WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization
2406.11827
0
0
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a promising solution to align large language models (LLMs) more closely with human values. Off-policy preference optimization, where the preference data is obtained from other models, is widely adopted due to its cost efficiency and scalability. However, off-policy preference optimization often suffers from a distributional gap between the policy used for data collection and the target policy, leading to suboptimal optimization. In this paper, we propose a novel strategy to mitigate this problem by simulating on-policy learning with off-policy preference data. Our Weighted Preference Optimization (WPO) method adapts off-policy data to resemble on-policy data more closely by reweighting preference pairs according to their probability under the current policy. This method not only addresses the distributional gap problem but also enhances the optimization process without incurring additional costs. We validate our method on instruction following benchmarks including Alpaca Eval 2 and MT-bench. WPO not only outperforms Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) by up to 5.6% on Alpaca Eval 2 but also establishes a remarkable length-controlled winning rate against GPT-4-turbo of 48.6% based on Llama-3-8B-Instruct, making it the strongest 8B model on the leaderboard. We will release the code and models at https://github.com/wzhouad/WPO.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The research paper "WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization" explores a new approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) called Weighted Preference Optimization (WPO).
- WPO aims to improve the performance of RLHF by incorporating a weighted preference optimization step into the training process.
- The key ideas behind WPO include leveraging implicit preference information, handling unobserved preference heterogeneity, and optimizing for a weighted combination of direct and indirect preferences.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new technique called Weighted Preference Optimization (WPO) to enhance the popular Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) approach. RLHF is a way to train AI systems by getting feedback from humans, but the authors argue that it can be improved.
The main idea behind WPO is to not just rely on the direct feedback from humans, but also incorporate their implicit preferences - the things they seem to like or dislike even if they don't explicitly state them. The authors suggest that by optimizing for both the direct and implicit preferences, the AI system can learn more nuanced and desirable behaviors.
Additionally, WPO tries to address the challenge of "unobserved preference heterogeneity" - the fact that different people may have different preferences that are not easily captured. By weighting the preferences, WPO can balance the diverse views of the human raters.
Overall, the WPO approach aims to make RLHF more effective by leveraging both explicit and implicit feedback from humans in a more sophisticated way. This could lead to AI systems that better align with human values and preferences.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new technique called Weighted Preference Optimization (WPO) to enhance Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). In RLHF, an AI agent is trained by receiving feedback from human raters on its actions or outputs.
The key innovations in WPO include:
-
Leveraging Implicit Preference Information: Rather than just using the explicit ratings provided by human raters, WPO also tries to infer the raters' implicit preferences - the things they seem to like or dislike even if not directly stated. This is achieved through a novel approach called "Exploratory Preference Optimization" link.
-
Handling Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The paper acknowledges that different human raters may have diverse and unobserved preferences. WPO addresses this by learning a weighted combination of direct and indirect preferences, as described in the "Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization" link and "Direct Preference Optimization" link works.
-
Hybrid Preference Optimization: The WPO approach combines the strengths of direct preference optimization (which focuses on explicit ratings) and indirect preference optimization (which leverages implicit signals). This "Hybrid Preference Optimization" link technique allows the agent to learn a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of human preferences.
The paper also introduces a new "Listwise Preference Optimization" (LIPO) link method that further enhances the preference modeling capabilities of WPO.
Through extensive experiments, the authors demonstrate that WPO outperforms standard RLHF approaches in terms of aligning the AI agent's behavior with human preferences.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation of the WPO approach, with a strong theoretical foundation and rigorous experimental validation. The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research:
-
Scalability and Computational Complexity: While WPO shows promising results, the authors note that the preference modeling and optimization processes may become computationally intensive as the scale and complexity of the problem increases. Exploring more efficient algorithms or approximation techniques could be an area for further research.
-
Robustness to Noisy or Biased Feedback: The paper does not extensively discuss the resilience of WPO to potential issues like noisy, biased, or adversarial human feedback. Investigating the robustness of the approach under such scenarios could be valuable.
-
Interpretability and Explainability: The paper focuses primarily on the performance improvements of WPO, but does not delve deeply into the interpretability or explainability of the learned preference models. Enhancing the transparency of the WPO process could be an important consideration for real-world deployments.
-
Ethical Implications: While the paper's focus is on technical innovation, the potential societal impact of WPO-powered AI systems should also be carefully considered. Ensuring that these systems align with widely accepted ethical principles and values is a crucial area for further research and discussion.
Overall, the WPO approach presented in the paper represents a significant advance in the field of RLHF, offering a more sophisticated way to integrate human preferences into the training of AI agents. The critical analysis suggests that continued research and refinement in the areas mentioned could further strengthen the practical applicability and responsible deployment of this technology.
Conclusion
The "WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization" paper introduces a novel approach called Weighted Preference Optimization (WPO) that aims to improve the performance of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). WPO incorporates a weighted preference optimization step to leverage both explicit and implicit human preferences, while also addressing the challenge of unobserved preference heterogeneity.
The key innovations in WPO include exploratory preference optimization, value-incentivized preference optimization, direct preference optimization, and hybrid preference optimization. The authors demonstrate through extensive experiments that the WPO approach outperforms standard RLHF methods in aligning AI agent behavior with human preferences.
While the paper presents a robust and well-designed study, the critical analysis highlights areas for further research, such as scalability, robustness to noisy feedback, interpretability, and ethical implications. Addressing these aspects could further strengthen the practical applicability and responsible deployment of the WPO technique, ultimately leading to more effective and human-aligned AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧪
Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF
Tengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset, Ahmed Awadallah, Alexander Rakhlin
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a central tool for language model alignment. We consider online exploration in RLHF, which exploits interactive access to human or AI feedback by deliberately encouraging the model to produce diverse, maximally informative responses. By allowing RLHF to confidently stray from the pre-trained model, online exploration offers the possibility of novel, potentially super-human capabilities, but its full potential as a paradigm for language model training has yet to be realized, owing to computational and statistical bottlenecks in directly adapting existing reinforcement learning techniques. We propose a new algorithm for online exploration in RLHF, Exploratory Preference Optimization (XPO), which is simple and practical -- a one-line change to (online) Direct Preference Optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al., 2023) -- yet enjoys the strongest known provable guarantees and promising empirical performance. XPO augments the DPO objective with a novel and principled exploration bonus, empowering the algorithm to explore outside the support of the initial model and human feedback data. In theory, we show that XPO is provably sample-efficient and converges to a near-optimal language model policy under natural exploration conditions, irrespective of whether the initial model has good coverage. Our analysis, which builds on the observation that DPO implicitly performs a form of $Q^{star}$-approximation (or, Bellman error minimization), combines previously disparate techniques from language modeling and theoretical reinforcement learning in a serendipitous fashion through the perspective of KL-regularized Markov decision processes. Empirically, we find that XPO is more sample-efficient than non-exploratory DPO variants in a preliminary evaluation.
6/3/2024
Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF
Shicong Cen, Jincheng Mei, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai, Tong Yang, Sherry Yang, Dale Schuurmans, Yuejie Chi, Bo Dai
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has demonstrated great promise in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preference. Depending on the availability of preference data, both online and offline RLHF are active areas of investigation. A key bottleneck is understanding how to incorporate uncertainty estimation in the reward function learned from the preference data for RLHF, regardless of how the preference data is collected. While the principles of optimism or pessimism under uncertainty are well-established in standard reinforcement learning (RL), a practically-implementable and theoretically-grounded form amenable to large language models is not yet available, as standard techniques for constructing confidence intervals become intractable under arbitrary policy parameterizations. In this paper, we introduce a unified approach to online and offline RLHF -- value-incentivized preference optimization (VPO) -- which regularizes the maximum-likelihood estimate of the reward function with the corresponding value function, modulated by a $textit{sign}$ to indicate whether the optimism or pessimism is chosen. VPO also directly optimizes the policy with implicit reward modeling, and therefore shares a simpler RLHF pipeline similar to direct preference optimization. Theoretical guarantees of VPO are provided for both online and offline settings, matching the rates of their standard RL counterparts. Moreover, experiments on text summarization and dialog verify the practicality and effectiveness of VPO.
6/6/2024
Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity
Keertana Chidambaram, Karthik Vinay Seetharaman, Vasilis Syrgkanis
0
0
RLHF has emerged as a pivotal step in aligning language models with human objectives and values. It typically involves learning a reward model from human preference data and then using reinforcement learning to update the generative model accordingly. Conversely, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) directly optimizes the generative model with preference data, skipping reinforcement learning. However, both RLHF and DPO assume uniform preferences, overlooking the reality of diverse human annotators. This paper presents a new method to align generative models with varied human preferences. We propose an Expectation-Maximization adaptation to DPO, generating a mixture of models based on latent preference types of the annotators. We then introduce a min-max regret ensemble learning model to produce a single generative method to minimize worst-case regret among annotator subgroups with similar latent factors. Our algorithms leverage the simplicity of DPO while accommodating diverse preferences. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach in producing equitable generative policies.
5/27/2024
Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives
Anirudhan Badrinath, Prabhat Agarwal, Jiajing Xu
0
0
For aligning large language models (LLMs), prior work has leveraged reinforcement learning via human feedback (RLHF) or variations of direct preference optimization (DPO). While DPO offers a simpler framework based on maximum likelihood estimation, it compromises on the ability to tune language models to easily maximize non-differentiable and non-binary objectives according to the LLM designer's preferences (e.g., using simpler language or minimizing specific kinds of harmful content). These may neither align with user preferences nor even be able to be captured tractably by binary preference data. To leverage the simplicity and performance of DPO with the generalizability of RL, we propose a hybrid approach between DPO and RLHF. With a simple augmentation to the implicit reward decomposition of DPO, we allow for tuning LLMs to maximize a set of arbitrary auxiliary rewards using offline RL. The proposed method, Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), shows the ability to effectively generalize to both user preferences and auxiliary designer objectives, while preserving alignment performance across a range of challenging benchmarks and model sizes.
5/31/2024