Towards Transferable Attacks Against Vision-LLMs in Autonomous Driving with Typography

Overview

• Researchers investigate the vulnerabilities of vision-language models (Vision-LLMs) used in autonomous driving (AD) systems
• They focus on the risks of "typographic attacks" that can mislead these models' decision-making
• The paper proposes methods to generate and apply such attacks in realistic traffic scenarios

Plain English Explanation

Vision-language models (Vision-LLMs) are advanced AI systems that can understand and reason about both visual and textual information. These models are increasingly being incorporated into autonomous driving (AD) systems to handle tasks like perception, prediction, planning, and control.

However, Vision-LLMs have demonstrated susceptibilities against various types of adversarial attacks, which could compromise the reliability and safety of AD systems that rely on them. To further explore these risks, the researchers in this paper propose to leverage "typographic attacks" - manipulations of text and language that can mislead Vision-LLMs.

Unlike previous work on general datasets of typographic attacks, this paper focuses on realistic traffic scenarios where these attacks can be deployed. The researchers develop methods to automatically generate misleading text that can fool Vision-LLMs' reasoning, and study how these attacks can be physically implemented in real-world driving environments.

Through empirical evaluations, the paper demonstrates the effectiveness and transferability of these typographic attacks against several state-of-the-art Vision-LLMs used in AD systems, such as LLaVA, Qwen-VL, VILA, and Imp. This raises important concerns about the vulnerabilities of these models when integrated into safety-critical AD applications.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first propose a dataset-agnostic framework for automatically generating false answers that can mislead Vision-LLMs' reasoning. This involves developing linguistic augmentation schemes that can introduce attacks at both the image-level and region-level, as well as patterns that can target multiple reasoning tasks simultaneously.

Based on these techniques, the researchers then conduct a study on how typographic attacks can be realized in physical traffic scenarios. They evaluate the effectiveness, transferability, and realizability of these attacks against several state-of-the-art Vision-LLMs used in autonomous driving systems.

The empirical results demonstrate the particular harmfulness of the proposed typographic attacks, showing that they can significantly compromise the decision-making capabilities of the tested Vision-LLMs. This highlights the vulnerabilities of these models when incorporated into safety-critical autonomous driving applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and systematic investigation of typographic attacks against Vision-LLMs in autonomous driving contexts. The proposed methods for generating and applying these attacks are well-designed and the empirical evaluation is thorough.

However, the paper does not fully address the potential mitigation strategies or defenses against such attacks. While the researchers acknowledge the need for enhanced robustness in Vision-LLMs, they do not provide insights into how these models or the broader AD systems could be made more resilient to typographic manipulations.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on textual attacks, but does not consider the potential for other types of adversarial perturbations, such as those targeting the visual inputs. A more holistic assessment of the vulnerabilities of Vision-LLMs in autonomous driving would be valuable.

Further research is needed to explore the long-term implications of these findings and to develop more comprehensive solutions to ensure the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems that rely on advanced vision-language models.

Conclusion

This paper presents a concerning investigation into the vulnerabilities of vision-language models (Vision-LLMs) used in autonomous driving (AD) systems. The researchers demonstrate the potential for "typographic attacks" to significantly compromise the decision-making capabilities of these models, raising critical issues about their reliability and safety when integrated into real-world AD applications.

The study's findings highlight the need for continued research and development to enhance the robustness of Vision-LLMs and the broader AD systems that depend on them. As these advanced AI models become more prevalent in safety-critical domains, addressing their susceptibilities to adversarial attacks will be crucial to ensuring the safe and trustworthy deployment of autonomous vehicles.