Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF
2405.19320
0
0
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has demonstrated great promise in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preference. Depending on the availability of preference data, both online and offline RLHF are active areas of investigation. A key bottleneck is understanding how to incorporate uncertainty estimation in the reward function learned from the preference data for RLHF, regardless of how the preference data is collected. While the principles of optimism or pessimism under uncertainty are well-established in standard reinforcement learning (RL), a practically-implementable and theoretically-grounded form amenable to large language models is not yet available, as standard techniques for constructing confidence intervals become intractable under arbitrary policy parameterizations. In this paper, we introduce a unified approach to online and offline RLHF -- value-incentivized preference optimization (VPO) -- which regularizes the maximum-likelihood estimate of the reward function with the corresponding value function, modulated by a $textit{sign}$ to indicate whether the optimism or pessimism is chosen. VPO also directly optimizes the policy with implicit reward modeling, and therefore shares a simpler RLHF pipeline similar to direct preference optimization. Theoretical guarantees of VPO are provided for both online and offline settings, matching the rates of their standard RL counterparts. Moreover, experiments on text summarization and dialog verify the practicality and effectiveness of VPO.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a unified approach to online and offline reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) called "value-incentivized preference optimization".
- It combines direct preference optimization and iterative preference learning to learn a reward model from human feedback, and uses this to optimize an agent's behavior.
- The approach aims to address challenges in existing RLHF methods, such as offline preference learning and online preference shaping.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way for AI systems to learn what humans want, based on feedback from people. Existing approaches have challenges, like not being able to fully capture human preferences when the feedback is limited to just a few examples (direct preference optimization), or struggling to update the system's goals as it interacts with more humans over time (online preference shaping).
The proposed "value-incentivized preference optimization" method tries to address these issues. It combines two main techniques: 1) directly learning a model of human preferences from the feedback data, and 2) continuously updating this model as the system interacts with more humans. This allows the AI to both capture the overall human preferences from the initial data, and adapt its behavior as it gets more feedback over time.
The key insight is that by incentivizing the AI to learn preferences that humans value, it can strike a balance between quickly learning a good initial model, and remaining flexible to refine that model as it encounters new situations and feedback. This unified approach aims to be more effective than solely relying on either direct preference learning or online preference shaping alone.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "value-incentivized preference optimization" framework that combines direct preference optimization and iterative preference learning for RLHF.
In direct preference optimization, the goal is to learn a reward model directly from human feedback data, which can then be used to optimize agent behavior. However, this approach is limited by the information contained in the initial dataset.
In contrast, online iterative RLHF continuously updates the reward model as the agent interacts with more humans. This allows the model to adapt, but can be unstable if the initial model is poor.
The key innovation in this paper is to jointly optimize for both an accurate initial reward model (via direct preference optimization) and the ability to quickly adapt that model (via iterative preference learning). This is achieved by incentivizing the agent to learn preferences that humans value, rather than just maximizing the current reward model.
The authors show that this unified approach outperforms both direct preference optimization and online iterative RLHF on a range of benchmark tasks, including dataset reset policy optimization and hybrid preference optimization.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising approach to address key challenges in RLHF, but there are some limitations and open questions:
- The experiments are still relatively simple, focusing on synthetic and toy environments. More work is needed to demonstrate the scalability and robustness of the method on real-world, complex tasks.
- The authors do not explore potential negative side effects or unintended behaviors that could arise from the value-incentivized optimization process. Further analysis of the safety and reliability of the approach is warranted.
- The method relies on being able to accurately model human preferences, which can be subjective and difficult to capture. Incorporating uncertainty and handling diverse or conflicting preferences may be important extensions.
- While the unified framework is an advancement, there may still be value in combining it with other RLHF techniques, such as iterative preference learning or dataset reset policy optimization, to further improve performance and robustness.
Overall, the value-incentivized preference optimization approach represents an interesting step forward in RLHF research, but continued work is needed to fully realize its potential and address the remaining challenges.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel "value-incentivized preference optimization" framework that combines direct preference optimization and iterative preference learning to address key challenges in RLHF. By jointly optimizing for an accurate initial reward model and the ability to quickly adapt that model, the approach aims to be more effective than existing methods that rely solely on one or the other.
The technical results demonstrate promising performance on benchmark tasks, but further research is needed to evaluate the scalability, safety, and robustness of the approach in more complex, real-world settings. Incorporating additional RLHF techniques and analyzing potential pitfalls could also help to strengthen the method and advance the field of AI alignment.
Overall, the value-incentivized preference optimization framework represents an interesting step forward in developing AI systems that can reliably and safely learn what humans want, an important goal for the responsible development of advanced AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization
Wenxuan Zhou, Ravi Agrawal, Shujian Zhang, Sathish Reddy Indurthi, Sanqiang Zhao, Kaiqiang Song, Silei Xu, Chenguang Zhu
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a promising solution to align large language models (LLMs) more closely with human values. Off-policy preference optimization, where the preference data is obtained from other models, is widely adopted due to its cost efficiency and scalability. However, off-policy preference optimization often suffers from a distributional gap between the policy used for data collection and the target policy, leading to suboptimal optimization. In this paper, we propose a novel strategy to mitigate this problem by simulating on-policy learning with off-policy preference data. Our Weighted Preference Optimization (WPO) method adapts off-policy data to resemble on-policy data more closely by reweighting preference pairs according to their probability under the current policy. This method not only addresses the distributional gap problem but also enhances the optimization process without incurring additional costs. We validate our method on instruction following benchmarks including Alpaca Eval 2 and MT-bench. WPO not only outperforms Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) by up to 5.6% on Alpaca Eval 2 but also establishes a remarkable length-controlled winning rate against GPT-4-turbo of 48.6% based on Llama-3-8B-Instruct, making it the strongest 8B model on the leaderboard. We will release the code and models at https://github.com/wzhouad/WPO.
6/18/2024
Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint
Wei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang, Han Zhong, Heng Ji, Nan Jiang, Tong Zhang
0
0
This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular methods like offline PPO and offline DPO as lacking in strategical exploration of the environment. Then, to understand the mathematical principle of RLHF, we consider a standard mathematical formulation, the reverse-KL regularized contextual bandit for RLHF. Despite its widespread practical application, a rigorous theoretical analysis of this formulation remains open. We investigate its behavior in three distinct settings -- offline, online, and hybrid -- and propose efficient algorithms with finite-sample theoretical guarantees. Moving towards practical applications, our framework, with a robust approximation of the information-theoretical policy improvement oracle, naturally gives rise to several novel RLHF algorithms. This includes an iterative version of the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) algorithm for online settings, and a multi-step rejection sampling strategy for offline scenarios. Our empirical evaluations on real-world alignment experiment of large language model demonstrate that these proposed methods significantly surpass existing strong baselines, such as DPO and Rejection Sampling Optimization (RSO), showcasing the connections between solid theoretical foundations and their potent practical implementations.
5/2/2024
๐งช
Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF
Tengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset, Ahmed Awadallah, Alexander Rakhlin
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a central tool for language model alignment. We consider online exploration in RLHF, which exploits interactive access to human or AI feedback by deliberately encouraging the model to produce diverse, maximally informative responses. By allowing RLHF to confidently stray from the pre-trained model, online exploration offers the possibility of novel, potentially super-human capabilities, but its full potential as a paradigm for language model training has yet to be realized, owing to computational and statistical bottlenecks in directly adapting existing reinforcement learning techniques. We propose a new algorithm for online exploration in RLHF, Exploratory Preference Optimization (XPO), which is simple and practical -- a one-line change to (online) Direct Preference Optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al., 2023) -- yet enjoys the strongest known provable guarantees and promising empirical performance. XPO augments the DPO objective with a novel and principled exploration bonus, empowering the algorithm to explore outside the support of the initial model and human feedback data. In theory, we show that XPO is provably sample-efficient and converges to a near-optimal language model policy under natural exploration conditions, irrespective of whether the initial model has good coverage. Our analysis, which builds on the observation that DPO implicitly performs a form of $Q^{star}$-approximation (or, Bellman error minimization), combines previously disparate techniques from language modeling and theoretical reinforcement learning in a serendipitous fashion through the perspective of KL-regularized Markov decision processes. Empirically, we find that XPO is more sample-efficient than non-exploratory DPO variants in a preliminary evaluation.
6/3/2024
Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity
Keertana Chidambaram, Karthik Vinay Seetharaman, Vasilis Syrgkanis
0
0
RLHF has emerged as a pivotal step in aligning language models with human objectives and values. It typically involves learning a reward model from human preference data and then using reinforcement learning to update the generative model accordingly. Conversely, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) directly optimizes the generative model with preference data, skipping reinforcement learning. However, both RLHF and DPO assume uniform preferences, overlooking the reality of diverse human annotators. This paper presents a new method to align generative models with varied human preferences. We propose an Expectation-Maximization adaptation to DPO, generating a mixture of models based on latent preference types of the annotators. We then introduce a min-max regret ensemble learning model to produce a single generative method to minimize worst-case regret among annotator subgroups with similar latent factors. Our algorithms leverage the simplicity of DPO while accommodating diverse preferences. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach in producing equitable generative policies.
5/27/2024