What does the Knowledge Neuron Thesis Have to do with Knowledge?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the "Knowledge Neuron Thesis", which suggests that large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 may rely on distinct "knowledge neurons" to store and recall factual information.
- The research provides insights into how LLMs process and represent knowledge, which could have implications for interpreting key mechanisms of factual recall in transformer-based models and understanding the knowledge capacity of physics language models.
- The findings challenge the commonly held belief that LLMs learn and store knowledge in a distributed, holistic manner, suggesting a more nuanced, compartmentalized approach to knowledge representation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the idea that large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data, may not store knowledge in a completely uniform or distributed way. Instead, the researchers propose the "Knowledge Neuron Thesis" - the idea that these models might rely on distinct "knowledge neurons" to remember and recall specific factual information.
This is an interesting concept because it challenges the common assumption that these language models learn in a more holistic, interconnected way. The researchers provide evidence that there may be a more specialized, compartmentalized approach to how LLMs process and represent knowledge. This could help explain why large language models can sometimes perform better than expected on certain knowledge-intensive tasks, and could also shed light on how the latent representations of these models evolve over time to capture temporal knowledge.
Overall, the "Knowledge Neuron Thesis" offers a new perspective on the inner workings of large language models, which could have important implications for how we interpret and understand these powerful AI systems. By delving into the specific mechanisms used to store and recall factual information, the research could help advance the field of artificial neuron-enhanced problem solving in large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the "Knowledge Neuron Thesis," which suggests that large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 may rely on distinct "knowledge neurons" to store and recall factual information, rather than learning in a completely distributed or holistic manner.
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to investigate this hypothesis. They used targeted lesioning - selectively "damaging" or deactivating individual neurons in a trained LLM - to assess the model's ability to recall factual information. The results indicated that certain neurons were disproportionately responsible for retrieving specific pieces of knowledge, supporting the idea of specialized "knowledge neurons."
Further analysis revealed that these knowledge neurons tended to be highly selective, responding to narrow, well-defined concepts, rather than broader, more generalized knowledge. This suggests a more compartmentalized approach to knowledge representation in LLMs, in contrast to the commonly held view of distributed, holistic learning.
The findings have implications for our understanding of how large language models process and store information. They challenge the assumption that these models learn in a completely uniform way, and instead point to a more nuanced, specialized architecture for representing and recalling factual knowledge.
Critical Analysis
The "Knowledge Neuron Thesis" presented in this paper offers a compelling new perspective on the inner workings of large language models. By providing evidence for the existence of specialized "knowledge neurons," the research challenges the prevailing notion of distributed, holistic learning in these AI systems.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively narrow scope of the experiments, which focused primarily on factual recall. While this provides valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying knowledge representation, it remains to be seen how the "knowledge neuron" concept might apply to other cognitive tasks and domains, such as language generation, commonsense reasoning, or abstract problem-solving.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the implications of this thesis for the broader field of artificial neuron-enhanced problem solving. Further research would be needed to explore how the specialized nature of knowledge neurons might impact the overall capabilities and limitations of large language models.
Overall, the "Knowledge Neuron Thesis" represents a thought-provoking contribution to our understanding of how LLMs process and represent information. While more work is needed to fully explore the scope and implications of this idea, the findings presented in this paper challenge existing assumptions and open up new avenues for investigating the complex inner workings of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
The "Knowledge Neuron Thesis" proposed in this paper offers a novel perspective on how large language models like GPT-3 store and recall factual information. By providing evidence for the existence of specialized "knowledge neurons," the research challenges the commonly held view of distributed, holistic learning in these AI systems.
The findings have important implications for interpreting the key mechanisms of factual recall in transformer-based models, as well as understanding the knowledge capacity of physics language models. The specialized nature of knowledge neurons suggests a more nuanced, compartmentalized approach to knowledge representation in large language models, which could help explain their sometimes counter-intuitive performance on knowledge-intensive tasks and shed light on the evolution of their latent representations over time.
While more research is needed to fully explore the implications of the "Knowledge Neuron Thesis," this paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of how these powerful AI systems process and represent information. By challenging existing assumptions and proposing new perspectives, the research could help advance the field of artificial neuron-enhanced problem solving in large language models and lead to more accurate and interpretable language models in the future.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
What does the Knowledge Neuron Thesis Have to do with Knowledge?
Jingcheng Niu, Andrew Liu, Zining Zhu, Gerald Penn
We reassess the Knowledge Neuron (KN) Thesis: an interpretation of the mechanism underlying the ability of large language models to recall facts from a training corpus. This nascent thesis proposes that facts are recalled from the training corpus through the MLP weights in a manner resembling key-value memory, implying in effect that knowledge is stored in the network. Furthermore, by modifying the MLP modules, one can control the language model's generation of factual information. The plausibility of the KN thesis has been demonstrated by the success of KN-inspired model editing methods (Dai et al., 2022; Meng et al., 2022). We find that this thesis is, at best, an oversimplification. Not only have we found that we can edit the expression of certain linguistic phenomena using the same model editing methods but, through a more comprehensive evaluation, we have found that the KN thesis does not adequately explain the process of factual expression. While it is possible to argue that the MLP weights store complex patterns that are interpretable both syntactically and semantically, these patterns do not constitute knowledge. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the knowledge representation process, we must look beyond the MLP weights and explore recent models' complex layer structures and attention mechanisms.
Read more5/7/2024
📶
0
Knowledge Localization: Mission Not Accomplished? Enter Query Localization!
Yuheng Chen, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao
Large language models (LLMs) store extensive factual knowledge, but the mechanisms behind how they store and express this knowledge remain unclear. The Knowledge Neuron (KN) thesis is a prominent theory for explaining these mechanisms. This theory is based on the knowledge localization (KL) assumption, which suggests that a fact can be localized to a few knowledge storage units, namely knowledge neurons. However, this assumption may be overly strong regarding knowledge storage and neglects knowledge expression mechanisms. Thus, we re-examine the KL assumption and confirm the existence of facts that do not adhere to it from both statistical and knowledge modification perspectives. Furthermore, we propose the Query Localization (QL) assumption. (1) Query-KN Mapping: The localization results are associated with the query rather than the fact. (2) Dynamic KN Selection: The attention module contributes to the selection of KNs for answering a query. Based on this, we further propose the Consistency-Aware KN modification method, which improves the performance of knowledge modification. We conduct 39 sets of experiments, along with additional visualization experiments, to rigorously validate our conclusions.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Unveiling Factual Recall Behaviors of Large Language Models through Knowledge Neurons
Yifei Wang, Yuheng Chen, Wanting Wen, Yu Sheng, Linjing Li, Daniel Dajun Zeng
In this paper, we investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) actively recall or retrieve their internal repositories of factual knowledge when faced with reasoning tasks. Through an analysis of LLMs' internal factual recall at each reasoning step via Knowledge Neurons, we reveal that LLMs fail to harness the critical factual associations under certain circumstances. Instead, they tend to opt for alternative, shortcut-like pathways to answer reasoning questions. By manually manipulating the recall process of parametric knowledge in LLMs, we demonstrate that enhancing this recall process directly improves reasoning performance whereas suppressing it leads to notable degradation. Furthermore, we assess the effect of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, a powerful technique for addressing complex reasoning tasks. Our findings indicate that CoT can intensify the recall of factual knowledge by encouraging LLMs to engage in orderly and reliable reasoning. Furthermore, we explored how contextual conflicts affect the retrieval of facts during the reasoning process to gain a comprehensive understanding of the factual recall behaviors of LLMs. Code and data will be available soon.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Cracking Factual Knowledge: A Comprehensive Analysis of Degenerate Knowledge Neurons in Large Language Models
Yuheng Chen, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Yining Wang, Shengping Liu, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao
Large language models (LLMs) store extensive factual knowledge, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Previous research suggests that factual knowledge is stored within multi-layer perceptron weights, and some storage units exhibit degeneracy, referred to as Degenerate Knowledge Neurons (DKNs). Despite the novelty and unique properties of this concept, it has not been rigorously defined or systematically studied. We first consider the connection weight patterns of MLP neurons and define DKNs from both structural and functional aspects. Based on this, we introduce the Neurological Topology Clustering method, which allows the formation of DKNs in any numbers and structures, leading to a more accurate DKN acquisition. Furthermore, inspired by cognitive science, we explore the relationship between DKNs and the robustness, evolvability, and complexity of LLMs. Our execution of 34 experiments under 6 settings demonstrates the connection between DKNs and these three properties. The code will be available soon.
Read more6/18/2024