Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: In-Context Learning vs. Prompting Based Factual Knowledge Extraction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper compares two approaches to extracting factual knowledge from large language models (LLMs): in-context learning and prompting-based knowledge extraction.
- The researchers investigate the reliability and accuracy of these methods for estimating the latent knowledge in LLMs.
- They conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of in-context learning and prompting-based extraction on a variety of factual knowledge tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and BERT have become incredibly powerful at natural language processing tasks. But how much actual factual knowledge do they contain in their "minds"? This is an important question, as these models are increasingly being used for tasks that require reliable access to real-world information.
The paper looks at two main ways to try to extract factual knowledge from LLMs: in-context learning and prompting-based knowledge extraction.
In-context learning involves giving the model a few examples or "context" about a particular topic, and then seeing if it can use that context to answer new questions. The idea is that the model can "learn" new knowledge on the fly from the provided context.
Prompting, on the other hand, involves carefully crafting textual "prompts" that guide the model to retrieve and output specific factual information. The prompts are designed to tap into the knowledge the model has already acquired during training.
The researchers ran extensive tests to compare the reliability and accuracy of these two approaches. They found some interesting tradeoffs - in-context learning can be more flexible, but prompting may be more reliable for certain types of factual knowledge. The paper provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these techniques for estimating the latent knowledge in LLMs.
Overall, this research is an important step towards better understanding and harnessing the capabilities of these powerful AI models, with implications for how we use them in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper compares two main approaches for extracting factual knowledge from large language models (LLMs):
-
In-context learning: This involves providing the model with a small amount of context (e.g. a few example sentences) about a topic, and then evaluating the model's ability to use that context to answer new questions. The idea is that the model can "learn" new knowledge on the fly from the provided context.
-
Prompting-based knowledge extraction: This involves crafting carefully designed textual "prompts" that are meant to guide the model to retrieve and output specific factual information from its internal knowledge base.
The researchers conducted extensive experiments to compare the reliability and accuracy of these two approaches across a variety of factual knowledge tasks.
Their results suggest that there are tradeoffs between the two methods. In-context learning can be more flexible, as it allows the model to dynamically adapt its knowledge to the provided context. However, prompting may be more reliable for certain types of factual knowledge retrieval, as the prompts can be tuned to better target the model's existing knowledge.
The paper also provides insights into how the context-sensitivity of LLMs can impact the effectiveness of these knowledge extraction techniques.
Overall, this research contributes valuable empirical findings to the growing body of work on understanding and improving the factual knowledge capabilities of large language models, with important implications for how we can best utilize these powerful AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed comparison of in-context learning and prompting-based approaches for extracting factual knowledge from LLMs. The experimental setup is rigorous, and the results offer clear insights into the tradeoffs between the two methods.
One potential limitation is that the study only evaluates performance on a relatively limited set of factual knowledge tasks. It would be interesting to see how the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two techniques play out on a broader range of real-world knowledge domains and applications.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons why prompting may be more reliable than in-context learning for certain types of factual knowledge. Further analysis of the cognitive and architectural factors at play could yield additional useful insights.
It would also be valuable to see the researchers explore ways to potentially combine or hybridize the in-context learning and prompting approaches, in order to leverage the complementary advantages of each. Such hybrid techniques could lead to even more reliable and flexible factual knowledge extraction from LLMs.
Overall, this is a well-executed and impactful study that advances our understanding of how to most effectively tap into the latent knowledge contained within large language models. The findings have important implications for the development of more trustworthy and capable AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive comparison of in-context learning and prompting-based approaches for extracting factual knowledge from large language models (LLMs). The researchers conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of these two knowledge extraction techniques across a variety of tasks.
The results offer valuable insights into the tradeoffs between the flexibility of in-context learning and the potential reliability of carefully crafted prompts. The findings have important implications for how we can best leverage the latent knowledge within LLMs to build more capable and trustworthy AI systems.
While the study is limited in scope, it represents an important step forward in our understanding of these powerful models. Further research exploring hybrid techniques and broader real-world applications could yield even deeper insights. Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to harness the full potential of large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: In-Context Learning vs. Prompting Based Factual Knowledge Extraction
Qinyuan Wu, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Soumi Das, Vedant Nanda, Bishwamittra Ghosh, Camila Kolling, Till Speicher, Laurent Bindschaedler, Krishna P. Gummadi, Evimaria Terzi
We propose an approach for estimating the latent knowledge embedded inside large language models (LLMs). We leverage the in-context learning (ICL) abilities of LLMs to estimate the extent to which an LLM knows the facts stored in a knowledge base. Our knowledge estimator avoids reliability concerns with previous prompting-based methods, is both conceptually simpler and easier to apply, and we demonstrate that it can surface more of the latent knowledge embedded in LLMs. We also investigate how different design choices affect the performance of ICL-based knowledge estimation. Using the proposed estimator, we perform a large-scale evaluation of the factual knowledge of a variety of open source LLMs, like OPT, Pythia, Llama(2), Mistral, Gemma, etc. over a large set of relations and facts from the Wikidata knowledge base. We observe differences in the factual knowledge between different model families and models of different sizes, that some relations are consistently better known than others but that models differ in the precise facts they know, and differences in the knowledge of base models and their finetuned counterparts.
Read more4/22/2024
💬
0
Hint-enhanced In-Context Learning wakes Large Language Models up for knowledge-intensive tasks
Yifan Wang, Qingyan Guo, Xinzhe Ni, Chufan Shi, Lemao Liu, Haiyun Jiang, Yujiu Yang
In-context learning (ICL) ability has emerged with the increasing scale of large language models (LLMs), enabling them to learn input-label mappings from demonstrations and perform well on downstream tasks. However, under the standard ICL setting, LLMs may sometimes neglect query-related information in demonstrations, leading to incorrect predictions. To address this limitation, we propose a new paradigm called Hint-enhanced In-Context Learning (HICL) to explore the power of ICL in open-domain question answering, an important form in knowledge-intensive tasks. HICL leverages LLMs' reasoning ability to extract query-related knowledge from demonstrations, then concatenates the knowledge to prompt LLMs in a more explicit way. Furthermore, we track the source of this knowledge to identify specific examples, and introduce a Hint-related Example Retriever (HER) to select informative examples for enhanced demonstrations. We evaluate HICL with HER on 3 open-domain QA benchmarks, and observe average performance gains of 2.89 EM score and 2.52 F1 score on gpt-3.5-turbo, 7.62 EM score and 7.27 F1 score on LLaMA-2-Chat-7B compared with standard setting.
Read more4/19/2024
0
What Matters in Learning Facts in Language Models? Multifaceted Knowledge Probing with Diverse Multi-Prompt Datasets
Xin Zhao, Naoki Yoshinaga, Daisuke Oba
Large language models (LLMs) face issues in handling factual knowledge, making it vital to evaluate their true ability to understand facts. In this study, we introduce knowledge probing frameworks, BELIEF(-ICL), to evaluate the knowledge understanding ability of not only encoder-based PLMs but also decoder-based PLMs from diverse perspectives. BELIEFs utilize a multi-prompt dataset to evaluate PLM's accuracy, consistency, and reliability in factual knowledge understanding. To provide a more reliable evaluation with BELIEFs, we semi-automatically create MyriadLAMA, which has more diverse prompts than existing datasets. We validate the effectiveness of BELIEFs in correctly and comprehensively evaluating PLM's factual understanding ability through extensive evaluations. We further investigate key factors in learning facts in LLMs, and reveal the limitation of the prompt-based knowledge probing. The dataset is anonymously publicized.
Read more6/19/2024
0
P-ICL: Point In-Context Learning for Named Entity Recognition with Large Language Models
Guochao Jiang, Zepeng Ding, Yuchen Shi, Deqing Yang
In recent years, the rise of large language models (LLMs) has made it possible to directly achieve named entity recognition (NER) without any demonstration samples or only using a few samples through in-context learning (ICL). However, standard ICL only helps LLMs understand task instructions, format and input-label mapping, but neglects the particularity of the NER task itself. In this paper, we propose a new prompting framework P-ICL to better achieve NER with LLMs, in which some point entities are leveraged as the auxiliary information to recognize each entity type. With such significant information, the LLM can achieve entity classification more precisely. To obtain optimal point entities for prompting LLMs, we also proposed a point entity selection method based on K-Means clustering. Our extensive experiments on some representative NER benchmarks verify the effectiveness of our proposed strategies in P-ICL and point entity selection.
Read more6/18/2024