AboutMe: Using Self-Descriptions in Webpages to Document the Effects of English Pretraining Data Filters

Overview

• This paper explores how the choice of pretraining data for language models can impact the representation of social and cultural diversity in the resulting model.
• The researchers analyze the "About Me" sections of personal webpages to measure the diversity of self-descriptions captured by different language models.
• The findings suggest that language models trained on more culturally diverse data sources better represent the diversity of self-expression found online.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how the data used to train language models, such as those powering chatbots and text generation, can influence the diversity of perspectives and identities that the models end up reflecting. The researchers looked at the "About Me" sections on personal webpages as a way to measure this diversity.

When training AI language models, researchers often use large datasets of online text, like news articles or websites. However, these datasets may not equally represent all segments of society. The paper's authors wanted to see if using more diverse training data could lead to language models that better capture the breadth of how people describe themselves online.

To do this, they analyzed the language in "About Me" sections, which tend to contain people's self-descriptions of their identity, interests, and background. By comparing the diversity of self-descriptions across language models trained on different datasets, they could see which models better reflected the full range of how people express themselves.

The key finding was that language models trained on more culturally and socioeconomically diverse data sources were able to better represent the diversity of self-expression found online. This suggests that the choice of training data is an important factor in ensuring AI systems don't inadvertently amplify certain perspectives at the expense of others.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a method for assessing the diversity of language models by analyzing the self-descriptions people provide in their personal webpages. The researchers extracted "About Me" sections from a large corpus of webpages and used this data to evaluate the representations learned by different language models.

They first preprocessed the "About Me" text to extract relevant social dimensions, such as demographics, interests, and personal qualities. This allowed them to quantify the diversity of self-descriptions along these dimensions.

The researchers then compared the diversity captured by language models trained on different datasets, including large-language-model-guided-document-selection, multilingual-diversity-improves-vision-language-representations, and experiments-news-bias-detection-pre-trained-neural. They found that models trained on more culturally and socioeconomically diverse data, such as the one described in no-filter-cultural-socioeconomic-diversity-contrastive-vision, better captured the breadth of self-expression in the "About Me" sections.

The findings suggest that the choice of pretraining data can have a significant impact on the social and cultural diversity represented in language models. This has important implications for ensuring AI systems reflect the full diversity of human perspectives, as discussed in ask-llms-directly-what-shapes-your-bias.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel and insightful approach to evaluating the diversity of language models by analyzing self-descriptions in personal webpages. However, there are a few potential limitations to consider:

1. The "About Me" sections may not fully capture the diversity of self-expression, as people may present different aspects of themselves in other contexts, such as on social media.
2. The preprocessing of the text to extract social dimensions could introduce biases or miss nuances in how people describe themselves.
3. The comparison of language models trained on different datasets may be confounded by other factors, such as model architecture or training procedure.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for language models to perpetuate or amplify existing biases in the training data, even if they reflect a broader range of self-descriptions. Further research is needed to understand how to effectively mitigate these issues and ensure AI systems are truly representative of the diverse perspectives in society.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling approach to evaluating the diversity of language models by analyzing the self-descriptions people provide in their personal webpages. The findings suggest that the choice of pretraining data can have a significant impact on the social and cultural diversity represented in the resulting models.

The research highlights the importance of considering the diversity of training data when developing AI systems, as this can directly influence the perspectives and identities that are reflected. By using more diverse data sources, language models can better capture the breadth of human self-expression, which is crucial for developing AI that is inclusive and representative of all members of society.