Towards Truthful Multilingual Large Language Models: Benchmarking and Alignment Strategies

Read original: arXiv:2406.14434 - Published 6/21/2024 by Weihao Liu, Ning Wu, Wenbiao Ding, Shining Liang, Ming Gong, Dongmei Zhang
Total Score

0

Towards Truthful Multilingual Large Language Models: Benchmarking and Alignment Strategies

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores strategies for developing truthful and trustworthy multilingual large language models (LLMs).
  • The researchers propose benchmarking techniques and alignment strategies to improve the reliability and safety of these powerful AI systems.
  • The goal is to create LLMs that are not only capable, but also honest, helpful, and aligned with human values.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are artificial intelligence systems that can understand and generate human-like text in multiple languages. As these models become more advanced and widely used, it's crucial that they provide truthful and trustworthy information.

The researchers in this paper present methods for benchmarking the trustworthiness of multimodal LLMs and aligning LLMs with human values. This includes developing comprehensive benchmark datasets to assess an LLM's factual accuracy, coherence, and safety.

The goal is to create multilingual LLMs that can support real-world applications while being honest and helpful. By combining powerful language capabilities with strong ethical alignment, the researchers aim to achieve the best of both worlds - truthful and useful LLMs.

Technical Explanation

The paper first reviews the current state of multilingual LLM development, highlighting the need for robust benchmarking and alignment strategies to ensure these models are truthful and trustworthy.

The researchers then propose a comprehensive benchmark suite to assess an LLM's factual accuracy, coherence, and safety across multiple languages. This includes evaluating the model's ability to detect and correct misinformation, maintain logical consistency, and avoid harmful or biased outputs.

Additionally, the paper outlines alignment strategies to imbue LLMs with strong ethical principles and human values. This involves techniques like reward modeling, value learning, and constrained optimization to guide the model's behavior towards honesty, helpfulness, and beneficial outcomes for users.

The researchers also discuss the challenges of scaling these alignment approaches to large, multilingual LLMs, and explore potential solutions such as modular design and multi-task training.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of developing truthful and trustworthy multilingual LLMs. The proposed benchmarking and alignment strategies are well-grounded in existing research and address critical issues in the field.

However, the authors acknowledge that implementing these approaches at scale will be technically challenging and require significant research and engineering efforts. There are also open questions around the long-term robustness and generalizability of these techniques, as well as their potential impact on model performance and capabilities.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the societal implications of trustworthy LLMs, such as their potential to combat misinformation, improve access to reliable information, and promote more ethical AI development. Further exploration of these broader implications could strengthen the overall significance of the research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling vision for the future of multilingual large language models ā€“ one where these powerful AI systems are not only capable, but also honest, helpful, and aligned with human values. By developing robust benchmarking techniques and novel alignment strategies, the researchers aim to create LLMs that can be safely and reliably deployed in a wide range of real-world applications.

While significant technical challenges remain, the proposed approaches offer a promising path towards truthful and trustworthy multilingual AI that can support humans in verifying the truthfulness of information and achieve the best of both worlds - honesty and utility. As the field of language models continues to evolve, this research represents an important step towards [realizing the full potential of multimodal LLMs to benefit society.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

Towards Truthful Multilingual Large Language Models: Benchmarking and Alignment Strategies
Total Score

0

Towards Truthful Multilingual Large Language Models: Benchmarking and Alignment Strategies

Weihao Liu, Ning Wu, Wenbiao Ding, Shining Liang, Ming Gong, Dongmei Zhang

In the era of large language models (LLMs), building multilingual large language models (MLLMs) that can serve users worldwide holds great significance. However, existing research seldom focuses on the truthfulness of MLLMs. Meanwhile, contemporary multilingual aligning technologies struggle to balance massive languages and often exhibit serious truthfulness gaps across different languages, especially those that differ greatly from English. In our work, we construct a benchmark for truthfulness evaluation in multilingual scenarios and explore the ways to align facts across languages to enhance the truthfulness of MLLMs. Furthermore, we propose Fact-aware Multilingual Selective Synergy (FaMSS) to optimize the data allocation across a large number of languages and different data types. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach can effectively reduce the multilingual representation disparity and enhance the multilingual capabilities of LLMs.

Read more

6/21/2024

A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Bias
Total Score

0

A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Bias

Yuemei Xu, Ling Hu, Jiayi Zhao, Zihan Qiu, Yuqi Ye, Hanwen Gu

Based on the foundation of Large Language Models (LLMs), Multilingual Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been developed to address the challenges of multilingual natural language processing tasks, hoping to achieve knowledge transfer from high-resource to low-resource languages. However, significant limitations and challenges still exist, such as language imbalance, multilingual alignment, and inherent bias. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of MLLMs, delving deeply into discussions surrounding these critical issues. First of all, we start by presenting an overview of MLLMs, covering their evolution, key techniques, and multilingual capacities. Secondly, we explore widely utilized multilingual corpora for MLLMs' training and multilingual datasets oriented for downstream tasks that are crucial for enhancing the cross-lingual capability of MLLMs. Thirdly, we survey the existing studies on multilingual representations and investigate whether the current MLLMs can learn a universal language representation. Fourthly, we discuss bias on MLLMs including its category and evaluation metrics, and summarize the existing debiasing techniques. Finally, we discuss existing challenges and point out promising research directions. By demonstrating these aspects, this paper aims to facilitate a deeper understanding of MLLMs and their potentiality in various domains.

Read more

6/7/2024

šŸ’¬

Total Score

0

Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study

Yichi Zhang, Yao Huang, Yitong Sun, Chang Liu, Zhe Zhao, Zhengwei Fang, Yifan Wang, Huanran Chen, Xiao Yang, Xingxing Wei, Hang Su, Yinpeng Dong, Jun Zhu

Despite the superior capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across diverse tasks, they still face significant trustworthiness challenges. Yet, current literature on the assessment of trustworthy MLLMs remains limited, lacking a holistic evaluation to offer thorough insights into future improvements. In this work, we establish MultiTrust, the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs across five primary aspects: truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts, encompassing 32 diverse tasks with self-curated datasets. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks, highlighting the complexities introduced by the multimodality and underscoring the necessity for advanced methodologies to enhance their reliability. For instance, typical proprietary models still struggle with the perception of visually confusing images and are vulnerable to multimodal jailbreaking and adversarial attacks; MLLMs are more inclined to disclose privacy in text and reveal ideological and cultural biases even when paired with irrelevant images in inference, indicating that the multimodality amplifies the internal risks from base LLMs. Additionally, we release a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research, aiming to facilitate future advancements in this important field. Code and resources are publicly available at: https://multi-trust.github.io/.

Read more

6/12/2024

Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking
Total Score

0

Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking

Jiahui Geng, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Preslav Nakov, Iryna Gurevych

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) carry the potential to support humans in processing vast amounts of information. While MLLMs are already being used as a fact-checking tool, their abilities and limitations in this regard are understudied. Here is aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we propose a framework for systematically assessing the capacity of current multimodal models to facilitate real-world fact-checking. Our methodology is evidence-free, leveraging only these models' intrinsic knowledge and reasoning capabilities. By designing prompts that extract models' predictions, explanations, and confidence levels, we delve into research questions concerning model accuracy, robustness, and reasons for failure. We empirically find that (1) GPT-4V exhibits superior performance in identifying malicious and misleading multimodal claims, with the ability to explain the unreasonable aspects and underlying motives, and (2) existing open-source models exhibit strong biases and are highly sensitive to the prompt. Our study offers insights into combating false multimodal information and building secure, trustworthy multimodal models. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to evaluate MLLMs for real-world fact-checking.

Read more

4/29/2024