A Review of the Challenges with Massive Web-mined Corpora Used in Large Language Models Pre-Training

Read original: arXiv:2407.07630 - Published 7/11/2024 by Micha{l} Pere{l}kiewicz, Rafa{l} Po'swiata
Total Score

0

šŸ’¬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the challenges and issues associated with using massive web-mined corpora for pre-training large language models (LLMs).
  • LLMs are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but their training data can have significant problems, including biases, toxicity, and privacy concerns.
  • The paper discusses the nature of web-mined corpora, the challenges they pose, and potential mitigation strategies to address these issues.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can generate human-like text, like writing articles or answering questions. These models are trained on massive amounts of text data from the internet, known as "web-mined corpora." However, this data can have significant issues that can negatively impact the performance and safety of the LLMs.

The paper explains that web-mined data can be biased, containing harmful or unethical content, and potentially violating people's privacy. For example, the data may reflect societal biases or include personal information that should not be used without consent.

To address these challenges, the paper discusses potential strategies, such as carefully curating the training data, aligning the models with ethical principles, and identifying and mitigating privacy risks. This can help ensure that LLMs are developed and used in a responsible and ethical manner, while still benefiting from the wealth of information available on the web.

Technical Explanation

The paper [A Review of the Challenges with Massive Web-mined Corpora Used in Large Language Models Pre-Training] examines the issues and concerns associated with using large-scale web-mined datasets for pre-training large language models (LLMs).

The authors first discuss the nature of web-mined corpora, highlighting their massive scale, heterogeneity, and the challenges this poses for curation and cleaning. They explain how these datasets can suffer from biases, toxicity, and privacy violations, which can then be propagated into the trained LLMs.

The paper then delves into the specific challenges of using web-mined corpora, such as the difficulty of constructing high-quality datasets for pre-training, the ethical implications of using data with potential harms, and the need to align the models with ethical principles during development.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges associated with using massive web-mined corpora for pre-training large language models. It rightly highlights the significant issues with data quality, biases, and privacy concerns that can arise from relying on such large-scale and heterogeneous datasets.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into specific mitigation strategies or case studies of how these challenges have been addressed in practice. While the paper discusses potential approaches, such as data curation and ethical alignment, more detailed examples or empirical evaluations of these methods would have strengthened the analysis.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the trade-offs and challenges involved in balancing the benefits of leveraging web-scale data with the need to ensure responsible and ethical development of LLMs. This would provide a more nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in this area of research.

Overall, the paper serves as an important contribution to the growing body of work on the responsible development of large language models, and it encourages readers to think critically about the potential risks and considerations involved in this rapidly evolving field.

Conclusion

This paper sheds light on the significant challenges and issues associated with using massive web-mined corpora for pre-training large language models. It highlights how these datasets can suffer from biases, toxicity, and privacy concerns, which can then be propagated into the trained models.

The paper emphasizes the need for careful data curation, ethical alignment, and privacy preservation strategies to address these challenges and ensure the responsible development of LLMs. By raising awareness of these issues, the paper encourages the AI research community and practitioners to think critically about the impacts of their work and strive for more ethical and trustworthy language models.

As the use of LLMs continues to expand, addressing the challenges posed by web-mined data will be crucial in realizing the full potential of these powerful AI systems while mitigating their potential risks and harms.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

šŸ’¬

Total Score

0

A Review of the Challenges with Massive Web-mined Corpora Used in Large Language Models Pre-Training

Micha{l} Pere{l}kiewicz, Rafa{l} Po'swiata

This article presents a comprehensive review of the challenges associated with using massive web-mined corpora for the pre-training of large language models (LLMs). This review identifies key challenges in this domain, including challenges such as noise (irrelevant or misleading information), duplication of content, the presence of low-quality or incorrect information, biases, and the inclusion of sensitive or personal information in web-mined corpora. Addressing these issues is crucial for the development of accurate, reliable, and ethically responsible language models. Through an examination of current methodologies for data cleaning, pre-processing, bias detection and mitigation, we highlight the gaps in existing approaches and suggest directions for future research. Our discussion aims to catalyze advancements in developing more sophisticated and ethically responsible LLMs.

Read more

7/11/2024

A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Bias
Total Score

0

A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Bias

Yuemei Xu, Ling Hu, Jiayi Zhao, Zihan Qiu, Yuqi Ye, Hanwen Gu

Based on the foundation of Large Language Models (LLMs), Multilingual Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been developed to address the challenges of multilingual natural language processing tasks, hoping to achieve knowledge transfer from high-resource to low-resource languages. However, significant limitations and challenges still exist, such as language imbalance, multilingual alignment, and inherent bias. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of MLLMs, delving deeply into discussions surrounding these critical issues. First of all, we start by presenting an overview of MLLMs, covering their evolution, key techniques, and multilingual capacities. Secondly, we explore widely utilized multilingual corpora for MLLMs' training and multilingual datasets oriented for downstream tasks that are crucial for enhancing the cross-lingual capability of MLLMs. Thirdly, we survey the existing studies on multilingual representations and investigate whether the current MLLMs can learn a universal language representation. Fourthly, we discuss bias on MLLMs including its category and evaluation metrics, and summarize the existing debiasing techniques. Finally, we discuss existing challenges and point out promising research directions. By demonstrating these aspects, this paper aims to facilitate a deeper understanding of MLLMs and their potentiality in various domains.

Read more

6/7/2024

Global Data Constraints: Ethical and Effectiveness Challenges in Large Language Model
Total Score

0

Global Data Constraints: Ethical and Effectiveness Challenges in Large Language Model

Jin Yang, Zhiqiang Wang, Yanbin Lin, Zunduo Zhao

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-4 and GPT-4o, have shown exceptional performance, especially in languages with abundant resources like English, thanks to extensive datasets that ensure robust training. Conversely, these models exhibit limitations when processing under-resourced languages such as Chinese and Korean, where issues including hallucinatory responses remain prevalent. This paper traces the roots of these disparities to the tokenization process inherent to these models. Specifically, it explores how the tokenizer vocabulary, often used to speed up the tokenization process and reduce tokens but constructed independently of the actual model training data, inadequately represents non-English languages. This misrepresentation results in the propagation of 'under-trained' or 'untrained' tokens, which perpetuate biases and pose serious concerns related to data security and ethical standards. We aim to dissect the tokenization mechanics of GPT-4o, illustrating how its simplified token-handling methods amplify these risks and offer strategic solutions to mitigate associated security and ethical issues. Through this study, we emphasize the critical need to rethink tokenization frameworks to foster more equitable and secure AI technologies.

Read more

8/13/2024

šŸ“Š

Total Score

0

Deciphering the Impact of Pretraining Data on Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning

Yang Zhao, Li Du, Xiao Ding, Kai Xiong, Zhouhao Sun, Jun Shi, Ting Liu, Bing Qin

Through pretraining on a corpus with various sources, Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained impressive performance. However, the impact of each component of the pretraining corpus remains opaque. As a result, the organization of the pretraining corpus is still empirical and may deviate from the optimal. To address this issue, we systematically analyze the impact of 48 datasets from 5 major categories of pretraining data of LLMs and measure their impacts on LLMs using benchmarks about nine major categories of model capabilities. Our analyses provide empirical results about the contribution of multiple corpora on the performances of LLMs, along with their joint impact patterns, including complementary, orthogonal, and correlational relationships. We also identify a set of ``high-impact data'' such as Books that is significantly related to a set of model capabilities. These findings provide insights into the organization of data to support more efficient pretraining of LLMs.

Read more

8/29/2024