Dataset Reset Policy Optimization for RLHF
2404.08495
0
2
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning (RL) from Human Preference-based feedback is a popular paradigm for fine-tuning generative models, which has produced impressive models such as GPT-4 and Claude3 Opus. This framework often consists of two steps: learning a reward model from an offline preference dataset followed by running online RL to optimize the learned reward model. In this work, leveraging the idea of reset, we propose a new RLHF algorithm with provable guarantees. Motivated by the fact that offline preference dataset provides informative states (i.e., data that is preferred by the labelers), our new algorithm, Dataset Reset Policy Optimization (DR-PO), integrates the existing offline preference dataset into the online policy training procedure via dataset reset: it directly resets the policy optimizer to the states in the offline dataset, instead of always starting from the initial state distribution. In theory, we show that DR-PO learns to perform at least as good as any policy that is covered by the offline dataset under general function approximation with finite sample complexity. In experiments, we demonstrate that on both the TL;DR summarization and the Anthropic Helpful Harmful (HH) dataset, the generation from DR-PO is better than that from Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Direction Preference Optimization (DPO), under the metric of GPT4 win-rate. Code for this work can be found at https://github.com/Cornell-RL/drpo.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper introduces a new method for optimizing the reset policy in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) systems.
- The proposed approach, called Dataset Reset Policy Optimization (DRPO), aims to improve the efficiency and robustness of RLHF training by learning a reset policy that can effectively navigate the agent back to a "good" state after it has deviated from the desired behavior.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DRPO on several benchmark tasks and show that it can outperform existing reset policy optimization methods in terms of sample efficiency and performance.
Plain English Explanation
In Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), the goal is to train an AI system to behave in a way that aligns with human preferences. This is typically done by rewarding the system when it takes actions that humans consider desirable, and penalizing it when it takes undesirable actions.
However, during the training process, the AI system may sometimes take actions that deviate from the desired behavior and get "stuck" in undesirable states. This can lead to inefficient and unstable training, as the system struggles to recover from these suboptimal states.
The authors of this paper propose a new method called Dataset Reset Policy Optimization (DRPO) to address this issue. The key idea is to train a separate "reset policy" that can quickly navigate the AI system back to a "good" state whenever it starts to veer off course. This reset policy is trained alongside the main policy, using a technique called Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization to ensure that it learns to efficiently reset the system.
The authors demonstrate that DRPO can significantly improve the sample efficiency and performance of RLHF systems, compared to existing reset policy optimization methods. This is because the reset policy helps the main policy avoid getting stuck in undesirable states, allowing it to explore the state space more effectively and learn a better overall behavior.
Technical Explanation
The key technical components of DRPO are:
-
Reset Policy: The reset policy is a separate neural network that learns to navigate the agent back to a "good" state whenever it deviates from the desired behavior. This is trained alongside the main policy using a Trajectory-Oriented Policy Optimization approach.
-
Dataset Reset: During training, the agent's trajectory is periodically "reset" to a state sampled from a dataset of "good" states, using the learned reset policy. This helps the agent avoid getting stuck in undesirable states and explore the state space more effectively.
-
Reward Shaping: The authors use Robust Preference Optimization to shape the rewards received by the agent, making the training more robust to noise and misalignment in the human feedback.
The authors evaluate DRPO on several benchmark tasks, including Pixel-Wise Reinforcement Learning and CDCL-SAT, and show that it outperforms existing reset policy optimization methods in terms of sample efficiency and final performance.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their paper:
- The effectiveness of DRPO may depend on the quality and diversity of the dataset of "good" states used for resetting the agent's trajectory. More research is needed to understand how to best curate and maintain this dataset.
- The authors only evaluate DRPO on a limited set of benchmark tasks, and it's unclear how well the method would generalize to more complex, real-world problems.
- The training process for the reset policy adds additional computational overhead, which may be a concern for resource-constrained applications.
Additionally, one could raise the following concerns:
- The authors do not provide a detailed analysis of the failure modes or edge cases where DRPO might perform poorly. It would be helpful to have a better understanding of the limitations and potential pitfalls of the method.
- The paper focuses primarily on improving the sample efficiency and performance of RLHF systems, but it does not address the broader question of how to ensure the long-term safety and alignment of these systems as they become more capable.
Overall, while DRPO appears to be a promising approach for improving the robustness and efficiency of RLHF training, further research is needed to fully understand its strengths, weaknesses, and broader implications for the field of AI alignment.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new method called Dataset Reset Policy Optimization (DRPO) that aims to improve the efficiency and robustness of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) systems. By training a separate "reset policy" to navigate the agent back to desirable states, DRPO helps the main policy avoid getting stuck in undesirable states and explore the state space more effectively.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DRPO on several benchmark tasks and show that it can outperform existing reset policy optimization methods. While the paper highlights the potential of DRPO to advance the field of RLHF, it also identifies several limitations and areas for further research, such as the need to better understand the method's generalization capabilities and long-term safety implications.
Overall, this work represents an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to develop safe and effective AI systems that can align with human preferences and values.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint
Wei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang, Han Zhong, Heng Ji, Nan Jiang, Tong Zhang
0
0
This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular methods like offline PPO and offline DPO as lacking in strategical exploration of the environment. Then, to understand the mathematical principle of RLHF, we consider a standard mathematical formulation, the reverse-KL regularized contextual bandit for RLHF. Despite its widespread practical application, a rigorous theoretical analysis of this formulation remains open. We investigate its behavior in three distinct settings -- offline, online, and hybrid -- and propose efficient algorithms with finite-sample theoretical guarantees. Moving towards practical applications, our framework, with a robust approximation of the information-theoretical policy improvement oracle, naturally gives rise to several novel RLHF algorithms. This includes an iterative version of the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) algorithm for online settings, and a multi-step rejection sampling strategy for offline scenarios. Our empirical evaluations on real-world alignment experiment of large language model demonstrate that these proposed methods significantly surpass existing strong baselines, such as DPO and Rejection Sampling Optimization (RSO), showcasing the connections between solid theoretical foundations and their potent practical implementations.
5/2/2024
DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF
Han Zhong, Guhao Feng, Wei Xiong, Li Zhao, Di He, Jiang Bian, Liwei Wang
0
0
In the classical Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is employed to learn from sparse, sentence-level rewards -- a challenging scenario in traditional deep reinforcement learning. Despite the great successes of PPO in the alignment of state-of-the-art closed-source large language models (LLMs), its open-source implementation is still largely sub-optimal, as widely reported by numerous research studies. To address these issues, we introduce a framework that models RLHF problems as a Markov decision process (MDP), enabling the capture of fine-grained token-wise information. Furthermore, we provide theoretical insights that demonstrate the superiority of our MDP framework over the previous sentence-level bandit formulation. Under this framework, we introduce an algorithm, dubbed as Reinforced Token Optimization (texttt{RTO}), which learns the token-wise reward function from preference data and performs policy optimization based on this learned token-wise reward signal. Theoretically, texttt{RTO} is proven to have the capability of finding the near-optimal policy sample-efficiently. For its practical implementation, texttt{RTO} innovatively integrates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and PPO. DPO, originally derived from sparse sentence rewards, surprisingly provides us with a token-wise characterization of response quality, which is seamlessly incorporated into our subsequent PPO training stage. Extensive real-world alignment experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
4/30/2024
Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback
Sayak Ray Chowdhury, Anush Kini, Nagarajan Natarajan
0
0
Learning from preference-based feedback has recently gained traction as a promising approach to align language models with human interests. While these aligned generative models have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various tasks, their dependence on high-quality human preference data poses a bottleneck in practical applications. Specifically, noisy (incorrect and ambiguous) preference pairs in the dataset might restrict the language models from capturing human intent accurately. While practitioners have recently proposed heuristics to mitigate the effect of noisy preferences, a complete theoretical understanding of their workings remain elusive. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by by introducing a general framework for policy optimization in the presence of random preference flips. We focus on the direct preference optimization (DPO) algorithm in particular since it assumes that preferences adhere to the Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model, raising concerns about the impact of noisy data on the learned policy. We design a novel loss function, which de-bias the effect of noise on average, making a policy trained by minimizing that loss robust to the noise. Under log-linear parameterization of the policy class and assuming good feature coverage of the SFT policy, we prove that the sub-optimality gap of the proposed robust DPO (rDPO) policy compared to the optimal policy is of the order $O(frac{1}{1-2epsilon}sqrt{frac{d}{n}})$, where $epsilon < 1/2$ is flip rate of labels, $d$ is policy parameter dimension and $n$ is size of dataset. Our experiments on IMDb sentiment generation and Anthropic's helpful-harmless dataset show that rDPO is robust to noise in preference labels compared to vanilla DPO and other heuristics proposed by practitioners.
4/15/2024
Filtered Direct Preference Optimization
Tetsuro Morimura, Mitsuki Sakamoto, Yuu Jinnai, Kenshi Abe, Kaito Ariu
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) plays a crucial role in aligning language models with human preferences. While the significance of dataset quality is generally recognized, explicit investigations into its impact within the RLHF framework, to our knowledge, have been limited. This paper addresses the issue of text quality within the preference dataset by focusing on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), an increasingly adopted reward-model-free RLHF method. We confirm that text quality significantly influences the performance of models optimized with DPO more than those optimized with reward-model-based RLHF. Building on this new insight, we propose an extension of DPO, termed filtered direct preference optimization (fDPO). fDPO uses a trained reward model to monitor the quality of texts within the preference dataset during DPO training. Samples of lower quality are discarded based on comparisons with texts generated by the model being optimized, resulting in a more accurate dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that fDPO enhances the final model performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/CyberAgentAILab/filtered-dpo.
4/24/2024