Training-Conditional Coverage Bounds for Uniformly Stable Learning Algorithms
2404.13731
0
0
📶
Abstract
The training-conditional coverage performance of the conformal prediction is known to be empirically sound. Recently, there have been efforts to support this observation with theoretical guarantees. The training-conditional coverage bounds for jackknife+ and full-conformal prediction regions have been established via the notion of $(m,n)$-stability by Liang and Barber~[2023]. Although this notion is weaker than uniform stability, it is not clear how to evaluate it for practical models. In this paper, we study the training-conditional coverage bounds of full-conformal, jackknife+, and CV+ prediction regions from a uniform stability perspective which is known to hold for empirical risk minimization over reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces with convex regularization. We derive coverage bounds for finite-dimensional models by a concentration argument for the (estimated) predictor function, and compare the bounds with existing ones under ridge regression.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for deriving training-conditional coverage bounds for uniformly stable learning algorithms.
- The authors develop a framework for analyzing the generalization performance of such algorithms, providing theoretical guarantees on the performance of the learned models.
- The proposed approach can be applied to a wide range of machine learning tasks and offers advantages over existing techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a method for analyzing the performance of certain machine learning algorithms, known as "uniformly stable" algorithms. These algorithms have the property that their outputs don't change too much when you make small changes to the training data.
The authors develop a framework that allows them to derive [object Object] on the performance of these algorithms, even before they are actually trained on any data. This is useful because it gives you a sense of how well the algorithm will generalize to new, unseen data.
The key idea is to look at how the algorithm's outputs change as you modify the training data. The authors show that if the algorithm is uniformly stable, then you can use this information to bound its [object Object].
This type of analysis can be applied to a wide range of machine learning tasks, and it offers some advantages over existing techniques. For example, it can provide [object Object] than some other methods, especially when the training data is limited.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework for deriving [object Object] for uniformly stable learning algorithms. Uniform stability is a property that bounds the sensitivity of an algorithm's outputs to small changes in the training data.
The authors show that for uniformly stable algorithms, it is possible to derive bounds on the generalization performance that hold with high probability, conditioned on the specific training data used. This is in contrast to standard generalization bounds, which hold unconditionally but may be overly conservative.
The key technical contributions are:
- A general theorem relating uniform stability to training-conditional coverage bounds.
- Specialized results for regression and classification tasks, with concrete examples of uniformly stable algorithms.
- Numerical experiments demonstrating the tightness of the derived bounds compared to existing approaches.
The authors argue that their framework offers several advantages, including the ability to provide [object Object] for the learned models, especially in small-data regimes.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a solid theoretical framework for analyzing the generalization performance of uniformly stable learning algorithms. The authors carefully derive their results and provide concrete examples, demonstrating the potential benefits of their approach.
However, the paper does not address some important practical considerations. For example, it is not always easy to verify that a given algorithm satisfies the uniform stability property, which is a key requirement of the framework. Additionally, the paper focuses on i.i.d. data settings, and it is unclear how the results would extend to more complex data distributions or structured prediction tasks.
Further research is needed to understand the limitations of the proposed approach and explore ways to relax some of the assumptions. It would also be valuable to see more extensive empirical evaluations, including comparisons to other state-of-the-art generalization analysis techniques.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for deriving [object Object] for a class of machine learning algorithms known as uniformly stable algorithms. The authors show that this approach can provide tighter generalization guarantees than existing methods, potentially leading to more accurate and reliable predictive models.
While the theoretical foundations of the work are solid, the practical applicability of the framework remains to be fully explored. Addressing the identified limitations and further validating the approach through extensive empirical studies could help solidify its impact on the field of machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌀
Training-Conditional Coverage Bounds under Covariate Shift
Mehrdad Pournaderi, Yu Xiang
0
0
Training-conditional coverage guarantees in conformal prediction concern the concentration of the error distribution, conditional on the training data, below some nominal level. The conformal prediction methodology has recently been generalized to the covariate shift setting, namely, the covariate distribution changes between the training and test data. In this paper, we study the training-conditional coverage properties of a range of conformal prediction methods under covariate shift via a weighted version of the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz (DKW) inequality tailored for distribution change. The result for the split conformal method is almost assumption-free, while the results for the full conformal and jackknife+ methods rely on strong assumptions including the uniform stability of the training algorithm.
5/28/2024
🔮
Conformal Prediction with Learned Features
Shayan Kiyani, George Pappas, Hamed Hassani
0
0
In this paper, we focus on the problem of conformal prediction with conditional guarantees. Prior work has shown that it is impossible to construct nontrivial prediction sets with full conditional coverage guarantees. A wealth of research has considered relaxations of full conditional guarantees, relying on some predefined uncertainty structures. Departing from this line of thinking, we propose Partition Learning Conformal Prediction (PLCP), a framework to improve conditional validity of prediction sets through learning uncertainty-guided features from the calibration data. We implement PLCP efficiently with alternating gradient descent, utilizing off-the-shelf machine learning models. We further analyze PLCP theoretically and provide conditional guarantees for infinite and finite sample sizes. Finally, our experimental results over four real-world and synthetic datasets show the superior performance of PLCP compared to state-of-the-art methods in terms of coverage and length in both classification and regression scenarios.
4/29/2024
↗️
Conditional validity of heteroskedastic conformal regression
Nicolas Dewolf, Bernard De Baets, Willem Waegeman
0
0
Conformal prediction, and split conformal prediction as a specific implementation, offer a distribution-free approach to estimating prediction intervals with statistical guarantees. Recent work has shown that split conformal prediction can produce state-of-the-art prediction intervals when focusing on marginal coverage, i.e. on a calibration dataset the method produces on average prediction intervals that contain the ground truth with a predefined coverage level. However, such intervals are often not adaptive, which can be problematic for regression problems with heteroskedastic noise. This paper tries to shed new light on how prediction intervals can be constructed, using methods such as normalized and Mondrian conformal prediction, in such a way that they adapt to the heteroskedasticity of the underlying process. Theoretical and experimental results are presented in which these methods are compared in a systematic way. In particular, it is shown how the conditional validity of a chosen conformal predictor can be related to (implicit) assumptions about the data-generating distribution.
5/1/2024
🔮
Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction
Lars van der Laan, Ahmed M. Alaa
0
0
In decision-making guided by machine learning, decision-makers may take identical actions in contexts with identical predicted outcomes. Conformal prediction helps decision-makers quantify uncertainty in point predictions of outcomes, allowing for better risk management for actions. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce textit{Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction} for regression, which combines two post-hoc approaches -- Venn-Abers calibration and conformal prediction -- to provide calibrated point predictions and compatible prediction intervals that are valid conditional on model predictions. Our procedure can be applied post-hoc to any black-box model to provide predictions and inferences with finite-sample prediction-conditional guarantees. Numerical experiments show our approach strikes a balance between interval efficiency and conditional validity.
4/23/2024