Trust and Resilience in Federated Learning Through Smart Contracts Enabled Decentralized Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Federated Learning: A machine learning approach where multiple devices collaborate to train a shared model without sharing their raw data.
- Blockchain: A decentralized, distributed digital ledger that records transactions across many computers in a network.
- Smart Contracts: Self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into lines of code.
- Decentralized Systems: Systems that are not controlled by a single authority and are instead distributed across multiple nodes.
Plain English Explanation
Federated learning is a way for multiple devices, like phones or computers, to work together to train a machine learning model without sharing their private data. This is useful for situations where data privacy is important, like in healthcare or finance.
The paper suggests using blockchain and smart contracts to build a decentralized system for federated learning. This could help create a more trustworthy and resilient federated learning system.
In a decentralized system, there is no single authority in control. Instead, the system is distributed across many different nodes or devices. This can make the system more robust and less vulnerable to attacks or failures.
The smart contracts are like digital agreements that automatically execute when certain conditions are met. They could help manage the federated learning process in a fair and transparent way, for example by rewarding devices that contribute useful updates to the shared model.
Overall, the paper explores how decentralized systems and smart contracts could improve the trustworthiness and resilience of federated learning, which could lead to wider adoption of this privacy-preserving machine learning approach.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for decentralized, smart contract-enabled federated learning. In this system, federated learning clients (devices participating in the model training) interact with each other and a federated learning coordinator through a blockchain network.
The key components include:
- Federated Learning Clients: The devices or entities participating in the federated learning process, each with their own local data.
- Federated Learning Coordinator: A component that manages the overall federated learning workflow, including model aggregation.
- Blockchain Network: The decentralized infrastructure that facilitates secure, transparent interactions between the clients and coordinator.
- Smart Contracts: Self-executing digital agreements on the blockchain that govern the federated learning process, such as client selection, model updates, and rewards.
The paper outlines how this architecture can enhance the trust and resilience of federated learning compared to centralized approaches. For example, the blockchain's immutable ledger and smart contracts can ensure fair and transparent model contributions, while the decentralized nature can improve system reliability and robustness.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling vision for improving the trustworthiness and resilience of federated learning through the use of blockchain and smart contracts. However, the authors acknowledge several practical challenges and limitations that would need to be addressed:
- Scalability: Handling the computational and storage demands of a large-scale federated learning system on a blockchain network could be technically challenging.
- Complexity: Integrating the federated learning workflow with the blockchain infrastructure and smart contracts may increase the overall system complexity, which could impact reliability and adoption.
- Incentive Alignment: Designing the right incentive mechanisms and reward structures in the smart contracts to motivate honest and beneficial participation from clients is an open research problem.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential concerns around the environmental impact of blockchain-based systems or the regulatory implications of using a decentralized approach for sensitive applications like healthcare or finance.
Further research and real-world experimentation would be needed to fully evaluate the practicality and effectiveness of this approach compared to alternative federated learning architectures, such as those using trusted execution environments or federated Bayesian learning.
Conclusion
The paper presents an innovative approach to enhancing the trust and resilience of federated learning through the integration of blockchain and smart contracts. By leveraging the decentralized, transparent, and tamper-resistant properties of blockchain technology, the proposed framework aims to address some of the key challenges facing federated learning, such as ensuring fairness, transparency, and reliability in the model training process.
While the authors acknowledge several practical limitations that would need to be addressed, the overall concept has the potential to contribute to the ongoing efforts to make federated learning a more secure and trustworthy machine learning paradigm, with applications in domains where data privacy and system reliability are of paramount importance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Trust and Resilience in Federated Learning Through Smart Contracts Enabled Decentralized Systems
Lorenzo Cassano, Jacopo D'Abramo, Siraj Munir, Stefano Ferretti
In this paper, we present a study of a Federated Learning (FL) system, based on the use of decentralized architectures to ensure trust and increase reliability. The system is based on the idea that the FL collaborators upload the (ciphered) model parameters on the Inter-Planetary File System (IPFS) and interact with a dedicated smart contract to track their behavior. Thank to this smart contract, the phases of parameter updates are managed efficiently, thereby strengthening data security. We have carried out an experimental study that exploits two different methods of weight aggregation, i.e., a classic averaging scheme and a federated proximal aggregation. The results confirm the feasibility of the proposal.
Read more7/10/2024
0
SCALE: Self-regulated Clustered federAted LEarning in a Homogeneous Environment
Sai Puppala, Ismail Hossain, Md Jahangir Alam, Sajedul Talukder, Zahidur Talukder, Syed Bahauddin
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a transformative approach for enabling distributed machine learning while preserving user privacy, yet it faces challenges like communication inefficiencies and reliance on centralized infrastructures, leading to increased latency and costs. This paper presents a novel FL methodology that overcomes these limitations by eliminating the dependency on edge servers, employing a server-assisted Proximity Evaluation for dynamic cluster formation based on data similarity, performance indices, and geographical proximity. Our integrated approach enhances operational efficiency and scalability through a Hybrid Decentralized Aggregation Protocol, which merges local model training with peer-to-peer weight exchange and a centralized final aggregation managed by a dynamically elected driver node, significantly curtailing global communication overhead. Additionally, the methodology includes Decentralized Driver Selection, Check-pointing to reduce network traffic, and a Health Status Verification Mechanism for system robustness. Validated using the breast cancer dataset, our architecture not only demonstrates a nearly tenfold reduction in communication overhead but also shows remarkable improvements in reducing training latency and energy consumption while maintaining high learning performance, offering a scalable, efficient, and privacy-preserving solution for the future of federated learning ecosystems.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Decentralized Personalized Federated Learning
Salma Kharrat, Marco Canini, Samuel Horvath
This work tackles the challenges of data heterogeneity and communication limitations in decentralized federated learning. We focus on creating a collaboration graph that guides each client in selecting suitable collaborators for training personalized models that leverage their local data effectively. Our approach addresses these issues through a novel, communication-efficient strategy that enhances resource efficiency. Unlike traditional methods, our formulation identifies collaborators at a granular level by considering combinatorial relations of clients, enhancing personalization while minimizing communication overhead. We achieve this through a bi-level optimization framework that employs a constrained greedy algorithm, resulting in a resource-efficient collaboration graph for personalized learning. Extensive evaluation against various baselines across diverse datasets demonstrates the superiority of our method, named DPFL. DPFL consistently outperforms other approaches, showcasing its effectiveness in handling real-world data heterogeneity, minimizing communication overhead, enhancing resource efficiency, and building personalized models in decentralized federated learning scenarios.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Provable Privacy Advantages of Decentralized Federated Learning via Distributed Optimization
Wenrui Yu, Qiongxiu Li, Milan Lopuhaa-Zwakenberg, Mads Gr{ae}sb{o}ll Christensen, Richard Heusdens
Federated learning (FL) emerged as a paradigm designed to improve data privacy by enabling data to reside at its source, thus embedding privacy as a core consideration in FL architectures, whether centralized or decentralized. Contrasting with recent findings by Pasquini et al., which suggest that decentralized FL does not empirically offer any additional privacy or security benefits over centralized models, our study provides compelling evidence to the contrary. We demonstrate that decentralized FL, when deploying distributed optimization, provides enhanced privacy protection - both theoretically and empirically - compared to centralized approaches. The challenge of quantifying privacy loss through iterative processes has traditionally constrained the theoretical exploration of FL protocols. We overcome this by conducting a pioneering in-depth information-theoretical privacy analysis for both frameworks. Our analysis, considering both eavesdropping and passive adversary models, successfully establishes bounds on privacy leakage. We show information theoretically that the privacy loss in decentralized FL is upper bounded by the loss in centralized FL. Compared to the centralized case where local gradients of individual participants are directly revealed, a key distinction of optimization-based decentralized FL is that the relevant information includes differences of local gradients over successive iterations and the aggregated sum of different nodes' gradients over the network. This information complicates the adversary's attempt to infer private data. To bridge our theoretical insights with practical applications, we present detailed case studies involving logistic regression and deep neural networks. These examples demonstrate that while privacy leakage remains comparable in simpler models, complex models like deep neural networks exhibit lower privacy risks under decentralized FL.
Read more7/15/2024