Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization with Sparse Rewards

2401.02225

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/11/2024 by Guojian Wang, Faguo Wu, Xiao Zhang
Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization with Sparse Rewards

Abstract

Mastering deep reinforcement learning (DRL) proves challenging in tasks featuring scant rewards. These limited rewards merely signify whether the task is partially or entirely accomplished, necessitating various exploration actions before the agent garners meaningful feedback. Consequently, the majority of existing DRL exploration algorithms struggle to acquire practical policies within a reasonable timeframe. To address this challenge, we introduce an approach leveraging offline demonstration trajectories for swifter and more efficient online RL in environments with sparse rewards. Our pivotal insight involves treating offline demonstration trajectories as guidance, rather than mere imitation, allowing our method to learn a policy whose distribution of state-action visitation marginally matches that of offline demonstrations. We specifically introduce a novel trajectory distance relying on maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) and cast policy optimization as a distance-constrained optimization problem. We then illustrate that this optimization problem can be streamlined into a policy-gradient algorithm, integrating rewards shaped by insights from offline demonstrations. The proposed algorithm undergoes evaluation across extensive discrete and continuous control tasks with sparse and misleading rewards. The experimental findings demonstrate the significant superiority of our proposed algorithm over baseline methods concerning diverse exploration and the acquisition of an optimal policy.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper explores a new reinforcement learning approach called Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization (TOPO) that aims to improve agent performance in sparse reward environments.
  • The key ideas are using trajectory-level rewards to guide exploration, leveraging offline demonstrations to warm-start the policy, and incorporating a shaping term to incentivize the agent to follow promising trajectories.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of TOPO on several challenging continuous control tasks with sparse rewards, showing it outperforms standard policy gradient methods.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful technique for training artificial agents to master complex tasks. However, RL can struggle when the rewards provided to the agent are sparse or infrequent, as it becomes difficult for the agent to learn which actions lead to meaningful progress.

The authors of this paper propose a new RL method called Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization (TOPO) that aims to address this challenge. The key idea is to guide the agent's exploration not just based on immediate rewards, but by considering the entire trajectory of actions and their long-term consequences.

TOPO does this in a few ways:

  1. Trajectory-Level Rewards: Instead of relying solely on sparse rewards, TOPO assigns "trajectory-level" rewards that evaluate the overall quality of the agent's sequence of actions over time. This gives the agent a clearer signal about which paths are promising to explore further.

  2. Offline Demonstrations: TOPO also leverages offline demonstrations of good behavior, which are used to warm-start the agent's policy and provide a helpful starting point for learning.

  3. Shaping Term: Finally, TOPO incorporates a "shaping term" that encourages the agent to stay close to the trajectories demonstrated in the offline data. This helps the agent avoid getting stuck in unproductive exploration.

The authors show that TOPO outperforms standard policy gradient methods on several challenging continuous control tasks with sparse rewards. This suggests the approach could be valuable for building agents that can effectively navigate complex environments with minimal feedback.

Technical Explanation

The Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization (TOPO) method proposed in this paper aims to address the challenge of sparse rewards in reinforcement learning. Sparse rewards occur when the agent only receives meaningful feedback on its performance at infrequent intervals, making it difficult to learn which actions lead to positive outcomes.

TOPO tackles this issue by incorporating three key elements:

  1. Trajectory-Level Rewards: Instead of relying solely on the sparse per-step rewards, TOPO defines a "trajectory-level" reward function that evaluates the quality of the agent's entire sequence of actions over a time horizon. This provides the agent with a clearer signal about which paths are promising to explore further.

  2. Offline Demonstrations: The method also leverages offline demonstrations of good behavior, which are used to warm-start the agent's policy. This helps the agent learn more efficiently by providing a helpful starting point.

  3. Shaping Term: Finally, TOPO introduces a "shaping term" that encourages the agent to stay close to the trajectories demonstrated in the offline data. This helps prevent the agent from getting stuck in unproductive exploration.

The authors evaluate TOPO on several challenging continuous control tasks with sparse rewards, such as reaching a target in a complex environment or navigating a robot through a maze. The results show that TOPO outperforms standard policy gradient methods, demonstrating the effectiveness of the trajectory-oriented approach and the benefits of leveraging offline demonstrations and shaping.

Critical Analysis

The authors of this paper have made a compelling case for the Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization (TOPO) approach, showing its advantages over standard policy gradient methods in sparse reward environments. However, there are a few potential caveats and areas for further research that could be explored:

  1. Reliance on Offline Demonstrations: While the use of offline demonstrations helps warm-start the agent's policy, it also introduces a dependence on the quality and coverage of the demonstration data. If the demonstrations do not adequately represent the full range of possible behaviors, the agent's learning may be biased or limited.

  2. Generalization to More Complex Environments: The authors have primarily evaluated TOPO on relatively simple continuous control tasks. It would be valuable to see how the method scales and performs in more complex, realistic environments with higher-dimensional state and action spaces.

  3. Interpretability of Trajectory-Level Rewards: The paper does not provide much insight into how the trajectory-level rewards are defined and how they can be designed to capture the right high-level objectives. More transparency around this aspect could help users understand the method's strengths and limitations better.

  4. Computational Efficiency: Optimizing policies based on trajectory-level rewards may introduce additional computational challenges compared to standard per-step rewards. The authors could explore ways to improve the efficiency of the TOPO algorithm to make it more practical for real-world applications.

Despite these potential areas for further research, the Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization approach represents an interesting and promising direction for improving reinforcement learning performance in sparse reward environments. The authors have presented a solid theoretical foundation and empirical evidence to support the merits of their method, which could inspire future work in this area.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new reinforcement learning approach called Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization (TOPO) that aims to address the challenge of sparse rewards. The key ideas are:

  1. Using trajectory-level rewards to guide the agent's exploration, rather than relying solely on immediate per-step rewards.
  2. Leveraging offline demonstrations to warm-start the agent's policy and provide a helpful starting point for learning.
  3. Incorporating a shaping term to encourage the agent to stay close to the demonstrated trajectories, preventing it from getting stuck in unproductive exploration.

The authors demonstrate that TOPO outperforms standard policy gradient methods on several challenging continuous control tasks with sparse rewards, suggesting the approach could be valuable for building agents that can effectively navigate complex environments with minimal feedback.

While the method shows promise, there are some potential caveats and areas for further research, such as the reliance on offline demonstrations, scaling to more complex environments, and improving computational efficiency. Nevertheless, the Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization framework represents an interesting and innovative direction for improving reinforcement learning in sparse reward settings, with potential implications for a wide range of real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Policy Optimization with Smooth Guidance Learned from State-Only Demonstrations

Policy Optimization with Smooth Guidance Learned from State-Only Demonstrations

Guojian Wang, Faguo Wu, Xiao Zhang, Tianyuan Chen, Zhiming Zheng

YC

0

Reddit

0

The sparsity of reward feedback remains a challenging problem in online deep reinforcement learning (DRL). Previous approaches have utilized offline demonstrations to achieve impressive results in multiple hard tasks. However, these approaches place high demands on demonstration quality, and obtaining expert-like actions is often costly and unrealistic. To tackle these problems, we propose a simple and efficient algorithm called Policy Optimization with Smooth Guidance (POSG), which leverages a small set of state-only demonstrations (where only state information is included in demonstrations) to indirectly make approximate and feasible long-term credit assignments and facilitate exploration. Specifically, we first design a trajectory-importance evaluation mechanism to determine the quality of the current trajectory against demonstrations. Then, we introduce a guidance reward computation technology based on trajectory importance to measure the impact of each state-action pair. We theoretically analyze the performance improvement caused by smooth guidance rewards and derive a new worst-case lower bound on the performance improvement. Extensive results demonstrate POSG's significant advantages in control performance and convergence speed in four sparse-reward environments, including the grid-world maze, Hopper-v4, HalfCheetah-v4, and Ant maze. Notably, the specific metrics and quantifiable results are investigated to demonstrate the superiority of POSG.

Read more

4/11/2024

DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF

DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF

Han Zhong, Guhao Feng, Wei Xiong, Li Zhao, Di He, Jiang Bian, Liwei Wang

YC

0

Reddit

0

In the classical Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is employed to learn from sparse, sentence-level rewards -- a challenging scenario in traditional deep reinforcement learning. Despite the great successes of PPO in the alignment of state-of-the-art closed-source large language models (LLMs), its open-source implementation is still largely sub-optimal, as widely reported by numerous research studies. To address these issues, we introduce a framework that models RLHF problems as a Markov decision process (MDP), enabling the capture of fine-grained token-wise information. Furthermore, we provide theoretical insights that demonstrate the superiority of our MDP framework over the previous sentence-level bandit formulation. Under this framework, we introduce an algorithm, dubbed as Reinforced Token Optimization (texttt{RTO}), which learns the token-wise reward function from preference data and performs policy optimization based on this learned token-wise reward signal. Theoretically, texttt{RTO} is proven to have the capability of finding the near-optimal policy sample-efficiently. For its practical implementation, texttt{RTO} innovatively integrates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and PPO. DPO, originally derived from sparse sentence rewards, surprisingly provides us with a token-wise characterization of response quality, which is seamlessly incorporated into our subsequent PPO training stage. Extensive real-world alignment experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Read more

4/30/2024

🏅

Goal-conditioned Offline Reinforcement Learning through State Space Partitioning

Mianchu Wang, Yue Jin, Giovanni Montana

YC

0

Reddit

0

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) aims to infer sequential decision policies using only offline datasets. This is a particularly difficult setup, especially when learning to achieve multiple different goals or outcomes under a given scenario with only sparse rewards. For offline learning of goal-conditioned policies via supervised learning, previous work has shown that an advantage weighted log-likelihood loss guarantees monotonic policy improvement. In this work we argue that, despite its benefits, this approach is still insufficient to fully address the distribution shift and multi-modality problems. The latter is particularly severe in long-horizon tasks where finding a unique and optimal policy that goes from a state to the desired goal is challenging as there may be multiple and potentially conflicting solutions. To tackle these challenges, we propose a complementary advantage-based weighting scheme that introduces an additional source of inductive bias: given a value-based partitioning of the state space, the contribution of actions expected to lead to target regions that are easier to reach, compared to the final goal, is further increased. Empirically, we demonstrate that the proposed approach, Dual-Advantage Weighted Offline Goal-conditioned RL (DAWOG), outperforms several competing offline algorithms in commonly used benchmarks. Analytically, we offer a guarantee that the learnt policy is never worse than the underlying behaviour policy.

Read more

5/17/2024

🏅

Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Interactive Data Collection: Fundamental Hardness and Near-Optimal Algorithm

Miao Lu, Han Zhong, Tong Zhang, Jose Blanchet

YC

0

Reddit

0

The sim-to-real gap, which represents the disparity between training and testing environments, poses a significant challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). A promising approach to addressing this challenge is distributionally robust RL, often framed as a robust Markov decision process (RMDP). In this framework, the objective is to find a robust policy that achieves good performance under the worst-case scenario among all environments within a pre-specified uncertainty set centered around the training environment. Unlike previous work, which relies on a generative model or a pre-collected offline dataset enjoying good coverage of the deployment environment, we tackle robust RL via interactive data collection, where the learner interacts with the training environment only and refines the policy through trial and error. In this robust RL paradigm, two main challenges emerge: managing distributional robustness while striking a balance between exploration and exploitation during data collection. Initially, we establish that sample-efficient learning without additional assumptions is unattainable owing to the curse of support shift; i.e., the potential disjointedness of the distributional supports between the training and testing environments. To circumvent such a hardness result, we introduce the vanishing minimal value assumption to RMDPs with a total-variation (TV) distance robust set, postulating that the minimal value of the optimal robust value function is zero. We prove that such an assumption effectively eliminates the support shift issue for RMDPs with a TV distance robust set, and present an algorithm with a provable sample complexity guarantee. Our work makes the initial step to uncovering the inherent difficulty of robust RL via interactive data collection and sufficient conditions for designing a sample-efficient algorithm accompanied by sharp sample complexity analysis.

Read more

4/5/2024