study points to the inherent bias in the cultural understanding of LLMs and provides insights that can help develop culturally aware language models.

Read more

5/9/2024

CULTURE-GEN: Revealing Global Cultural Perception in Language Models through Natural Language Prompting

CULTURE-GEN: Revealing Global Cultural Perception in Language Models through Natural Language Prompting

Huihan Li, Liwei Jiang, Jena D. Huang, Hyunwoo Kim, Sebastin Santy, Taylor Sorensen, Bill Yuchen Lin, Nouha Dziri, Xiang Ren, Yejin Choi

YC

0

Reddit

0

As the utilization of large language models (LLMs) has proliferated worldwide, it is crucial for them to have adequate knowledge and fair representation for diverse global cultures. In this work, we uncover culture perceptions of three SOTA models on 110 countries and regions on 8 culture-related topics through culture-conditioned generations, and extract symbols from these generations that are associated to each culture by the LLM. We discover that culture-conditioned generation consist of linguistic markers that distinguish marginalized cultures apart from default cultures. We also discover that LLMs have an uneven degree of diversity in the culture symbols, and that cultures from different geographic regions have different presence in LLMs' culture-agnostic generation. Our findings promote further research in studying the knowledge and fairness of global culture perception in LLMs. Code and Data can be found in: https://github.com/huihanlhh/Culture-Gen/

Read more

4/30/2024

💬

Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions

Reem I. Masoud, Ziquan Liu, Martin Ferianc, Philip Treleaven, Miguel Rodrigues

YC

0

Reddit

0

The deployment of large language models (LLMs) raises concerns regarding their cultural misalignment and potential ramifications on individuals and societies with diverse cultural backgrounds. While the discourse has focused mainly on political and social biases, our research proposes a Cultural Alignment Test (Hoftede's CAT) to quantify cultural alignment using Hofstede's cultural dimension framework, which offers an explanatory cross-cultural comparison through the latent variable analysis. We apply our approach to quantitatively evaluate LLMs, namely Llama 2, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4, against the cultural dimensions of regions like the United States, China, and Arab countries, using different prompting styles and exploring the effects of language-specific fine-tuning on the models' behavioural tendencies and cultural values. Our results quantify the cultural alignment of LLMs and reveal the difference between LLMs in explanatory cultural dimensions. Our study demonstrates that while all LLMs struggle to grasp cultural values, GPT-4 shows a unique capability to adapt to cultural nuances, particularly in Chinese settings. However, it faces challenges with American and Arab cultures. The research also highlights that fine-tuning LLama 2 models with different languages changes their responses to cultural questions, emphasizing the need for culturally diverse development in AI for worldwide acceptance and ethical use. For more details or to contribute to this research, visit our GitHub page https://github.com/reemim/Hofstedes_CAT/

Read more

5/9/2024