Vul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAG
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents Vul-RAG, a novel approach to enhance large language model (LLM)-based vulnerability detection by leveraging knowledge-level retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
- Vul-RAG aims to improve the accuracy and robustness of LLM-based vulnerability detection models by incorporating external knowledge sources during the generation process.
- The authors demonstrate that Vul-RAG outperforms existing LLM-based vulnerability detection methods on various datasets, showcasing its effectiveness in enhancing vulnerability detection capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
Vul-RAG is a new way to improve the ability of AI language models to detect software vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities are weaknesses in computer programs that can be exploited by attackers. Current AI models can identify some vulnerabilities, but they don't always perform well.
The key idea behind Vul-RAG is to give the AI model access to additional knowledge sources, like databases of known vulnerabilities, during the detection process. This helps the model better understand the context and nature of vulnerabilities, leading to more accurate and reliable predictions.
The researchers show that Vul-RAG outperforms other AI-based vulnerability detection methods on multiple benchmark datasets. This suggests that using external knowledge can significantly enhance the capabilities of language models in this important security domain.
Technical Explanation
The Vul-RAG paper proposes a novel approach to leverage retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) in detecting software vulnerabilities.
The key innovation of Vul-RAG is its integration of external knowledge sources, such as vulnerability databases, during the vulnerability detection process. This is achieved by using a RAG architecture, where the LLM is combined with a retrieval module that can access and incorporate relevant knowledge from these external sources.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Vul-RAG through extensive experiments on various vulnerability detection datasets. They show that Vul-RAG outperforms existing LLM-based methods, highlighting the benefits of leveraging external knowledge to enhance the vulnerability detection capabilities of language models.
Critical Analysis
The Vul-RAG paper presents a promising approach to improving LLM-based vulnerability detection, but it also raises some potential concerns and areas for further research.
One limitation mentioned in the paper is the need for high-quality and comprehensive vulnerability knowledge bases to fully realize the benefits of Vul-RAG. The performance of the system is dependent on the breadth and accuracy of the external sources it can access, which may not always be readily available.
Additionally, the authors acknowledge that Vul-RAG, like other retrieval-augmented language models, may be susceptible to certain types of adversarial attacks that target the retrieval component. Further research is needed to address these potential vulnerabilities and ensure the robustness of the system.
Overall, the Vul-RAG approach represents a step forward in enhancing the capabilities of LLMs for vulnerability detection, but continued research and development will be necessary to address the challenges and limitations identified in the paper.
Conclusion
The Vul-RAG paper introduces an innovative approach to leveraging external knowledge sources to improve the performance of LLM-based vulnerability detection models. By combining LLMs with a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) architecture, the system can access and incorporate relevant vulnerability information, leading to more accurate and robust vulnerability predictions.
The results presented in the paper suggest that the Vul-RAG approach holds significant promise for enhancing security-critical applications that rely on language models. As the authors note, further research is needed to address potential limitations, such as the availability of comprehensive vulnerability knowledge bases and the vulnerability of RAG-based systems to certain types of attacks.
Overall, the Vul-RAG paper represents an important contribution to the field of AI-powered vulnerability detection, demonstrating the potential benefits of integrating external knowledge sources into language models for security-critical tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Vul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAG
Xueying Du, Geng Zheng, Kaixin Wang, Jiayi Feng, Wentai Deng, Mingwei Liu, Bihuan Chen, Xin Peng, Tao Ma, Yiling Lou
Vulnerability detection is essential for software quality assurance. In recent years, deep learning models (especially large language models) have shown promise in vulnerability detection. In this work, we propose a novel LLM-based vulnerability detection technique Vul-RAG, which leverages knowledge-level retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework to detect vulnerability for the given code in three phases. First, Vul-RAG constructs a vulnerability knowledge base by extracting multi-dimension knowledge via LLMs from existing CVE instances; second, for a given code snippet, Vul-RAG} retrieves the relevant vulnerability knowledge from the constructed knowledge base based on functional semantics; third, Vul-RAG leverages LLMs to check the vulnerability of the given code snippet by reasoning the presence of vulnerability causes and fixing solutions of the retrieved vulnerability knowledge. Our evaluation of Vul-RAG on our constructed benchmark PairVul shows that Vul-RAG substantially outperforms all baselines by 12.96%/110% relative improvement in accuracy/pairwise-accuracy. In addition, our user study shows that the vulnerability knowledge generated by Vul-RAG can serve as high-quality explanations which can improve the manual detection accuracy from 0.60 to 0.77.
Read more6/21/2024
0
BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Yebowen Hu, Fei Liu, Xun Chen, Qian Lou
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by outdated information and a tendency to generate incorrect data, commonly referred to as hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by combining the strengths of retrieval-based methods and generative models. This approach involves retrieving relevant information from a large, up-to-date dataset and using it to enhance the generation process, leading to more accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Despite its benefits, RAG introduces a new attack surface for LLMs, particularly because RAG databases are often sourced from public data, such as the web. In this paper, we propose TrojRAG{} to identify the vulnerabilities and attacks on retrieval parts (RAG database) and their indirect attacks on generative parts (LLMs). Specifically, we identify that poisoning several customized content passages could achieve a retrieval backdoor, where the retrieval works well for clean queries but always returns customized poisoned adversarial queries. Triggers and poisoned passages can be highly customized to implement various attacks. For example, a trigger could be a semantic group like The Republican Party, Donald Trump, etc. Adversarial passages can be tailored to different contents, not only linked to the triggers but also used to indirectly attack generative LLMs without modifying them. These attacks can include denial-of-service attacks on RAG and semantic steering attacks on LLM generations conditioned by the triggers. Our experiments demonstrate that by just poisoning 10 adversarial passages can induce 98.2% success rate to retrieve the adversarial passages. Then, these passages can increase the reject ratio of RAG-based GPT-4 from 0.01% to 74.6% or increase the rate of negative responses from 0.22% to 72% for targeted queries.
Read more6/7/2024
0
PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Wei Zou, Runpeng Geng, Binghui Wang, Jinyuan Jia
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success due to their exceptional generative capabilities. Despite their success, they also have inherent limitations such as a lack of up-to-date knowledge and hallucination. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a state-of-the-art technique to mitigate these limitations. The key idea of RAG is to ground the answer generation of an LLM on external knowledge retrieved from a knowledge database. Existing studies mainly focus on improving the accuracy or efficiency of RAG, leaving its security largely unexplored. We aim to bridge the gap in this work. We find that the knowledge database in a RAG system introduces a new and practical attack surface. Based on this attack surface, we propose PoisonedRAG, the first knowledge corruption attack to RAG, where an attacker could inject a few malicious texts into the knowledge database of a RAG system to induce an LLM to generate an attacker-chosen target answer for an attacker-chosen target question. We formulate knowledge corruption attacks as an optimization problem, whose solution is a set of malicious texts. Depending on the background knowledge (e.g., black-box and white-box settings) of an attacker on a RAG system, we propose two solutions to solve the optimization problem, respectively. Our results show PoisonedRAG could achieve a 90% attack success rate when injecting five malicious texts for each target question into a knowledge database with millions of texts. We also evaluate several defenses and our results show they are insufficient to defend against PoisonedRAG, highlighting the need for new defenses.
Read more8/14/2024
0
RAGLAB: A Modular and Research-Oriented Unified Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Xuanwang Zhang, Yunze Song, Yidong Wang, Shuyun Tang, Xinfeng Li, Zhengran Zeng, Zhen Wu, Wei Ye, Wenyuan Xu, Yue Zhang, Xinyu Dai, Shikun Zhang, Qingsong Wen
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate human-level capabilities in dialogue, reasoning, and knowledge retention. However, even the most advanced LLMs face challenges such as hallucinations and real-time updating of their knowledge. Current research addresses this bottleneck by equipping LLMs with external knowledge, a technique known as Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). However, two key issues constrained the development of RAG. First, there is a growing lack of comprehensive and fair comparisons between novel RAG algorithms. Second, open-source tools such as LlamaIndex and LangChain employ high-level abstractions, which results in a lack of transparency and limits the ability to develop novel algorithms and evaluation metrics. To close this gap, we introduce RAGLAB, a modular and research-oriented open-source library. RAGLAB reproduces 6 existing algorithms and provides a comprehensive ecosystem for investigating RAG algorithms. Leveraging RAGLAB, we conduct a fair comparison of 6 RAG algorithms across 10 benchmarks. With RAGLAB, researchers can efficiently compare the performance of various algorithms and develop novel algorithms.
Read more9/10/2024