A Watermark for Low-entropy and Unbiased Generation in Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2405.14604 - Published 5/24/2024 by Minjia Mao, Dongjun Wei, Zeyu Chen, Xiao Fang, Michael Chau
Total Score

0

🛸

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about accurately detecting LLM-generated content
  • Previous work has proposed unbiased watermarking methods to address this issue, but they require access to LLMs and input prompts during detection, which is impractical for local deployment
  • This study introduces the Sampling One Then Accepting (STA-1) method, an unbiased watermark that does not require access to LLMs or prompts during detection and has statistical guarantees for the type II error

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, this capability also raises concerns about the potential misuse of these models, such as creating fake content that is difficult to distinguish from genuine text.

To address this issue, researchers have developed a technique called "watermarking" that injects imperceptible identifiers into the output of LLMs. These watermarks make it possible to reliably detect when content has been generated by an LLM.

Previous watermarking methods have had some limitations. They required access to the inner workings of the LLM and the original prompts used to generate the text during the detection process. This made them impractical for real-world deployment, where you might want to quickly check if a piece of text was generated by an LLM without having access to the model itself.

The Sampling One Then Accepting (STA-1) method proposed in this study addresses these limitations. STA-1 is an unbiased watermark, which means it preserves the quality of the text generated by the LLM while still allowing for reliable detection. Importantly, STA-1 does not require access to the LLM or the original prompts during the detection process, making it much more practical for real-world use.

The researchers also explored a novel trade-off between the strength of the watermark and the quality of the generated text. In low-entropy scenarios (where the text has limited variability), they found that unbiased watermarks face a trade-off between being strong enough to reliably detect and avoiding the risk of generating unsatisfactory outputs.

Overall, the STA-1 method represents an important advance in the field of LLM watermarking, making it more feasible to detect and mitigate the potential misuse of these powerful AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose the Sampling One Then Accepting (STA-1) method, an unbiased watermarking technique for large language models (LLMs) that does not require access to the LLM or the input prompts during the detection process.

Previous unbiased watermarking methods, such as those described in Watermarking Large Language Models and Reliability of Watermarks in Large Language Models, have been impractical for local deployment because they rely on access to the LLM's internal parameters and the original input prompts during detection. In contrast, the STA-1 method does not require this access, making it more suitable for real-world applications.

The key innovation of STA-1 is that it provides statistical guarantees for the type II error (the probability of failing to detect a watermarked output) of the watermark detection process. This is a important improvement over previous unbiased watermarking methods, which lacked such guarantees.

Additionally, the researchers explore a novel trade-off between the strength of the watermark and the quality of the generated text. They find that in low-entropy scenarios, where the text has limited variability, unbiased watermarks face a trade-off between being strong enough to reliably detect and avoiding the risk of generating unsatisfactory outputs.

The researchers evaluate the performance of STA-1 on both low-entropy and high-entropy datasets, and demonstrate that it achieves text quality and watermark strength comparable to existing unbiased watermarking methods, while maintaining a low risk of unsatisfactory outputs.

Critical Analysis

The STA-1 method represents an important advancement in the field of LLM watermarking by addressing the practical limitations of previous unbiased watermarking techniques. However, there are a few potential caveats and areas for further research:

  1. The study focuses on the detection of watermarked LLM outputs, but does not explore the robustness of the watermarks against adversarial attacks. It would be valuable to investigate how well the STA-1 watermarks hold up against attempts to remove or forge them.

  2. The trade-off between watermark strength and text quality in low-entropy scenarios is an interesting finding, but more research is needed to fully understand the implications and develop strategies to mitigate the risk of unsatisfactory outputs.

  3. The study evaluates the STA-1 method on a limited set of datasets. It would be beneficial to test the approach on a wider range of text types and domains to assess its broader applicability.

  4. The implementation details and the specific statistical guarantees provided by the STA-1 method are not discussed in depth. A more thorough technical explanation of these aspects would help readers better understand the novelty and limitations of the approach.

Overall, the STA-1 method represents a promising step forward in the development of practical and reliable watermarking techniques for large language models. As the use of these powerful AI systems continues to grow, it will be increasingly important to have robust mechanisms in place to detect and mitigate potential misuse.

Conclusion

This study introduces the Sampling One Then Accepting (STA-1) method, an unbiased watermarking technique for large language models (LLMs) that addresses the practical limitations of previous watermarking approaches.

The key advantages of STA-1 are that it does not require access to the LLM or the original input prompts during the detection process, and it provides statistical guarantees for the type II error of watermark detection. These features make STA-1 more suitable for real-world deployment compared to existing unbiased watermarking methods.

The researchers also explore a novel trade-off between watermark strength and text quality in low-entropy scenarios, where the generated text has limited variability. This finding highlights the importance of carefully balancing the competing objectives of reliable detection and maintaining high-quality outputs.

Overall, the STA-1 method represents an important step forward in the development of practical and effective watermarking solutions for large language models, which will be crucial for addressing the potential misuse of these powerful AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛸

Total Score

0

A Watermark for Low-entropy and Unbiased Generation in Large Language Models

Minjia Mao, Dongjun Wei, Zeyu Chen, Xiao Fang, Michael Chau

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have highlighted the risk of misuse, raising concerns about accurately detecting LLM-generated content. A viable solution for the detection problem is to inject imperceptible identifiers into LLMs, known as watermarks. Previous work demonstrates that unbiased watermarks ensure unforgeability and preserve text quality by maintaining the expectation of the LLM output probability distribution. However, previous unbiased watermarking methods are impractical for local deployment because they rely on accesses to white-box LLMs and input prompts during detection. Moreover, these methods fail to provide statistical guarantees for the type II error of watermark detection. This study proposes the Sampling One Then Accepting (STA-1) method, an unbiased watermark that does not require access to LLMs nor prompts during detection and has statistical guarantees for the type II error. Moreover, we propose a novel tradeoff between watermark strength and text quality in unbiased watermarks. We show that in low-entropy scenarios, unbiased watermarks face a tradeoff between watermark strength and the risk of unsatisfactory outputs. Experimental results on low-entropy and high-entropy datasets demonstrate that STA-1 achieves text quality and watermark strength comparable to existing unbiased watermarks, with a low risk of unsatisfactory outputs. Implementation codes for this study are available online.

Read more

5/24/2024

Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Models

Yepeng Liu, Yuheng Bu

The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to increasing concerns about the misuse of AI-generated text, and watermarking for LLM-generated text has emerged as a potential solution. However, it is challenging to generate high-quality watermarked text while maintaining strong security, robustness, and the ability to detect watermarks without prior knowledge of the prompt or model. This paper proposes an adaptive watermarking strategy to address this problem. To improve the text quality and maintain robustness, we adaptively add watermarking to token distributions with high entropy measured using an auxiliary model and keep the low entropy token distributions untouched. For the sake of security and to further minimize the watermark's impact on text quality, instead of using a fixed green/red list generated from a random secret key, which can be vulnerable to decryption and forgery, we adaptively scale up the output logits in proportion based on the semantic embedding of previously generated text using a well designed semantic mapping model. Our experiments involving various LLMs demonstrate that our approach achieves comparable robustness performance to existing watermark methods. Additionally, the text generated by our method has perplexity comparable to that of emph{un-watermarked} LLMs while maintaining security even under various attacks.

Read more

6/11/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models

Rohith Kuditipudi, John Thickstun, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Percy Liang

We propose a methodology for planting watermarks in text from an autoregressive language model that are robust to perturbations without changing the distribution over text up to a certain maximum generation budget. We generate watermarked text by mapping a sequence of random numbers -- which we compute using a randomized watermark key -- to a sample from the language model. To detect watermarked text, any party who knows the key can align the text to the random number sequence. We instantiate our watermark methodology with two sampling schemes: inverse transform sampling and exponential minimum sampling. We apply these watermarks to three language models -- OPT-1.3B, LLaMA-7B and Alpaca-7B -- to experimentally validate their statistical power and robustness to various paraphrasing attacks. Notably, for both the OPT-1.3B and LLaMA-7B models, we find we can reliably detect watermarked text ($p leq 0.01$) from $35$ tokens even after corrupting between $40$-$50%$ of the tokens via random edits (i.e., substitutions, insertions or deletions). For the Alpaca-7B model, we conduct a case study on the feasibility of watermarking responses to typical user instructions. Due to the lower entropy of the responses, detection is more difficult: around $25%$ of the responses -- whose median length is around $100$ tokens -- are detectable with $p leq 0.01$, and the watermark is also less robust to certain automated paraphrasing attacks we implement.

Read more

6/7/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Learnable Linguistic Watermarks for Tracing Model Extraction Attacks on Large Language Models

Minhao Bai, Kaiyi Pang, Yongfeng Huang

In the rapidly evolving domain of artificial intelligence, safeguarding the intellectual property of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly crucial. Current watermarking techniques against model extraction attacks, which rely on signal insertion in model logits or post-processing of generated text, remain largely heuristic. We propose a novel method for embedding learnable linguistic watermarks in LLMs, aimed at tracing and preventing model extraction attacks. Our approach subtly modifies the LLM's output distribution by introducing controlled noise into token frequency distributions, embedding an statistically identifiable controllable watermark.We leverage statistical hypothesis testing and information theory, particularly focusing on Kullback-Leibler Divergence, to differentiate between original and modified distributions effectively. Our watermarking method strikes a delicate well balance between robustness and output quality, maintaining low false positive/negative rates and preserving the LLM's original performance.

Read more

5/3/2024