VerMCTS: Synthesizing Multi-Step Programs using a Verifier, a Large Language Model, and Tree Search
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) can generate useful code, but the code they generate is often not reliable or trustworthy.
- The paper presents VerMCTS, an approach that combines an LLM with a logical verifier and a modified Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to generate verified programs in Dafny and Coq.
- VerMCTS leverages the verifier to provide feedback within the MCTS algorithm, helping to estimate the value function and guide the search towards verified programs.
- The researchers developed a new suite of multi-step verified programming problems in Dafny and Coq to evaluate VerMCTS.
- VerMCTS demonstrates a significant improvement in the pass rate for these problems compared to repeated sampling from the base LLM.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly adept at generating useful code, but the code they produce can often be unreliable or even incorrect. To address this issue, the researchers developed a new approach called VerMCTS that combines an LLM with a logical verifier and a modified version of a search algorithm called Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS).
The key idea behind VerMCTS is to use the verifier to provide feedback within the MCTS algorithm. As the search algorithm explores different code options, it can check the partial programs at each step to estimate how likely they are to be correct and verified. This feedback helps guide the search towards programs that are more likely to be sound and verified.
To test the performance of VerMCTS, the researchers developed a new set of challenging programming problems that require multiple steps to solve and can be verified using formal logic systems like Dafny and Coq. When compared to repeatedly sampling from the base LLM, VerMCTS demonstrated a significant improvement in the pass rate for these problems, showing that it can generate more reliable and trustworthy code.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents VerMCTS, an approach that combines a large language model (LLM) with a logical verifier and a modified Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to generate verified programs in Dafny and Coq.
The key innovation of VerMCTS is the integration of the verifier within the MCTS algorithm. As the search explores different code options, it can use the verifier to check the partial programs at each step and estimate an upper bound on the value function. This feedback from the verifier helps the search algorithm navigate towards programs that are more likely to be sound and verified.
To evaluate the performance of VerMCTS, the researchers developed a new suite of multi-step verified programming problems in Dafny and Coq. These problems require several steps to solve and can be verified using formal logic systems. The researchers used a new metric called "pass@T," which measures the pass rate given a budget of T tokens sampled from the LLM.
Compared to repeatedly sampling from the base LLM, VerMCTS demonstrated a more than 30% absolute increase in the average pass@5000 across the suite of verified programming problems. This significant improvement shows the value of integrating a logical verifier with an LLM and the MCTS algorithm to generate more reliable and trustworthy code.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the reliability and trustworthiness of code generated by large language models. The integration of a logical verifier within the MCTS algorithm is a novel and clever idea that leverages the strengths of both the LLM and the formal verification system.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed discussion of the limitations or potential drawbacks of the VerMCTS approach. For example, the performance of the system may be heavily dependent on the quality and coverage of the training data for the LLM, as well as the capabilities of the specific logical verifier being used. Additionally, the computational complexity of the modified MCTS algorithm and the overhead of the verification process may limit the scalability of the approach to larger and more complex programming problems.
Another potential area for further research is the generalization of VerMCTS beyond the specific programming languages and verification systems used in this paper. Exploring the applicability of the approach to a wider range of formal verification tools and programming domains could further demonstrate its versatility and impact.
Conclusion
The VerMCTS approach presented in this paper represents a significant step towards generating reliable and trustworthy code using large language models. By integrating a logical verifier with an LLM and a modified MCTS algorithm, the researchers have developed a system that can produce verified programs with a much higher success rate than the base LLM alone.
This work has important implications for the practical use of LLMs in mission-critical software development, where the reliability and correctness of the generated code are paramount. The new suite of verified programming problems and the pass@T metric introduced in the paper also provide a valuable benchmark for evaluating and comparing future advances in this area.
Overall, the VerMCTS paper demonstrates the potential for combining the generative power of LLMs with the rigor of formal verification to create more robust and trustworthy code generation systems. As large language models continue to evolve, research like this will be crucial in unlocking their full potential for practical applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
VerMCTS: Synthesizing Multi-Step Programs using a Verifier, a Large Language Model, and Tree Search
David Brandfonbrener, Simon Henniger, Sibi Raja, Tarun Prasad, Chloe Loughridge, Federico Cassano, Sabrina Ruixin Hu, Jianang Yang, William E. Byrd, Robert Zinkov, Nada Amin
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate useful code, but often the code they generate cannot be trusted to be sound. In this paper, we present VerMCTS, an approach to begin to resolve this issue by generating verified programs in Dafny and Coq. VerMCTS uses a logical verifier in concert with an LLM to guide a modified Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). This approach leverages the verifier to gain intermediate feedback inside the search algorithm by checking partial programs at each step to estimate an upper bound on the value function. To measure the performance of VerMCTS, we develop a new suite of multi-step verified programming problems in Dafny and Coq. In terms of pass@T, a new metric which computes the pass rate given a budget of T tokens sampled from the LLM, VerMCTS leads to more than a 30% absolute increase in average pass@5000 across the suite over repeated sampling from the base language model. Our code and benchmarks are available at https://github.com/namin/llm-verified-with-monte-carlo-tree-search .
Read more5/27/2024
0
RethinkMCTS: Refining Erroneous Thoughts in Monte Carlo Tree Search for Code Generation
Qingyao Li, Wei Xia, Kounianhua Du, Xinyi Dai, Ruiming Tang, Yasheng Wang, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
LLM agents enhanced by tree search algorithms have yielded notable performances in code generation. However, current search algorithms in this domain suffer from low search quality due to several reasons: 1) Ineffective design of the search space for the high-reasoning demands of code generation tasks, 2) Inadequate integration of code feedback with the search algorithm, and 3) Poor handling of negative feedback during the search, leading to reduced search efficiency and quality. To address these challenges, we propose to search for the reasoning process of the code and use the detailed feedback of code execution to refine erroneous thoughts during the search. In this paper, we introduce RethinkMCTS, which employs the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to conduct thought-level searches before generating code, thereby exploring a wider range of strategies. More importantly, we construct verbal feedback from fine-grained code execution feedback to refine erroneous thoughts during the search. This ensures that the search progresses along the correct reasoning paths, thus improving the overall search quality of the tree by leveraging execution feedback. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that RethinkMCTS outperforms previous search-based and feedback-based code generation baselines. On the HumanEval dataset, it improves the pass@1 of GPT-3.5-turbo from 70.12 to 89.02 and GPT-4o-mini from 87.20 to 94.51. It effectively conducts more thorough exploration through thought-level searches and enhances the search quality of the entire tree by incorporating rethink operation.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Lemur: Integrating Large Language Models in Automated Program Verification
Haoze Wu, Clark Barrett, Nina Narodytska
The demonstrated code-understanding capability of LLMs raises the question of whether they can be used for automated program verification, a task that demands high-level abstract reasoning about program properties that is challenging for verification tools. We propose a general methodology to combine the power of LLMs and automated reasoners for automated program verification. We formally describe this methodology as a set of transition rules and prove its soundness. We instantiate the calculus as a sound automated verification procedure and demonstrate practical improvements on a set of synthetic and competition benchmarks.
Read more4/26/2024
69
Accessing GPT-4 level Mathematical Olympiad Solutions via Monte Carlo Tree Self-refine with LLaMa-3 8B
Di Zhang, Xiaoshui Huang, Dongzhan Zhou, Yuqiang Li, Wanli Ouyang
This paper introduces the MCT Self-Refine (MCTSr) algorithm, an innovative integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), designed to enhance performance in complex mathematical reasoning tasks. Addressing the challenges of accuracy and reliability in LLMs, particularly in strategic and mathematical reasoning, MCTSr leverages systematic exploration and heuristic self-refine mechanisms to improve decision-making frameworks within LLMs. The algorithm constructs a Monte Carlo search tree through iterative processes of Selection, self-refine, self-evaluation, and Backpropagation, utilizing an improved Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) formula to optimize the exploration-exploitation balance. Extensive experiments demonstrate MCTSr's efficacy in solving Olympiad-level mathematical problems, significantly improving success rates across multiple datasets, including GSM8K, GSM Hard, MATH, and Olympiad-level benchmarks, including Math Odyssey, AIME, and OlympiadBench. The study advances the application of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks and sets a foundation for future AI integration, enhancing decision-making accuracy and reliability in LLM-driven applications.
Read more6/14/2024