Weak-to-Strong Reasoning

Read original: arXiv:2407.13647 - Published 7/19/2024 by Yuqing Yang, Yan Ma, Pengfei Liu

Overview

The paper explores techniques for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) through weak supervision.
It introduces a statistical framework for "weak-to-strong" generalization, which aims to leverage readily available "weak" annotations or signals to enhance the model's performance on more challenging "strong" tasks.
The paper also presents several case studies demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach in text classification and knowledge-free reasoning scenarios.

Plain English Explanation

The research in this paper focuses on making large language models (LLMs) better at reasoning and problem-solving. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, but they sometimes struggle with more complex tasks that require deeper reasoning.

The key idea behind the "weak-to-strong" approach is to use readily available "weak" annotations or signals to help the model improve its performance on more challenging "strong" tasks. For example, the model might first learn from simple text classification tasks, and then use that knowledge to tackle more complex reasoning problems.

The paper introduces a statistical framework that explains how this weak-to-strong approach can work. It also provides several case studies that show the benefits of this method, such as improving text classification and enabling knowledge-free reasoning.

The key advantage of the weak-to-strong approach is that it can help LLMs become more versatile and capable, without requiring massive amounts of labeled training data for every task. By leveraging readily available "weak" signals, the model can gradually build up its reasoning abilities and apply them to a wider range of problems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a statistical framework for "weak-to-strong" generalization, which aims to enhance the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) through the use of weak supervision. The framework is based on the idea that readily available "weak" annotations or signals can be leveraged to improve the model's performance on more challenging "strong" tasks.

The authors present several case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. In one study, they show how weak-to-strong reasoning can improve text classification performance by using simple label-based signals to guide the model's learning. In another study, they explore how LLMs can leverage weak supervision to perform knowledge-free reasoning, without relying on extensive domain-specific knowledge.

The paper also includes a statistical analysis that quantifies the potential gains from weak-to-strong generalization, highlighting the conditions under which this approach can be most effective.

Overall, the research presented in this paper demonstrates the promise of the weak-to-strong approach for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, without requiring massive amounts of labeled training data for every task.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) through weak supervision. The statistical framework and case studies provide a solid foundation for understanding how this technique can work in practice.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on text-based tasks, such as classification and reasoning. It would be interesting to see how the weak-to-strong approach could be applied to other domains, such as visual reasoning or multimodal tasks, to further explore its broader applicability.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential challenges or limitations of the weak-to-strong approach. For example, it would be valuable to understand how the quality and quantity of the available "weak" signals might impact the effectiveness of the technique, or how it might perform in the face of noisy or biased data.

[Future research could also explore ways to further optimize the weak-to-strong reasoning process, such as by developing more advanced learning algorithms or architectures designed to better leverage the available weak supervision.](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/optimizing-language-models-reasoning-abilities-weak-supervision)

Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. By leveraging readily available weak signals, the weak-to-strong approach has the potential to make LLMs more versatile and capable, with far-reaching implications for a wide range of applications.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel statistical framework for "weak-to-strong" generalization, which aims to improve the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) through the use of weak supervision. The key idea is to leverage readily available "weak" annotations or signals to enhance the model's performance on more challenging "strong" tasks, without requiring massive amounts of labeled data.

The case studies presented in the paper demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in text classification and knowledge-free reasoning scenarios, highlighting the potential for this technique to make LLMs more versatile and capable. The statistical analysis further quantifies the potential gains from weak-to-strong generalization, providing valuable insights into the conditions under which this approach can be most successful.

Overall, the research in this paper represents an important step forward in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, with potential applications in a wide range of domains. As the field of AI continues to evolve, techniques like weak-to-strong generalization will likely play an increasingly important role in unlocking the full potential of these powerful language models.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Weak-to-Strong Reasoning

Yuqing Yang, Yan Ma, Pengfei Liu

When large language models (LLMs) exceed human-level capabilities, it becomes increasingly challenging to provide full-scale and accurate supervisions for these models. Weak-to-strong learning, which leverages a less capable model to unlock the latent abilities of a stronger model, proves valuable in this context. Yet, the efficacy of this approach for complex reasoning tasks is still untested. Furthermore, tackling reasoning tasks under the weak-to-strong setting currently lacks efficient methods to avoid blindly imitating the weak supervisor including its errors. In this paper, we introduce a progressive learning framework that enables the strong model to autonomously refine its training data, without requiring input from either a more advanced model or human-annotated data. This framework begins with supervised fine-tuning on a selective small but high-quality dataset, followed by preference optimization on contrastive samples identified by the strong model itself. Extensive experiments on the GSM8K and MATH datasets demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the reasoning capabilities of Llama2-70b using three separate weak models. This method is further validated in a forward-looking experimental setup, where Llama3-8b-instruct effectively supervises Llama3-70b on the highly challenging OlympicArena dataset. This work paves the way for a more scalable and sophisticated strategy to enhance AI reasoning powers. All relevant code and resources are available in url{https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/weak-to-strong-reasoning}.

7/19/2024

💬

Optimizing Language Model's Reasoning Abilities with Weak Supervision

Yongqi Tong, Sizhe Wang, Dawei Li, Yifan Wang, Simeng Han, Zi Lin, Chengsong Huang, Jiaxin Huang, Jingbo Shang

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in handling complex queries, much of the past work has depended on extensively annotated datasets by human experts. However, this reliance on fully-supervised annotations poses scalability challenges, particularly as models and data requirements grow. To mitigate this, we explore the potential of enhancing LLMs' reasoning abilities with minimal human supervision. In this work, we introduce self-reinforcement, which begins with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) of the model using a small collection of annotated questions. Then it iteratively improves LLMs by learning from the differences in responses from the SFT and unfinetuned models on unlabeled questions. Our approach provides an efficient approach without relying heavily on extensive human-annotated explanations. However, current reasoning benchmarks typically only include golden-reference answers or rationales. Therefore, we present textsc{PuzzleBen}, a weakly supervised benchmark that comprises 25,147 complex questions, answers, and human-generated rationales across various domains, such as brainteasers, puzzles, riddles, parajumbles, and critical reasoning tasks. A unique aspect of our dataset is the inclusion of 10,000 unannotated questions, enabling us to explore utilizing fewer supersized data to boost LLMs' inference capabilities. Our experiments underscore the significance of textsc{PuzzleBen}, as well as the effectiveness of our methodology as a promising direction in future endeavors. Our dataset and code will be published soon on texttt{Anonymity Link}.

5/8/2024

🤯

A statistical framework for weak-to-strong generalization

Seamus Somerstep, Felipe Maia Polo, Moulinath Banerjee, Ya'acov Ritov, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai Sun

Modern large language model (LLM) alignment techniques rely on human feedback, but it is unclear whether the techniques fundamentally limit the capabilities of aligned LLMs. In particular, it is unclear whether it is possible to align (stronger) LLMs with superhuman capabilities with (weaker) human feedback without degrading their capabilities. This is an instance of the weak-to-strong generalization problem: using weaker (less capable) feedback to train a stronger (more capable) model. We prove that weak-to-strong generalization is possible by eliciting latent knowledge from pre-trained LLMs. In particular, we cast the weak-to-strong generalization problem as a transfer learning problem in which we wish to transfer a latent concept from a weak model to a strong pre-trained model. We prove that a naive fine-tuning approach suffers from fundamental limitations, but an alternative refinement-based approach suggested by the problem structure provably overcomes the limitations of fine-tuning. Finally, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the refinement approach with three LLM alignment tasks.

5/28/2024

Bayesian WeakS-to-Strong from Text Classification to Generation

Ziyun Cui, Ziyang Zhang, Wen Wu, Guangzhi Sun, Chao Zhang

Advances in large language models raise the question of how alignment techniques will adapt as models become increasingly complex and humans will only be able to supervise them weakly. Weak-to-Strong mimics such a scenario where weak model supervision attempts to harness the full capabilities of a much stronger model. This work extends Weak-to-Strong to WeakS-to-Strong by exploring an ensemble of weak models which simulate the variability in human opinions. Confidence scores are estimated using a Bayesian approach to guide the WeakS-to-Strong generalization. Furthermore, we extend the application of WeakS-to-Strong from text classification tasks to text generation tasks where more advanced strategies are investigated for supervision. Moreover, direct preference optimization is applied to advance the student model's preference learning, beyond the basic learning framework of teacher forcing. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for the reliability of a strong student model, showing potential for superalignment.

6/6/2024